What about the second scenario where the LH pass a CMT to charge Cv that evade such that the LH are now charging a different non-skirmisher BG? Does the CMT carry over to the new target?
The rule on page 60 suggests no.
"must halt their charge 1 MU away from enemy to their front whom they would ...
Search found 68 matches
- Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:16 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Another Fringe Encounter
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3074
- Mon Apr 12, 2010 3:37 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Question on 2nd rank shifting
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1748
Re: Question on 2nd rank shifting
No. If you start in a legal formation then an advance cannot change that formation. If you want to shuffle rear rank bases around, you need to expand, contract or turn.smaul1 wrote:can a second rank shift while the front rank does not.
Best wishes,
Matthew
- Mon Apr 12, 2010 3:34 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Question on a multiple unit impact and melee with angles
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2318
Re: Question on a multiple unit impact and melee with angles
so after impact we were able to conform some of the purple to the light green, but we are not sure how to conform the 1 purple stand that impacted the red BG.
You never 'conform some' of a BG. If any can't, then none do.
do we leave them as is (not moving them at all) with the one stand of ...
You never 'conform some' of a BG. If any can't, then none do.
do we leave them as is (not moving them at all) with the one stand of ...
- Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:47 am
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Spearmen
- Replies: 30
- Views: 8544
- Sun Mar 21, 2010 9:19 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Spearmen
- Replies: 30
- Views: 8544
- Sat Mar 20, 2010 11:55 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Spearmen
- Replies: 30
- Views: 8544
Re: Spearmen
What about Armoured, Average, Undrilled, Defensive spear then?
My take on Defensive spear is that they need to be apparently soft enough to encourage the enemy to engage them (rather than just skirmishing or avoiding them) while in fact being tough enough to hang on until the more mobile or ...
My take on Defensive spear is that they need to be apparently soft enough to encourage the enemy to engage them (rather than just skirmishing or avoiding them) while in fact being tough enough to hang on until the more mobile or ...
- Sat Mar 20, 2010 3:26 am
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Spearmen
- Replies: 30
- Views: 8544
Re: Spearmen
Can any army get lots (i.e. at least 16) bases of Armoured, Poor, Undrilled Defensive Spearmen?
Armoured defensive spearmen aren't very common. But given that maintaining cohesion is so critical for spearmen, I really can't see why you would prefer poor armoured to average protected for the same ...
Armoured defensive spearmen aren't very common. But given that maintaining cohesion is so critical for spearmen, I really can't see why you would prefer poor armoured to average protected for the same ...
- Thu Mar 18, 2010 9:06 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: charging 2 bg at 1 bg that is directly to the front
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1553
- Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:05 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Army Construction vs. Knights
- Replies: 22
- Views: 6015
A combination of troops that can skirmish, preferably ones that can shoot as well, plus solid heavy foot like pikes or spearmen is the probably the best way to deal with knights.
I resemble that remark, though I think the shooting is optional. My Later Visigoths (centre of defensive spear, flanks ...
I resemble that remark, though I think the shooting is optional. My Later Visigoths (centre of defensive spear, flanks ...
- Mon Mar 01, 2010 1:55 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Flank charge question
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1695
- Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:48 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Flank Charge - Turning to face
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1741
Re: Flank Charge - Turning to face
A unit of 6 MF (Unit A) in single column charges an ememy unit of 3 wide and 2 deep MF (Unit B) in the flank.
Unit B turns 2 bases (one behind the other) to face the chargers, leaving the remaining 4 bases facing in the original direction.
The impact is fought.
Q1 - Does Unit B suffer any penalty ...
Unit B turns 2 bases (one behind the other) to face the chargers, leaving the remaining 4 bases facing in the original direction.
The impact is fought.
Q1 - Does Unit B suffer any penalty ...
- Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:48 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Why do we bother ?
- Replies: 28
- Views: 7414
- Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:32 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: 3 questions on flank/rear contacts
- Replies: 14
- Views: 4556
- Fri Sep 18, 2009 3:07 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: the resounding dullness of the 800 point game.
- Replies: 119
- Views: 26829
- Fri Aug 21, 2009 12:19 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: orb formation
- Replies: 41
- Views: 10219
1 base width 4 elements deep of pike is a fighting formation.
True, but difficult to realize. I haven't rules at hand, but I don't think pikes BG could be less than 8 bases at start.
Most pike are in 8s or 12s, but there are a few 4s (e.g. mercenaries in WotR English, Swiss in Medieval Burgundian ...
True, but difficult to realize. I haven't rules at hand, but I don't think pikes BG could be less than 8 bases at start.
Most pike are in 8s or 12s, but there are a few 4s (e.g. mercenaries in WotR English, Swiss in Medieval Burgundian ...
- Fri Aug 21, 2009 12:12 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Intercept charges
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2066
- Fri Aug 21, 2009 7:38 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: orb formation
- Replies: 41
- Views: 10219
- Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:17 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Intercept charges
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2066
- Thu Aug 20, 2009 10:56 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: orb formation
- Replies: 41
- Views: 10219
- Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:01 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Balista on a Steep Hill
- Replies: 21
- Views: 5185