Kings of the Castle Pairs
Moderators: Slitherine Core, NewRoSoft, FoG PC Moderator
Kings of the Castle Pairs
Dear FOG addicts, this contest is based on the kids game where the Kings of the Castle take on all comers (I am the King of the castle and your a dirty rascal).
It is a pairs event. The reigning Kings pair accept challenges from pairs wanting to knock them off to become the new Kings. Challenges can take any form - points size, book restriction, FOW, double moves, paired scenario matches ... The 2 games do not have to be the same points or structure.
Winning team is determined as follows
- both players win their game (no paired scenario chosen)
- one win each --> biggest overall BG's kill differential ratio wins (no paired scenario chosen)
- if a paired scenario is chosen as one of the matches then the winner of a match is the winner of both scenario games, or if the match is split the winner is the player with the higher combined BG differential
- where a paired scenario is part of a win each between the pairs then the overall BG's kill differential ration will take into account all games
I hope the above works out, I have not thought about it too much and it can be tweaked after more consideration.
As the initiator of this contest my brother (pantherboy) and I (CheAhn) will be the inaugural Kings.
This thread should be used for any messages - general discussion and battle outcomes including battle reports. I will set up another post to hold the queue of challengers. This will be edited when the results come through as a running record of the performance of Kings and challengers. Update of this forum with results will be the responsibility of winning pair (if there is disagreement in calculating the winner I will arbitrate). Challengers should simply add the names of their pair to the queue.
See you on the field of glory, and best of luck to all.
It is a pairs event. The reigning Kings pair accept challenges from pairs wanting to knock them off to become the new Kings. Challenges can take any form - points size, book restriction, FOW, double moves, paired scenario matches ... The 2 games do not have to be the same points or structure.
Winning team is determined as follows
- both players win their game (no paired scenario chosen)
- one win each --> biggest overall BG's kill differential ratio wins (no paired scenario chosen)
- if a paired scenario is chosen as one of the matches then the winner of a match is the winner of both scenario games, or if the match is split the winner is the player with the higher combined BG differential
- where a paired scenario is part of a win each between the pairs then the overall BG's kill differential ration will take into account all games
I hope the above works out, I have not thought about it too much and it can be tweaked after more consideration.
As the initiator of this contest my brother (pantherboy) and I (CheAhn) will be the inaugural Kings.
This thread should be used for any messages - general discussion and battle outcomes including battle reports. I will set up another post to hold the queue of challengers. This will be edited when the results come through as a running record of the performance of Kings and challengers. Update of this forum with results will be the responsibility of winning pair (if there is disagreement in calculating the winner I will arbitrate). Challengers should simply add the names of their pair to the queue.
See you on the field of glory, and best of luck to all.
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: Kings of the Castle Pairs
As 99% of us don't stand a chance against your pairing I think you might be the only kings, never mind the inaugural ones.CheAhn wrote: As the initiator of this contest my brother (pantherboy) and I (CheAhn) will be the inaugural Kings.
-
petergarnett
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:01 pm
- Location: Gatwick, UK
-
TheGrayMouser
- Field Marshal - Me 410A

- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:42 pm
I am prepared to give it a whirl GM - if you will have me!TheGrayMouser wrote:Although i agree with the above sentiments, no reason not to at least try.... The challengers at least can call the shots on type of match armies restrictions etc , the Kings only get the hill![]()
Any one interested in teaming up with myself for go ?
Sounds like a proposal.
-
TheGrayMouser
- Field Marshal - Me 410A

- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:42 pm
Awsome, pm me with any thoughts on match ups armies etc, cheers!Triarius wrote:I am prepared to give it a whirl GM - if you will have me!TheGrayMouser wrote:Although i agree with the above sentiments, no reason not to at least try.... The challengers at least can call the shots on type of match armies restrictions etc , the Kings only get the hill![]()
Any one interested in teaming up with myself for go ?
Sounds like a proposal.
StockwellPete if your game lets try and take these wally's down....
And nope being a mere peasant I have no idea who I'm talking abou and everything to gain...bring on the revolution overthrow the monarchy freedom to the people
If pete chooses discretion over valour anyone wanting a rampant revolutionary on your side drop me a PM
And nope being a mere peasant I have no idea who I'm talking abou and everything to gain...bring on the revolution overthrow the monarchy freedom to the people
If pete chooses discretion over valour anyone wanting a rampant revolutionary on your side drop me a PM
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Erm . . .rexhurley wrote:StockwellPete if your game lets try and take these wally's down....
And nope being a mere peasant I have no idea who I'm talking abou and everything to gain...bring on the revolution overthrow the monarchy freedom to the people![]()
![]()
If pete chooses discretion over valour anyone wanting a rampant revolutionary on your side drop me a PM
stockwellpete wrote:Erm . . .rexhurley wrote:StockwellPete if your game lets try and take these wally's down....
And nope being a mere peasant I have no idea who I'm talking abou and everything to gain...bring on the revolution overthrow the monarchy freedom to the people![]()
![]()
If pete chooses discretion over valour anyone wanting a rampant revolutionary on your side drop me a PMRex, my next scheduled thrashing by pantherboy and his brother CheAhn is in my diary for July when LOEG Season 6 starts. Seeing as I still have the plaster casts on from the last time I played these two superb players, I am going to politely decline this time. I am sure you will find someone else to join you soon. Frank? Russ?
No problem cuz have a good one
-
TheGrayMouser
- Field Marshal - Me 410A

- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:42 pm
apologies, but Triarius appears to have taken a vacation (hasnt answered PM)
Dont want to hold up the Q....
perhaps a suggestion for challengers: You only are entered in the Q when you actually post on the board a challenge with armies , rules and players??
Anyways , if a team wants to jump ahead feel free to do so to get this rolling...
Dont want to hold up the Q....
perhaps a suggestion for challengers: You only are entered in the Q when you actually post on the board a challenge with armies , rules and players??
Anyways , if a team wants to jump ahead feel free to do so to get this rolling...
Sorry GM - have PM'd back now - busy two days back at work after a lay off.TheGrayMouser wrote:apologies, but Triarius appears to have taken a vacation (hasnt answered PM)
Dont want to hold up the Q....
perhaps a suggestion for challengers: You only are entered in the Q when you actually post on the board a challenge with armies , rules and players??
Anyways , if a team wants to jump ahead feel free to do so to get this rolling...
T
-
TheGrayMouser
- Field Marshal - Me 410A

- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:42 pm
Welcome back T
ok Hill hogs, here is the challenge
Mid Republican Rome vs Early Seleucids (both from RoR)
rules
600 aps
no allies
3 leaders minimum
mixed or better terrain (better meaning open /very open)
dm's /fow on
Triarius will issue a challenge for the army of his choice and either PB or Che can accept and play with the opposite army
ie
if Triarus picks Roman, then Roman vs Seluecid(either PB or Che)
my game will thus then be Seleucid(me) vs Roman(whomever doesnt take above)
Hope that makes sense....Cheers!
ok Hill hogs, here is the challenge
Mid Republican Rome vs Early Seleucids (both from RoR)
rules
600 aps
no allies
3 leaders minimum
mixed or better terrain (better meaning open /very open)
dm's /fow on
Triarius will issue a challenge for the army of his choice and either PB or Che can accept and play with the opposite army
ie
if Triarus picks Roman, then Roman vs Seluecid(either PB or Che)
my game will thus then be Seleucid(me) vs Roman(whomever doesnt take above)
Hope that makes sense....Cheers!
Triarius has issued a challenge using Seleucid pre 166BC at 600 points with 3 leaders and no allies and with pw = Hilltop.TheGrayMouser wrote:Welcome back T
ok Hill hogs, here is the challenge
Mid Republican Rome vs Early Seleucids (both from RoR)
rules
600 aps
no allies
3 leaders minimum
mixed or better terrain (better meaning open /very open)
dm's /fow on
Triarius will issue a challenge for the army of his choice and either PB or Che can accept and play with the opposite army
ie
if Triarus picks Roman, then Roman vs Seluecid(either PB or Che)
my game will thus then be Seleucid(me) vs Roman(whomever doesnt take above)
Hope that makes sense....Cheers!
Hilltop as seen from below that is
-
TheGrayMouser
- Field Marshal - Me 410A

- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:42 pm
-
pantherboy
- Tournament 3rd Place

- Posts: 1232
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 3:30 pm




