Diplomaticus wrote:This is an interesting idea, but the amount of detail you've given for your GSR is a bit intimidating--more like a full-fledged AAR.
Might I suggest that we solicit just brief game summaries? If we even just knew who played whom in 2.1 & what the results were, it would be useful information. If people wanted to add some more details, that would be nice too.
Not to take away from what you've done below, but I think the low rate of response might be due to how much work/time it would take to make up something like you've provided.
I do, at times get carried away in my writeups. I didn't mean to say that players needed to produce a GSR even close to the level of detail for the example I gave. It could really be an all text summary. What I really want to accomplish is to have a thread where folks can report axis (or allied) wins and losses and include some explanation of the game. If we get enough responses from the GS community then I think we can start making some informed conclusions about how well GS is balanced. Otherwise; I'm afraid all we have is anecdotally data, which while is interesting is not statistically relevant.
I'm not looking for a personal won-lost record here but an overall composite (axis-allied) won-lost breakdown. I'd be happy to compile and maintain the statistics if enough folks are willing to provide them (in this thread) and write some sort of GSR in order for us to assess the strengths of the opponents and the direction of the game.
By the way, antidotally, the axis are 2-0-1 in three games that I've completed in the last month. And the 2 victories are both ultimate victories.