Retiring Through Friends

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3862
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Retiring Through Friends

Post by dave_r »

If a battle group of Light Foot has a battle group of Cavalry (two bases deep) directly behind them and in contact, can they retire 2" and maintain their facing?

The turn (pg 42) states "Turn 180 deg, move maximum of 2 MUs in a SIMPLE advance and turn back again"

Interpenetration (pg 49) states "if a battle group does not have sufficient move distance to pass fully through another battle group it can nevertheless pass completely through if there is room beyond and any of the following apply..."

One of the following notes did apply - therefore can the interpenetration rule be used to increase this distance of 2" move?
Evaluator of Supremacy
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3081
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Re: Retiring Through Friends

Post by grahambriggs »

Clearly not, as their move would then be more than the 2MU maximum surely?
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3862
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Re: Retiring Through Friends

Post by dave_r »

grahambriggs wrote:Clearly not, as their move would then be more than the 2MU maximum surely?
But the interpenetration bit states that you are allowed to move through even if you don't have the distance to do it?
Evaluator of Supremacy
zoltan
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Posts: 901
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:40 am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: Retiring Through Friends

Post by zoltan »

Presumably the interpenetration rule (where it validly applies) modifies every type of move? This would include both moves involving a variable die roll and those involving an ostensibly fixed distance.
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3862
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Re: Retiring Through Friends

Post by dave_r »

zoltan wrote:Presumably the interpenetration rule (where it validly applies) modifies every type of move? This would include both moves involving a variable die roll and those involving an ostensibly fixed distance.
Yes, which is the pertinent point in question.
Evaluator of Supremacy
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3081
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Re: Retiring Through Friends

Post by grahambriggs »

dave_r wrote:
grahambriggs wrote:Clearly not, as their move would then be more than the 2MU maximum surely?
But the interpenetration bit states that you are allowed to move through even if you don't have the distance to do it?
Yes, but it doesn't say you can then turn 180 again afterwards. So my reading of it is you can turn, interpenetrate and turn again if you move 2MU or less. But if you turn, interpenetrate and move more than 2MU, then you can't trun a second time.
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3862
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Re: Retiring Through Friends

Post by dave_r »

Pg 40 also talks about the "maximum move distances" a BG can make. But this is over ruled by the interpenetration rules?
Evaluator of Supremacy
petedalby
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3118
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Fareham, UK

Re: Retiring Through Friends

Post by petedalby »

Yes, but it doesn't say you can then turn 180 again afterwards. So my reading of it is you can turn, interpenetrate and turn again if you move 2MU or less. But if you turn, interpenetrate and move more than 2MU, then you can't turn a second time.
That sounds reasonable to me. Anything else and it looks like you are trying to stretch the rules. Never a good thing in my view.
Pete
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3862
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Re: Retiring Through Friends

Post by dave_r »

petedalby wrote:
Yes, but it doesn't say you can then turn 180 again afterwards. So my reading of it is you can turn, interpenetrate and turn again if you move 2MU or less. But if you turn, interpenetrate and move more than 2MU, then you can't turn a second time.
That sounds reasonable to me. Anything else and it looks like you are trying to stretch the rules. Never a good thing in my view.
Not stretching the rules. Just the movement distance ;)
Evaluator of Supremacy
petedalby
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3118
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Fareham, UK

Re: Retiring Through Friends

Post by petedalby »

I'll regret asking.....but what benefit can you get from it?

Skirmishers can turn 180 and still do a full move.
Pete
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3862
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Re: Retiring Through Friends

Post by dave_r »

petedalby wrote:I'll regret asking.....but what benefit can you get from it?

Skirmishers can turn 180 and still do a full move.
You get to be pointing the right way. That enables you to turn and double wheel and stuff after you have turned 180.
Evaluator of Supremacy
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3081
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Re: Retiring Through Friends

Post by grahambriggs »

dave_r wrote:Pg 40 also talks about the "maximum move distances" a BG can make. But this is over ruled by the interpenetration rules?
No, the interpenetration rules tell you if the BG has "does not have sufficient move distance" it can nevertheless go through. so your LF can make the move. But they haven't met the conditions that allow them to make a second turn; which is that to make that complex move you can only move a maximum of 2MU.
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3862
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Re: Retiring Through Friends

Post by dave_r »

grahambriggs wrote:
dave_r wrote:Pg 40 also talks about the "maximum move distances" a BG can make. But this is over ruled by the interpenetration rules?
No, the interpenetration rules tell you if the BG has "does not have sufficient move distance" it can nevertheless go through. so your LF can make the move. But they haven't met the conditions that allow them to make a second turn; which is that to make that complex move you can only move a maximum of 2MU.
OK - I can cope with that. Thanks Graham.
Evaluator of Supremacy
hazelbark
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4957
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Capital of the World !!

Re: Retiring Through Friends

Post by hazelbark »

grahambriggs wrote:
dave_r wrote:Pg 40 also talks about the "maximum move distances" a BG can make. But this is over ruled by the interpenetration rules?
No, the interpenetration rules tell you if the BG has "does not have sufficient move distance" it can nevertheless go through. so your LF can make the move. But they haven't met the conditions that allow them to make a second turn; which is that to make that complex move you can only move a maximum of 2MU.
Sanity. Thank you Graham.
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”