Search found 32 matches
- Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:16 am
- Forum: Modelling
- Topic: 28mm LATER OTTOMAN TURKISH
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2448
- Mon Nov 09, 2009 9:28 pm
- Forum: Spanish Speaking Forum
- Topic: FoG 28mm??
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3851
- Mon Nov 09, 2009 9:16 pm
- Forum: Modelling
- Topic: 28mm LATER OTTOMAN TURKISH
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2448
- Mon Nov 09, 2009 2:18 pm
- Forum: Modelling
- Topic: 28mm LATER OTTOMAN TURKISH
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2448
28mm LATER OTTOMAN TURKISH
Well i want to re-build and paint a 28mmm later ottoman turk. I m about to choose some from the Assault group turks and some from the Old Glory ranges. Seems that the old glory ones are worth because of their lower prices, but what about his quality???
The assault group does not have XV C, turks ...
The assault group does not have XV C, turks ...
- Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:02 pm
- Forum: Spanish Speaking Forum
- Topic: FoG 28mm??
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3851
- Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:02 pm
- Forum: Spanish Speaking Forum
- Topic: FoG 28mm??
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3851
FoG 28mm??
Habeis leido/visto/jugado a fog a 28mm?? se juega tambien a 800 puntos? y la mesa?? o es mejor a 600... no descarto hacerme uno a 28mm quizas un turco otmano para variar.... 
- Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:48 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Army's lacking medium infantry
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3207
- Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:00 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Where do we go from here?
- Replies: 23
- Views: 5309
- Sat Oct 03, 2009 7:55 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Where do we go from here?
- Replies: 23
- Views: 5309
- Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:45 am
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: mid-republican roman list opinions
- Replies: 17
- Views: 5011
All i can say is that is big, lots of BGs. Here we are not using such big poor quality armies. But it seems that there in GB those armies rules! I use some poor LF and i like them, but i know they will flee in face of other LF.
I use the 8 bow LF BG but not 4.
I use also a 2 elements BG, but these ...
I use the 8 bow LF BG but not 4.
I use also a 2 elements BG, but these ...
- Sun Sep 27, 2009 1:34 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Timurid list advice/tactics for comps (is there none!)
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3485
Ilove ottomans, i adore ottomans, i think there is a list that can allways hide a surprise, and the posibilities of combining troops is great, good Cv, "cheap" bw LH, sme Kn allied, some 8 points handgun BG... brilliant janissaries... lots of L Foot, from poor to sup, from bow to jav, to sling or Xb ...
- Sun Sep 27, 2009 1:26 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Spartan Army
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2670
- Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:20 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Smallest army in BGs
- Replies: 28
- Views: 6385
- Fri Sep 25, 2009 11:03 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Blood and Gold
- Replies: 77
- Views: 24453
- Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:43 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: charge path redux
- Replies: 84
- Views: 15977
- Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:39 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: charge path redux
- Replies: 84
- Views: 15977
I ussualy see in the battles fought, that the charge s direction are declared without any "clear" target, ie, a unit or BG, but are declared on " a direction, that would create a path where evaders will evade, i mean a charge made to clear an space, we are seing then a unit that is not charging at ...
- Fri Sep 25, 2009 6:48 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: charge path redux
- Replies: 84
- Views: 15977
We declare the path at the same time as the charge declaration, it simplifies evasio/interception.
But i am in the opnion than, first declaration of charges, then all possible targets declare to evade or not, interceptions are made and then evasion and the charges. But that creates more confusion ...
But i am in the opnion than, first declaration of charges, then all possible targets declare to evade or not, interceptions are made and then evasion and the charges. But that creates more confusion ...
- Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:44 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: RUSS armies
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2277
- Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:47 am
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: RUSS armies
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2277
- Sat Sep 19, 2009 7:39 pm
- Forum: Player Designed Lists
- Topic: Almughavars in Cataln Company
- Replies: 25
- Views: 47554
Re: Almughavar armour
With regards to quality status in the lists, my main beef is that too many troops are listed as superior when more average would have allowed for finer distinctions. For example, how do you reflect that French knights were regarded as better than their contemporaries when virtually all knights are ...