Possible bug - Soviets and surrender of Italy

Moderators: firepowerjohan, rkr1958, Happycat, Slitherine Core

Post Reply
zechi
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
Posts: 763
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 1:42 pm

Possible bug - Soviets and surrender of Italy

Post by zechi »

Not a big issue, but in my game with Morris the Soviets managed to take the two last Italian cities and forced an Italian surrender. Nevertheless, Italy surrenders to the UK. Is this intended or is this a bug?

Cheers Zechi
pk867
Sr. Colonel - Battleship
Sr. Colonel - Battleship
Posts: 1602
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 3:18 pm

Post by pk867 »

Italy always surrenders to the UK.
Morris
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2294
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:00 am

Post by Morris »

pk867 wrote:Italy always surrenders to the UK.
Why ? Even if Soviet conquer all Italy , Italy also surrender to UK ? it does not make sense .
pk867
Sr. Colonel - Battleship
Sr. Colonel - Battleship
Posts: 1602
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 3:18 pm

Post by pk867 »

That is how the game engine works. If the Russians defeat the Germans the game will end (if Italy is out) Germany will surrender to UK.

It has been this way since the Vanilla game.
Blathergut
Field Marshal - Elefant
Field Marshal - Elefant
Posts: 5882
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
Location: Southern Ontario, Canada

Post by Blathergut »

Who would you have rather surrendered to? 8)
Morris
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2294
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:00 am

Post by Morris »

pk867 wrote:That is how the game engine works. If the Russians defeat the Germans the game will end (if Italy is out) Germany will surrender to UK.

It has been this way since the Vanilla game.
Does it mean this game is created by English ? If US conquer Italy , will it also appears Italy surrender to UK?
pk867
Sr. Colonel - Battleship
Sr. Colonel - Battleship
Posts: 1602
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 3:18 pm

Post by pk867 »

Yes. It US forces meet the surrender conditions, Italy surrenders to UK.
Peter Stauffenberg
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4745
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:13 pm
Location: Oslo, Norway

Post by Peter Stauffenberg »

A major power surrenders to the country in change of the other side. For the Allies the sequence is:
* UK
* USA
* USSR

For USA to be used the UK must have surrendered. For USSR to be used then both UK and USA must have been surrendered.

For the Axis the sequence is:
* Germany
* Italy
Morris
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2294
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:00 am

Post by Morris »

Stauffenberg wrote:A major power surrenders to the country in change of the other side. For the Allies the sequence is:
* UK
* USA
* USSR

For USA to be used the UK must have surrendered. For USSR to be used then both UK and USA must have been surrendered.

For the Axis the sequence is:
* Germany
* Italy
I get it . But I still feel not make sense . Does it mean that UK was the Allies leader in WW2 ? Even if USA agree, USSR won't .
Peter Stauffenberg
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4745
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:13 pm
Location: Oslo, Norway

Post by Peter Stauffenberg »

It has nothing to do with that, but who the game considers to be the country in charge when you check for certain things. UK is probably chosen because they're active from the start while USA and USSR start as neutral.

France can't be chosen because they often surrender.

This is something we inherited from the vanilla game. I don't think it's worth changing. If a major Axis power surrenders then the game is about to end anyway and it doesn't matter who they surrenders to.

Actually Germany surrendered to the ALLIES (i. e. UK, USA AND USSR). So this is just a definition more than a real game effect.
Morris
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2294
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:00 am

Post by Morris »

Stauffenberg wrote:. So this is just a definition more than a real game effect.
If this is just a definition , I am quite ok with it .
rkr1958
General - Elite King Tiger
General - Elite King Tiger
Posts: 4264
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 2:20 am

Post by rkr1958 »

Stauffenberg wrote:Actually Germany surrendered to the ALLIES (i. e. UK, USA AND USSR). So this is just a definition more than a real game effect.
The Germans really wanted to surrendered only to the US/UK and not to the USSR. In fact, Himmler in the last days of the war in Europe was trying to work his way to Eisenhower headquarters to seek a separate peace with the US/UK. He never made it and was captured after Germany's surrender by the British and killed himself.

An excellent movie that I've found and watch 2 times recently is Downfall. It centers around Hitler and his inner circle in the final days of the 3rd Reich. It's setting if primarily in, and around, Hitler's Berlin bunker and the story is based on a book by and interviews of Traudl Junge, Hitler's private secretary. In fact the movie includes the last interview with her before her death in 2002. When I watched the movie I had recognized her from a BBC interview in early 70's done for their series, "World at War". Downfall is all in German, but even having to watch it with subtitles I highly recommend it.
zechi
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
Posts: 763
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 1:42 pm

Post by zechi »

Does it have any impact on the game to whom a major power surrenders? If this is the case, then I think this should be changed. If it is only a formality, then it would not be necessary to change it.
rkr1958
General - Elite King Tiger
General - Elite King Tiger
Posts: 4264
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 2:20 am

Post by rkr1958 »

zechi wrote:Does it have any impact on the game to whom a major power surrenders? If this is the case, then I think this should be changed. If it is only a formality, then it would not be necessary to change it.
For me the question should be, "Does it have any impact on the outcome of the game?" given the time and effort to implement and properly test a change this fundamental and of this magnitude. I've never experienced a situation where Italy or Germany surrendering to the UK impacted the outcome of the game. So for me, there are a lot of other potential changes with higher priority than this one.
zechi
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
Posts: 763
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 1:42 pm

Post by zechi »

rkr1958 wrote:
zechi wrote:Does it have any impact on the game to whom a major power surrenders? If this is the case, then I think this should be changed. If it is only a formality, then it would not be necessary to change it.
For me the question should be, "Does it have any impact on the outcome of the game?" given the time and effort to implement and properly test a change this fundamental and of this magnitude. I've never experienced a situation where Italy or Germany surrendering to the UK impacted the outcome of the game. So for me, there are a lot of other potential changes with higher priority than this one.
If it has an impact on the game, then it can always have an impact on the outcome of a game. Imagine a situation where the western Allies did not get ashore at all in Europe, but the Soviets manage to take out Hamburg and Berlin, while Italy is still in the game.

Germany will then surrender to the UK. All German units will disappear, but who will take control of the German cities? I'm not sure what happens then, because I never had this situation, but who will get control of the German cities? The Italian or the British? If its the British, then this could have an impact on the game, as the Soviets will not be able to rail units to British controlled cities.
Kragdob
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 683
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:55 pm
Location: Poland

Post by Kragdob »

Stauffenberg wrote:A major power surrenders to the country in change of the other side. For the Allies the sequence is:
* UK
* USA
* USSR

For USA to be used the UK must have surrendered. For USSR to be used then both UK and USA must have been surrendered.

For the Axis the sequence is:
* Germany
* Italy
Does it work the same for minor countries:
a) that have been conquered
b) that joined the side
?
Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few.
Post Reply

Return to “Commander Europe at War : GS Open Beta”