mixed BG base removal

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
franck
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz  251/1
Posts: 145
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 2:08 pm

mixed BG base removal

Post by franck »

Probably this has been already answered somewher but I can't find it .

A BG of 6 bases (1/2 shooters :shock: , 1/2 HTW :evil: ) :
assuming the formation is 2 bases wide, and 3 deep (facing top) :
:evil: :evil:
:shock: :shock:
:shock: :evil:

When shoot at, and one base is to be dropped, a :evil: is lost. Same case in a melee.

How and when can take the reserved rear :evil: the place of the lost base ?
1) during a melee I assume, this is not possible
2) if the loss occured during a shooting phase, this can be done only through a reforming, or this can be done through a normal movement ?

Thanks

Franck
petedalby
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3118
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Fareham, UK

Re: mixed BG base removal

Post by petedalby »

You can choose which base to replace the lost base with. Reforming doesn't come into it.

So you could choose to add :twisted: in either scenario.
Pete
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Re: mixed BG base removal

Post by philqw78 »

Lost bases are replaced by ANY rear rank base
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
franck
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz  251/1
Posts: 145
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 2:08 pm

Re: mixed BG base removal

Post by franck »

Thank you for your answers.

Do you mean that a HTW lost, must not be replaced by the directly behind shooter duting a melee ?
That's really a suprise for me, as I don't see it is played this way usually : my Warring States Chinese have been "forced" to put Crossbow in the melee after a loss (at least in this part of the Channel!)

Franck
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Re: mixed BG base removal

Post by philqw78 »

franck wrote:Thank you for your answers.

Do you mean that a HTW lost, must not be replaced by the directly behind shooter duting a melee ?
That's really a suprise for me, as I don't see it is played this way usually : my Warring States Chinese have been "forced" to put Crossbow in the melee after a loss (at least in this part of the Channel!)

Franck
I don't know the page off the top of my head but there are rules for which base is removed and which replace it. It only becomes complex when in 1 line and fighting multiple BG. But a lost base is replaced by any rear rank base. If you are 4 deep and 3 wide you can replace the lost base with ANY of the 9 rear bases.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3081
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Re: mixed BG base removal

Post by grahambriggs »

franck wrote:Thank you for your answers.

Do you mean that a HTW lost, must not be replaced by the directly behind shooter duting a melee ?
That's really a suprise for me, as I don't see it is played this way usually : my Warring States Chinese have been "forced" to put Crossbow in the melee after a loss (at least in this part of the Channel!)

Franck
Correct. You have been playing this wrong. The rule (page 124, Base Removal, last paragraph) says about the replacement "Non-front rank bases must be used...can be from any part of the battle group". So you can choose any of the four bases in the second and third rank to replace the casualty.
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”