Commanders again - sorry!

[petedalby]

The authors have clearly debated the treatment of Commanders at length as explained in Simon's recent post and the rapid change away from the printed version of 5.03 / 5.04.

As printed though, having the Commander in the centre of the BG, either front or rear, appears to work well.

It's clear, simple, unambiguous, cheese free and serves to differentiate a FC from a TC. I'm struggling to see the benefits of returning to a floating position within the BG? Given the other posts on this topic is there merit in running a poll? Or are you confident that this is the best solution?

Or am I missing the benefits? I just see it as an opportunity to put cheese back on the menu?

Sorry to keep on.....

Pete

[rbodleyscott]

The authors have clearly debated the treatment of Commanders at length as explained in Simon's recent post and the rapid change away from the printed version of 5.03 / 5.04.

As printed though, having the Commander in the centre of the BG, either front or rear, appears to work well.

It's clear, simple, unambiguous, cheese free and serves to differentiate a FC from a TC. I'm struggling to see the benefits of returning to a floating position within the BG? Given the other posts on this topic is there merit in running a poll? Or are you confident that this is the best solution?

Or am I missing the benefits? I just see it as an opportunity to put cheese back on the menu?

Sorry to keep on.....

Pete

I cannot dispute anything you say. However, it is a done deal I am afraid.

[jre]

I cannot dispute anything you say. However, it is a done deal I am afraid.

Nevertheless, we (actually, Francisco and me) also prefer the fixed position rule. Just adding our voice.

Jose

[rogerg]

Played again last night. It was Paul Brandon's first game. We used the rules as printed. Commanders at the centre rear once again worked really well. We are even positioning them at the centre rear. Add my voice to those who want to stay with this rule.

Roger

[nicofig]

I cannot dispute anything you say. However, it is a done deal I am afraid.

Why ? Nothing is printed. I read many post where the players says this rules was better. Someone are disagree ?

[malekithau]

I like the central positioning as well even with the "floating" rule I usually position my generals central rear. Unfortunately it does seem to open up the bag of fromage and indeed make the TC less useful. To be honest I'd like to see IC restricted to specific historical lists ie Hannibal in Italy/Zama or for historical scenarios only not for general tournament play. Otherwise I can see TC not being used at all.