Tibetan question

bahdahbum · Post by **bahdahbum** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 4:07 pm

The tibetan may have allies but the price you pay for the ALLY general is the same as for a "regular" general ( see nepalese ally ) . So I suppose that that particular "ally" general act as a "normal" general for your army and that all generals influence the "ally" . So it is not a real ally but a sub state army included in your main army .

Scrumpy · Post by **Scrumpy** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 5:04 pm

Suspect it is a typo.

bahdahbum · Post by **bahdahbum** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 6:43 pm

Still there is no errata about it . If you pay the full price it is included in the army ...

nikgaukroger · Post by **nikgaukroger** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 6:57 pm

It is, of course, obviously an error in the points that will need to be included in a future errata update. If there is a thread for possible errata can you pop this in there, or if there sin't start one so it doesn't get lost. (Add in any others that may have been identified since the last errata update as they may have been missed)

hazelbark · Post by **hazelbark** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:58 pm

nikgaukroger wrote:It is, of course, obviously an error in the points that will need to be included in a future errata update. If there is a thread for possible errata can you pop this in there, or if there sin't start one so it doesn't get lost. (Add in any others that may have been identified since the last errata update as they may have been missed)

Well there are a ton in the rules section.

grahambriggs · Post by **grahambriggs** » Wed Dec 14, 2011 12:13 pm

Ma y I be the first to say that this is anNepali error?

Lycanthropic · Post by **Lycanthropic** » Wed Dec 28, 2011 9:02 pm