Attack! Devizes - 19th/20th July 2014 - A Time of Rebellion
Moderators: terrys, Slitherine Core, FOGR Design
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28411
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
Attack! Devizes - 19th/20th July 2014 - A Time of Rebellion
I am proposing the following theme for Attack! in July, but I would welcome (helpful) comments.
900 points Doubles.
Theme: "A Time of Rebellion"
Any army 1642-1660 from any of the army list books, with the following additional restrictions.
i. No heavily armoured mounted troops permitted.
ii. Army must include at least 16 bases of mounted battle troops.
iii. Army must include at least 6 bases of foot battle troops for each base of medium or heavy artillery.
The aim of the date period is to allow Determined Horse a good runout, to stick with traditional 2 pike, 4 shot foot BGs, and to exclude any detached bayonet shenanigans. However, I have not excluded eastern and exotic armies.
Hopefully this will provide an interesting mix of armies, different from previous themes.
If anyone can see any loophole in the above that allows any particular army list a special advantage, please could you point it out.
Richard
Edited in the light of comments below.
900 points Doubles.
Theme: "A Time of Rebellion"
Any army 1642-1660 from any of the army list books, with the following additional restrictions.
i. No heavily armoured mounted troops permitted.
ii. Army must include at least 16 bases of mounted battle troops.
iii. Army must include at least 6 bases of foot battle troops for each base of medium or heavy artillery.
The aim of the date period is to allow Determined Horse a good runout, to stick with traditional 2 pike, 4 shot foot BGs, and to exclude any detached bayonet shenanigans. However, I have not excluded eastern and exotic armies.
Hopefully this will provide an interesting mix of armies, different from previous themes.
If anyone can see any loophole in the above that allows any particular army list a special advantage, please could you point it out.
Richard
Edited in the light of comments below.
-
kevinj
- Major-General - Tiger I

- Posts: 2379
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:21 am
- Location: Derbyshire, UK
Re: Attack! Devizes - proposed theme - not yet finalised
I would suggest that the 2 BGs of foot battle troops should be at least 6 bases just in case any devious person thinks of using Commanded Shot for the purpose.
Since I thought of that, does that make me really devious?
Since I thought of that, does that make me really devious?
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28411
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
Re: Attack! Devizes - proposed theme - not yet finalised
No, it just means I was knackered when I thought out the theme last night after getting back from Burton. Congrats on your triumph.kevinj wrote:I would suggest that the 2 BGs of foot battle troops should be at least 6 bases just in case any devious person thinks of using Commanded Shot for the purpose.
Since I thought of that, does that make me really devious?
-
alasdair2204
- Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad

- Posts: 600
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 1:40 pm
Re: Attack! Devizes - proposed theme - not yet finalised
rbodleyscott wrote:I am proposing the following theme for Attack! in July, but I would welcome (helpful) comments.
Any army 1642-1660.
No heavily armoured mounted troops permitted.
Army must include at least 16 bases of mounted battle troops.
Army must include at least 12 bases of foot battle troops for each BG of medium or heavy artillery.
The aim of the date period is to allow Determined Horse a good runout, to stick with traditional 2 pike, 4 shot foot BGs, and to exclude any detached bayonet shenanigans. However, I have not excluded eastern and exotic armies.
Hopefully this will provide an interesting mix of armies, different from previous themes.
If anyone can see any loophole in the above that allows any particular army list a special advantage, please could you point it out.
Richard
A dream come true
can't wait
Alasdair
Now to work out how many cavalry I can get for 900 points
Re: Attack! Devizes - proposed theme - not yet finalised
Do we know the dates for Attack! yet?
Bob
Bob
Re: Attack! Devizes - proposed theme - not yet finalised
Not so much an objection as an observation:
Those of us who like to take a lot of foot are forced to have a high minimum of horse. Yet the cavalry king is given free rein
How about a minimum of 24 bases of M/HF? That way everyone is forced to waste points on troops they don't want.
Dave
Those of us who like to take a lot of foot are forced to have a high minimum of horse. Yet the cavalry king is given free rein
How about a minimum of 24 bases of M/HF? That way everyone is forced to waste points on troops they don't want.
Dave
-
kevinj
- Major-General - Tiger I

- Posts: 2379
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:21 am
- Location: Derbyshire, UK
Re: Attack! Devizes - proposed theme - not yet finalised
Except that you have to take 4 BGs of Foot in order to have 2 BGs of artillery.Yet the cavalry king is given free rein
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28411
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
Re: Attack! Devizes - proposed theme - not yet finalised
As Kevin says, he is given free rein as long as he is willing to do without artillery.kevinj wrote:Except that you have to take 4 BGs of Foot in order to have 2 BGs of artillery.Yet the cavalry king is given free rein
Re: Attack! Devizes - proposed theme - not yet finalised
He could do without artillery, or take one bg of four and just twelve bases of foot.kevinj wrote:Except that you have to take 4 BGs of Foot in order to have 2 BGs of artillery.Yet the cavalry king is given free rein
So cavalry armies can pick and choose, but foot armies are weighed down with numerous mounted toffs!
Seems fair to me...
Dave
-
madaxeman
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E

- Posts: 3002
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 5:15 am
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
Re: Attack! Devizes - proposed theme - not yet finalised
Is this Dave starting a "what previously unknown but actually a hidden tiger sort of list has this seemingly bizzarre and almost unimaginably unusual combination of troops"? quiz?daveallen wrote:
He could do without artillery, or take one bg of four and just twelve bases of foot.
Dave
http://www.madaxeman.com
Holiday in Devon? Try https://www.thecaptainscottagebrixham.com
Holiday in Devon? Try https://www.thecaptainscottagebrixham.com
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28411
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
Re: Attack! Devizes - proposed theme - not yet finalised
Good point.daveallen wrote:He could ... take one bg of four [artillery] and just twelve bases of foot.
OK. So I have changed it to "Army must include at least 6 bases of foot battle troops for each base of medium or heavy artillery."
-
alasdair2204
- Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad

- Posts: 600
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 1:40 pm
Re: Attack! Devizes - proposed theme - not yet finalised
Feeling picked on again
Alasdair
Alasdair
Re: Attack! Devizes - proposed theme - not yet finalised
Yes I am!alasdair2204 wrote:Feeling picked on again
Dave
How about:
Armies must have at least whichever is the lesser of the maximum amount of mounted battle troops from their core list or 16.
-
madaxeman
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E

- Posts: 3002
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 5:15 am
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
Re: Attack! Devizes - proposed theme - not yet finalised
alasdair2204 wrote:Feeling picked on again
Alasdair
Go on then, what's the list with the 4-pack heavy guns and almost no compulsory foote you were looking at ?
http://www.madaxeman.com
Holiday in Devon? Try https://www.thecaptainscottagebrixham.com
Holiday in Devon? Try https://www.thecaptainscottagebrixham.com
Re: Attack! Devizes - proposed theme - not yet finalised
There are at least four.
Wouldn't have moaned if there weren't any...
Dave
Wouldn't have moaned if there weren't any...
Dave
-
nikgaukroger
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 10287
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: LarryWorld
Re: Attack! Devizes - proposed theme - not yet finalised
daveallen wrote:There are at least four.
Wouldn't have moaned if there weren't any...
Dave
Yes you would have.
Nik Gaukroger
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
-
madaxeman
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E

- Posts: 3002
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 5:15 am
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
Re: Attack! Devizes - proposed theme - not yet finalised
At a guess, 2 Ottomans... and ... ?daveallen wrote:There are at least four.
Wouldn't have moaned if there weren't any...
Dave
http://www.madaxeman.com
Holiday in Devon? Try https://www.thecaptainscottagebrixham.com
Holiday in Devon? Try https://www.thecaptainscottagebrixham.com
Re: Attack! Devizes - proposed theme - not yet finalised
Later Ottoman, Later Russian, Moghul & Early Louis XIV are all available between 1642 and 1660.
Sadly, the new restrictions might make them too "footy."
Sadly, the new restrictions might make them too "footy."
-
alasdair2204
- Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad

- Posts: 600
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 1:40 pm
Re: Attack! Devizes - proposed theme - not yet finalised
My doubles rules are simple, if with Paddy must have artillery or he gets upset, if without Paddy no artilleryrbodleyscott wrote:As Kevin says, he is given free rein as long as he is willing to do without artillery.kevinj wrote:Except that you have to take 4 BGs of Foot in order to have 2 BGs of artillery.Yet the cavalry king is given free rein
cheers
Alasdair
-
alasdair2204
- Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad

- Posts: 600
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 1:40 pm
Re: Attack! Devizes - proposed theme - not yet finalised
Army sorted
just getting last couple of units painted
cheers
Alasdair
just getting last couple of units painted
cheers
Alasdair

