VII) Novgorod (Final)

1. Prestige at start: 1800
2. Bought Units: 1*Recon
3. Upgraded Units: none
4. Enhanced Unit strength: artillery + 8,8 + fighters to maximum
5. Prestige after Buying and Upgrading: about 100
6. Scenario Result: DV 18/19
7. Prestige at Scenario End: 201
8. Lost Units: 1 ...

I selected Leningrad.

VI) Ostrov

1. Prestige at start: 2186
2. Bought Units: 1*Bf 109 f + 1* JU 87 R (To have a weapon against the heavy russian tanks)
3. Upgraded Units: The captured Matilda II was definetly too slow (3 field Movement) in the last scenario, so i replaced it here with an PZ III H ...

DLC Grand Campaign '41

Selected level of difficulty: Fieldmarshall

I) Belgrad

1. Prestige at start: 3000
2. Bought Units: 2
1*Sdfkfz 232/8
1*Panzer IVE
3. Upgraded Units: none
4. Enhanced Unit strength: no
5. Prestige after Buying and Upgrading:
6. Scenario Result: DV in 14/18
7. Prestige ...

Started a GC '40 campaign on Colonel. First scenario i got a DV in turn 14/15, but it felt too hard for this level. After victory I tried Albert Canal 5 times, because every try I lost too much units to win. I do not feel that the scenario at this level can be obtained. Attacks from the AI are very ...

21) Dijon:
- Prestige at start: 1337
- after redeploy and overstrength: 118
- DV 16/18 with 923 Prestige at end. Had no great problems to finish this scenario.
- Captured 1 Char tank

22) Maginot:
- Prestige at start: 1732
- Upgrade Wehrmacht to pioneer
- Prestige after redeploy and overstrenght ALL ...

18 ) Calais:
- Prestige at start: 1075
- DV 14/19 with 321 Prestige
- Lost 1 Recon

19 ) Dunkirk
- Prestige at start: 1421, 007 after redeploy and overstrength of pioneers, ariplanes and artillery
- Bought 1 Recon 232
- DV 13/?
- Lost one Recon and bought a new
- The victory was confusing because I ...

17) Arras (continuation):
- Prestige at start 2725
- Prestige after repair and overstrenght the units: 1204
- Forget my requirements to reduce the Prestige for the last scenario, I needed the Prestige in this scenario for (elite) replacements. Perhaps it would have been better to use normal ...

15) Sedan:
- Prestige at start 1289
- Bought: Sturmpanzer
- DV 14/18
But I did not capture the cities in the northwest. This time I landed some Tanks in the 'deep' south, I think this fastened my victory. I think that this scenario is perfect as it is; it's hard and mistakes will be punished by the ...

12)Eben-Emael:
- 850 Prestige at start 626 after repairing units
- Become SE PZ III F
- Bought: Panzer IVD
- Upgrades: Artillery: 2* 10,5 cm --> 15 cm
- Prestige after all: 190
- DV in 13/15 finished with 828 Prestige. Finished it without greater problems.

13) Albert Canal:
- Prestige at start ...

11) Narvik:
- Disband the captured artillery (Forgot to note the Starting Prestige)
- bought: 1 Fighter 109
- DV 11/18
But I had clearly more problems than in V1: First I had a violent aerial combat. My 2 fighters were shot down to 4/10. Thus I had problems to repel the Strategic Bomber, which ...

5) Kampinsoka:
- Gain one SE Infantery
- Prestige at start 290
- bought 1 38t 1 core slot is free but I have no more Prestige
- Lost one Gebirgsjäger
- DV 15/16

6) Modlin:
- Gain one SE Infantery
- Prestige at at start 338
- bought: 38t
- DV 14/17 Prestige at end 349

I found it easier than in v1 ...

Fieldmarshall

1) Poznan:
- bought: JU, 38t, Pioneer, Sturmpanzer
- AA on 13,9 did not attack Fighter on 12,9
- Polish Fighter did not attack JU (no own fighter near)
- more planes then V1: better!

DV 12/14

2) Danzig Corridor
- Prestige at start 844 after redeploy 577
- 2 Wehrmacht, 1 ...

Is it necessary that someone is playing the campaign on the easier levels?

Kerensky wrote:Well Narvik is harder now. Just look at the state of the German fleet by the time I finished, on a very last turn victory by the way. I hope you're happy!
http://i.imgur.com/ZlGWx.jpg

Of course I do play test on Manstein so...

why do I see there 3 SE tank and no SE infantery?

played on FieldMarshall

After the very hard Sedan scenario this one seemed like holiday. I also found a prestige boost in the beginning, about what I was pleased very much,
because I had to repair much.
I counted about 5-6 isolated tanks, there lonely standing makes it easy too destroy them. I ...

Played on Fieldmarshall

Another strange and beautiful scenario: My first mistake was splitting my Core Units into to two parts, and go to attack the north with one of them and the center with the other. There are so many counterattacking Infanterie Units that both parts of my army became problems ...

Fieldmarshall

OK. This is the first scenario that i cannot handle after easy going through polen and norway. I end this first try because of massive counterattacks and running out of prestige to repair my chipped units. I have to restart the scenario to continue the campaign. But because I'm ...

Fieldmarshall

OK. This is the first scenario that i cannot handle after easy going through polen and norway. I end this first try because of massive counterattacks and running out of prestige to repair my chipped units. I have to restart the scenario to continue the campaign. But because I'm ...

Fieldmarshall.

I agree with the chorus: DV in turn 7. I love the three norway scenarios. But they are all too easy for fieldmarshall.

Played with Field marshall difficulty.
I love this scenario but in my opinion it is too easy. I finished it in round 9 with decisive.

Why are the ports on 13.10, 14.12 and 14.13 closed, after conquering the nearby towns and victory positions?

The AA in the north west did not attack a nearby ...