Search found 12 matches
- Thu Apr 24, 2008 1:52 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Drilled or Undrilled Skirmishers; why should we care?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2564
Drilled or Undrilled Skirmishers; why should we care?
Why do we need to worry about skirmishers being drilled or undrilled? They act the same in the game . . . don't they?
- Mon Apr 21, 2008 2:19 am
- Forum: Modelling
- Topic: Old Glory 15's Parthian figures
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2390
- Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:24 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: What Happens to Commanders When Their BG is Destroyed
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2292
- Sun Apr 20, 2008 5:13 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: What Happens to Commanders When Their BG is Destroyed
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2292
OK, there is the problem. I did not read the part about them needing to make a rout move when they autobreak. I knew that the BG was not removed until the JAP. Thanks. However, you could have the situation where an enemy BG is in contact with a friendly BG with commander that is destroyed. Anyone ha...
- Sat Apr 19, 2008 7:34 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: What Happens to Commanders When Their BG is Destroyed
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2292
- Sat Apr 19, 2008 6:47 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: What Happens to Commanders When Their BG is Destroyed
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2292
What Happens to Commanders When Their BG is Destroyed
We had a situation where a BG of Roman Cavalry, with a Commander fighting in the front rank, was destroyed in the JAP because of autobreak. They were in melee at the time. What happens to the commander? Does he die because he is in contact with the enemy and alone? There was no other friendly unit i...
- Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:22 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Uses of LF
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1434
- Mon Mar 10, 2008 5:41 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Question concerning disengaging from melee
- Replies: 43
- Views: 9125
Skirmishers need careful use as skirmishers in FOG. If you are wanting to get your heavies into a fight its very easy. Put your skirmishers in front of the legions and don't charge enemy skirmishes. If you are charged evade bhind your heavies. This is the maximum sped forward route that shiedl your...
- Mon Mar 10, 2008 5:15 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Question concerning disengaging from melee
- Replies: 43
- Views: 9125
We were toying with the idea that you can disengage skirmishers if they can move directlly behind heavier units in one move. We were thinking about allowing any unit to break off from melee with an evade move before any other action in the impact phase. Any unit can then declare a charge against th...
- Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:36 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Question concerning disengaging from melee
- Replies: 43
- Views: 9125
Question concerning disengaging from melee
We ran our first large battle over the weekend; Late Republican Romans against Later Seleucids. It was an interesting battle except for one problem which I will cover later. The Romans were outclassed in cavalry and were concerned about having a Cannae pulled on them, so they wanted to press forward...
- Wed Feb 27, 2008 2:27 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Light Horse Archer Question
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1107
Re: Light Horse Archer Question
Hello, I was wondering what the advantage is of Light Horse with Bow over Light Horse with Bow*. The Bow armed light horse costs one more point per stand, but I can't find any advantage for them over the Bow* equipped light horse. This is an easy one. There are no LH with Bow*. Thanks for the quick...
- Wed Feb 27, 2008 2:10 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Light Horse Archer Question
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1107
Light Horse Archer Question
Hello, I was wondering what the advantage is of Light Horse with Bow over Light Horse with Bow*. The Bow armed light horse costs one more point per stand, but I can't find any advantage for them over the Bow* equipped light horse.
Thanks, Mark
Thanks, Mark