"Challenging" or "hard", which one should i go for?

Forum for the strategy game set during the 2nd War for Armageddon.

Moderators: Slitherine Core, BA Moderators, WH40K Armageddon moderators

Post Reply
SchDerGrosse
Private First Class - Wehrmacht Inf
Private First Class - Wehrmacht Inf
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 12:08 pm

"Challenging" or "hard", which one should i go for?

Post by SchDerGrosse »

Hello there,

Just bought the whole Wh40k package and about to start from the IG campaign.

What difficulty level should I chose? My initial pick would be "challenging" as I dont really like the idea of the "inflated" enemy units on higher settings.

On the other hand I would also want to avoid the "blasting through everything with 15 titans" as some people here complained is possible when you have too much prestige.

I'am a PZC veteran and would like a worthy challange but without the "you did a single wrong step/lost a unit thus you are screwed, game over" phaenomena. So probably the highest difficulty level is out of the question then. :twisted:

Which one should i pick? Challenging or hard?


thanks in advance for the input,
Sch
enpi
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 3:53 pm

Re: "Challenging" or "hard", which one should i go for?

Post by enpi »

hard is not that a problem, but for one scenario which is very difficult to win even on normal. I would say try first challenging.
Post Reply

Return to “Warhammer® 40,000® Armageddon™”