iainmcneil wrote:Hi guys

just to clarify the new version & updates for the base game FoG will be free, but any expansions wont be, including the Battle Pack.

Does it mean all the players having paid far more than 100 € for all the extensions will have to buy them again to continue playing ?

According to the Swiss system, I should not meet the same opponent twice in the same tournament. But I'm playing with Iandavidsmith on round 3 and 4.

OK thanks for the rule enlightening.

I've been playing the Early Mamluks versus some Byzantines and it appears my Halqa Lancers do not get their lancer POA at impact against the Latinikon.

It is not easy to win with the Mamluks, but if they can't charge with their lances, it is just suicide.

Match nul entre les Byzantins de PdC et les Germains de Komet pour le match retour.

C'est ça : http://www.slitherine.com/tournaments/fog_pc

Mais je ne sais pas si le joueur lambda a accès à l'interface admin.

Moi aussi je serais plutôt d'accord pour réduire le thème, genre faire un tournoi par livre par exemple, un RoR, un SoA, etc.

Et aussi pourquoi n'utilise-t-on pas le module de tournoi intégré à FoG ? Il n'est pas encore dispo ?

Victoire épique de la mobilité des Lusitaniens de PdC sur la panzerdivision Byzantine de Nikolax - 39/37 à 46/49

Les Byzantins Comnènes de PdC battent les Ecossais Continentaux de Dopffer 20/30 contre 45/42.

7 challenges créés.

Comme mon pseudo est ennyueyx à taper, le mot de passe est juste pierre, tout en minuscules.

Bonjour,

Je suis un peu en retard mais si vous souhaitez un 8ème joueur, je suis ok.

76mm / Moscow, Russia Amaz_Ed / Stafford, England Angiel / Massa, Italy Aryaman / Alicante, Spain Barkmann / Adelaide, Australia. Batesmotel / Townsend, Massachusetts, USA Blathergut / Ontario, Canada Brigz / Sacramento, Calif., USA CharlesRobinson / Hawaii, USA CheerfullyInsane / Birkerød, Denmark ...

I've been playing a few games lately using particularly Romans and Thracians and they never get their Swordsmen or Swordsmen+ PoA. And I think no unit at all gets this PoA. Could you please check those PoAs and may be others ?

I think the Foot with Romphaia in Thracian army lack the heavy weapon capability in combat as it is not shown in POAs. However, they are heavy weapons in theory. There might be the same problem in other Thracian mercenaries or units in other IMF armies.

As far as I know, there were no fixes in 1.2.5 and 1.2.6 for cavalry break offs. The general idea of cavalry break offs is that cavalry that is not winning will pull back in order to charge in again. It is not intended to be a way to infiltrate through the enemy line where you could not otherwise m...

As far as I know, there were no fixes in 1.2.5 and 1.2.6 for cavalry break offs. The general idea of cavalry break offs is that cavalry that is not winning will pull back in order to charge in again. It is not intended to be a way to infiltrate through the enemy line where you could not otherwise m...

As far as I know, there were no fixes in 1.2.5 and 1.2.6 for cavalry break offs. The general idea of cavalry break offs is that cavalry that is not winning will pull back in order to charge in again. It is not intended to be a way to infiltrate through the enemy line where you could not otherwise m...

Sorry to be a little off topic, but I'd rather seeing the let's-all-charge-in-happiness and oops-my-cav-broke-off-behind-the-enemy-lines-and-will-route-them-in-the-next-turn bugs being addressed first and before thinking of adapting new army books.

After playing quite a few games (more than 100), I totally agree with the anarchy charge flaw since last patch. I'm not an historian but I find it hard to believe any drilled troop under command would (suicide) charge any ennemy in their range or lose any advantage position at least once in every ba...

Rearguard mission : turn count is wrong : it starts after several turns have passed and ends at 5 turns remaining, unless I've destroyed all ennemies.