Warring States Chinese VS Palmyran

Forum for anyone to post reports of their battles and pictures, otherwise known as After Action Reports.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

Post Reply
frederic
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Posts: 628
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:29 am

Warring States Chinese VS Palmyran

Post by frederic »

http://www.miniatures4wargamers.com/bat ... _palmyran/

There's a long time I want to make such a battle report.
To defend my point of view about V2, I finally do it spending all saturday afternoon for the game and all sunday for the report.
berthier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
Posts: 781
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:01 am
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Contact:

Post by berthier »

Excellent report. And I agree with your final analysis about shooting.
Christopher Anders
http://bloodsandsteel.blogspot.com
DeadKraken
Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:51 pm

Post by DeadKraken »

Fantastic AAR, being a complete FOG noob (with 6 Chinese armies waiting to be used) its nice to see them in your AAR, quite informative, great stuff.
madaxeman
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3002
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 5:15 am
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Post by madaxeman »

Nice report!

Not sure what your point is about shooting though - the Chinese are probably one of the best armies to fight a Parthian style army with?
http://www.madaxeman.com
Holiday in Devon? Try https://www.thecaptainscottagebrixham.com
Misericordia
Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 3:50 pm

Post by Misericordia »

Thank you for the AAR. These are always fun to read and yours is well done.

As to your point regarding shooting, I agree with you. Having faced heavy foot armies with no ability to concentrate fire sufficiently is no fun. Rather makes one wonder how the Mongols and Huns did so well.
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3068
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Post by grahambriggs »

Misericordia wrote:Thank you for the AAR. These are always fun to read and yours is well done.

As to your point regarding shooting, I agree with you. Having faced heavy foot armies with no ability to concentrate fire sufficiently is no fun. Rather makes one wonder how the Mongols and Huns did so well.
I think most people would feel that the huns and mongols have the advantage over heavy foot armies in an equal points game.
Misericordia
Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 3:50 pm

Post by Misericordia »

"I think most people would feel that the huns and mongols have the advantage over heavy foot armies in an equal points game."

Perhaps. I have only played around 20 games. Most of those have been in tournaments. I have tried several Arab variants, Ottoman Turks and Comnenan Byzantines with a large compliment of LH.

Here in the US, I invariably face some type of HF with rear support and an IC. It has proven nearly impossible to shoot these troops down. I have been forced to fight hand to hand. Not my cup of tea really. In hand to hand my opponent invariably has the POA(s).

Recently I faced a Ptolemaic player with sufficient Pike Blocks to literally cover the table edge to edge while in hub to hub contact. He also had an IC and thorakitai for rear support.

What's a bloke to do?

My thoughts were some form of terrain (in this instance we played on a pre-set tables and our table literally had no terrain on his side), or perhaps an attempt at a flank march.

I'm open to suggestions.
Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory AAR's”