Early Tercios

Byzantine Productions Pike and Shot is a deep strategy game set during the bloody conflict of the Thirty Years War.

Moderators: rbodleyscott, Slitherine Core, Gothic Labs

Post Reply
KiwiWarlord
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Posts: 1222
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 7:39 am
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand

Early Tercios

Post by KiwiWarlord »

Should Early Tercios be able to shoot all round ?
i.e. have the choice of which facing they fire from.
awesum4
Captain - Bf 110D
Captain - Bf 110D
Posts: 898
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:22 am

Re: Early Tercios

Post by awesum4 »

Yes. In fact they should be able to fire from two or three sides (maybe at reduced factors to the side or rear). If there are enemy to their rear presumably the rear shot (and those on the rear corners) would be facing those enemy.
Currently Early Tercios are ineffective against the later, shallower, formations. I know this is historically accurate, but from a gaming perspective it makes it difficult to win with them. Warlord and I have been playing a series of random army 30 years war skirmishes, and my Imperialist/Spanish forces seem to always come up against slightly more "modern" armies. I still enjoy the games but it is slightly frustrating to always be outnumbered in units and outshot.
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28403
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Re: Early Tercios

Post by rbodleyscott »

awesum4 wrote:Yes. In fact they should be able to fire from two or three sides (maybe at reduced factors to the side or rear). If there are enemy to their rear presumably the rear shot (and those on the rear corners) would be facing those enemy.
Currently Early Tercios are ineffective against the later, shallower, formations. I know this is historically accurate, but from a gaming perspective it makes it difficult to win with them. Warlord and I have been playing a series of random army 30 years war skirmishes, and my Imperialist/Spanish forces seem to always come up against slightly more "modern" armies. I still enjoy the games but it is slightly frustrating to always be outnumbered in units and outshot.
I am sure it was historically too.

In FOGR tercios can shoot all round, but we made a design decision in P&S that this was not completely realistic, because a tercio would not be able to shoot all round while advancing. Hence we require it to turn to face to shoot, which effectively prevents this.
Richard Bodley Scott

Image
KiwiWarlord
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Posts: 1222
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 7:39 am
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand

Re: Early Tercios

Post by KiwiWarlord »

FOGR tercios can shoot all round, but we made a design decision in P&S that this was not completely realistic, because a tercio would not be able to shoot all round while advancing. Hence we require it to turn to face to shoot, which effectively prevents this.
Is it possible to allow Tercios to shoot all round if they remain stationary ?
TheGrayMouser
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Posts: 5001
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:42 pm

Re: Early Tercios

Post by TheGrayMouser »

Warlord wrote:
FOGR tercios can shoot all round, but we made a design decision in P&S that this was not completely realistic, because a tercio would not be able to shoot all round while advancing. Hence we require it to turn to face to shoot, which effectively prevents this.
Is it possible to allow Tercios to shoot all round if they remain stationary ?
I m sure it is if you can figure out the coding. There appears to be relic code for left and right flank "salvoes", plus, the unit spreadsheet has a line for # of shots allowed.
( I was thinking a nice alternative for tercios could be one firing per "arc", per turn)
KateMicucci
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 3:31 am

Re: Early Tercios

Post by KateMicucci »

rbodleyscott wrote: In FOGR tercios can shoot all round, but we made a design decision in P&S that this was not completely realistic, because a tercio would not be able to shoot all round while advancing. Hence we require it to turn to face to shoot, which effectively prevents this.
Not sure that this is the case. Edward Davis describes two methods to shoot from flanks while advancing in 1619, and another method to shoot to the rear while marching away from the enemy. If the English could figure it out then surely the Spanish could as well.
https://gyazo.com/41b6faa3e61df0bd2c80f9eecb9aed50
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28403
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Re: Early Tercios

Post by rbodleyscott »

KateMicucci wrote:
rbodleyscott wrote: In FOGR tercios can shoot all round, but we made a design decision in P&S that this was not completely realistic, because a tercio would not be able to shoot all round while advancing. Hence we require it to turn to face to shoot, which effectively prevents this.
Not sure that this is the case. Edward Davis describes two methods to shoot from flanks while advancing in 1619, and another method to shoot to the rear while marching away from the enemy. If the English could figure it out then surely the Spanish could as well.
https://gyazo.com/41b6faa3e61df0bd2c80f9eecb9aed50
Very interesting.
Richard Bodley Scott

Image
awesum4
Captain - Bf 110D
Captain - Bf 110D
Posts: 898
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:22 am

Re: Early Tercios

Post by awesum4 »

I have no problem with tercios only shooting to the front while advancing. In that situation I would think any shooting to the flank or rear would be rather ineffective, especially if the formation was advancing at march speed. But a stationary tercio should fire off each flank. The later shallower formations would still be able to devastate it with fire if they could get several shooting at it.
This is based on my feelings for what appears logical, rather than any extensive research I have done.
Post Reply

Return to “Pike & Shot”