Light Horse Archer Question

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

Post Reply
Onomarchos
Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 2:03 pm
Location: Vienna, Virginia USA

Light Horse Archer Question

Post by Onomarchos »

Hello, I was wondering what the advantage is of Light Horse with Bow over Light Horse with Bow*. The Bow armed light horse costs one more point per stand, but I can't find any advantage for them over the Bow* equipped light horse.

Thanks, Mark
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28287
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Re: Light Horse Archer Question

Post by rbodleyscott »

Onomarchos wrote:Hello, I was wondering what the advantage is of Light Horse with Bow over Light Horse with Bow*. The Bow armed light horse costs one more point per stand, but I can't find any advantage for them over the Bow* equipped light horse.
This is an easy one. There are no LH with Bow*.
Onomarchos
Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 2:03 pm
Location: Vienna, Virginia USA

Re: Light Horse Archer Question

Post by Onomarchos »

rbodleyscott wrote:
Onomarchos wrote:Hello, I was wondering what the advantage is of Light Horse with Bow over Light Horse with Bow*. The Bow armed light horse costs one more point per stand, but I can't find any advantage for them over the Bow* equipped light horse.
This is an easy one. There are no LH with Bow*.
Thanks for the quick reply. I was using the point system from the rule book to build some lists for forces that don't have a companion book yet. So, after looking at the definitions for Bow and Bow*, I should have always cost Horse Archers as Bow.
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28287
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Re: Light Horse Archer Question

Post by rbodleyscott »

Onomarchos wrote:Thanks for the quick reply. I was using the point system from the rule book to build some lists for forces that don't have a companion book yet. So, after looking at the definitions for Bow and Bow*, I should have always cost Horse Archers as Bow.
Mostly yes. However some Cavalry that only used bow as a secondary weapon (e.g. Lithuanians) get graded as Light Spear, Bow*, Swordsmen. Their light horse gets graded as Light Spear, Bow, Swordsmen because, as you have pointed out, grading them as Bow* would have no effect (except to make them cheaper).

Some Cavalry that fought in shallow mixed formations of lancers and archers (e.g. Byzantine Tagmatic cavalry) get graded as Lancers, Bow*, Swordsmen. There is no Light Horse equivalent.

As a general guide most steppe nomad "light cavalry" get the option to be graded as
LH Unprotected, Bow, Swordsmen
or
Cavalry Unprotected, Bow, Swordsmen
or
Cavalry Protected, Bow, Swordsmen

(Player's choice, and you can have different BGs graded different ways in the same army)..

Settled light cavalry horse archers (e.g. Parthians) are usually
LH, Bow, - as they are assumed to be less fierce and less capable in close combat.
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”