Quick Win or Battle Experience??

PSP/DS/PC/MAC : WWII turn based grand strategy game

Moderators: firepowerjohan, rkr1958, Happycat, Slitherine Core

Post Reply
Blathergut
Field Marshal - Elefant
Field Marshal - Elefant
Posts: 5882
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
Location: Southern Ontario, Canada

Quick Win or Battle Experience??

Post by Blathergut »

Another question:

Is it better to go for a quick German win in Poland and Holland-Belgium-France by avoiding unnecessary combats

or

Is it better to take an extra turn or two (or three) and let the infantry korps fight (and take losses) for experience? Do you end up gaining somehow or is the experience gained through the combats lost forever by taking casualties/replacements???
joerock22
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Posts: 928
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 12:38 am
Location: Connecticut, USA

Post by joerock22 »

Units will lose experience when you repair losses. The only way for a ground unit to gain experience quickly is to have it fight in situations where it can cause a lot of damage without taking much itself. The main reason to go for a quick capture of Poland is because France grows exponentially stronger as time goes on. Invading France in January instead of March or April will make an enormous difference. Delaying in Poland will cost you time, resources from France, and losses. Germany must move quickly and without hesitation through Poland, Denmark, Holland, and Belgium in 1939 and very early 1940, or they will probably end up losing the war. You can get away with taking your time against the AI, but not against a good human opponent.
Redpossum
Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
Posts: 1814
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:09 am
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Contact:

Post by Redpossum »

I would say it's a delicate balance between time and casualties. Doing it fast at the expense of heavy losses is as bad as dawdling.
joerock22
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Posts: 928
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 12:38 am
Location: Connecticut, USA

Post by joerock22 »

possum wrote:I would say it's a delicate balance between time and casualties. Doing it fast at the expense of heavy losses is as bad as dawdling.
That's true. The trick is to do both at the same time. 8)
Post Reply

Return to “MILITARY HISTORY™ Commander - Europe at War : General Discussion”