I play single player all the time. One thing I like to do in DAG games is create armies but don't use all the points. I will create a 400 point army, then upgrade the points to 500, but don't buy any more troops. That way, when I play a DAG game against the AI with that army the AI will have 500 poi...

Is the game being designed with modding in mind? It would be cool to be able to model a favourite universe.

I think the use of cards is brilliant. Not only does it give a clear way of showing details, but it gives the game the feeling that you are playing a board game. I like that.

I must say - I like the level of detail presented for the units and the quick to read way to view unit stats! Keep up the good work!

It looks interesting to me too. I like the feel of the maps and graphics. Is it your intention to remain '2D' centric?

I have to agree about the supporting rear-rank missile troops - just saying. As much as I appreciate any work being done on the game and not to seem like I am prying, but I am a little unclear as to how Slitherine is supporting Field of Glory. Is it a full time, paid gig for you Cothyso, or is it mo...

I second that. Any information would be appreciated.

Ha! Nothing SuperHeroic about the name, just a mispronunciation during French language training in the Air Force. It kind of stuck after that.

I have to agree with jimkoby. I haven't messed with the Beta either, so even a short note to let us know where things stand would be appreciated.

I would be interested in seeing all the books made into expansions for the Digital game. Any news on when this might begin happening for the new version?

Personally, I find armies with a lot of bow-armed cavalry, or mixed elements don't work for me. I find the watering down of both missile and melee makes them less useful and generally not as fun to play with. Also, does anyone use mobs or poor troops for anything other than filling out numbers? I fi...

Just a note: Davouthojo started a great Wiki for digital Field of Glory. It is useful for FOG players and may serve as a good prototype for other wikis.

Though it is stickied in the FOG forum, here is the link.

http://fog-pc-wiki.wikispaces.com

Just wanted to say, this looked like a really interesting mod. Too bad I never had the chance to try it.

I have seen rule systems for Napoleonics that don't necessarily rely on formations i.e. Horse, Foot and Guns, though I haven't played those ones specifically. Would it be that difficult to adapt FOG to FOG-N and perhaps make iterative improvements as the game goes along, rather than having a huge st...

Though there are many great suggestions here for enhancements, I would be satisfied initially with the same mechanics with the new code base and getting some of the DLC's that have been put aside (Wolves, Eagles, Fealty etc.). Any word on when we can expect to see the new game come out? Also, just m...

OK, thanks Iain. I just wanted to make sure it wasn't a problem at my end somehow. I look forward to the evolution of this game i.e. graphics etc.

Has anyone else experienced this for vs AI games?

I returned to playing FOG after a couple of months and noticed that my rankings aren't updating anymore. I always play against the AI and it used to update. Wins, losses, number of games, nothing has updated for the past couple of weeks for me. Do the rankings only reflect multiplayer now?

I for one would love to have FOG for iPad. That way I can play while I sit with my wife while she watches TV!

Congrats Cothyso! I think this is great news! I love this game and having the question mark about the future has been a worry. Going forward with improvements and possibly porting to iPad is wonderful. Once things are back up with the new code base, is there a good possibility that the previously ab...