Bow* Lancer cavalry

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

Post Reply
Irmin
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Posts: 157
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 12:45 pm

Bow* Lancer cavalry

Post by Irmin »

Have been looking at the Jin army list and spotted Bow* Lancer cavalry on it, can somebody explain the benefit of Bow* for Shock Mounted troops who unless I CMT them every turn will charge if they have anybody in bow range.
expendablecinc
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 705
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:55 pm

Re: Bow* Lancer cavalry

Post by expendablecinc »

Irmin wrote:Have been looking at the Jin army list and spotted Bow* Lancer cavalry on it, can somebody explain the benefit of Bow* for Shock Mounted troops who unless I CMT them every turn will charge if they have anybody in bow range.
from my Byzantine experience:
- They are more versatile than straight lancers so you can park in front of troops and possibly still get somewhere. Particularly when LH come up hoping for two dice of shooting against your cav.
- They are usually drilled so they should be in a good position if you have used their drilledness well so nto that much of an issue if they charge witout orders
- They are usually drilled so are unlikely to charge without orders
- when are in front of enemy you can expand to get the shooters in front of things the lancers dotn like ro to try adn concentrate fire elsewhere.
- You are on equal or better footing that all straight lancer cavalry.
if you think of the lance as the primary weapon adn the bow as an extra the behaviour seems fine too.
Anthony
NeoAssyrian, Spartan, Scythian, Later Seleucid, Parthian, Thematic Byzantine, Latin Greek, Later Hungarian
elysiumsolutions@fsmail.n
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 93
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:17 am

Post by elysiumsolutions@fsmail.n »

Interesting troop type. You would shoot when you came into range and in your opponents turn then they may be disrupted when you charge. As you say you cannot guarantee being able to stand off and shoot.
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8840
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

The enemy just need to come to 5 MU and you are buggered. You can attempt not to charge, and then see 1 of your BG fail and get beaten piecemeal, or just charge and curse paying for the Bw*. Its rubbish.

(FAO RBS something about destroying carthage again)
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3079
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Post by grahambriggs »

Bow* whether mounted or foot seems a weak compromise. You don't get enough shooting power to do much but the cost of the capability means you have less troops when it comes to close combat. Shock troops with bow* get a particularly raw deal. As Phil says, any attempt to stand back and shoot weakly risks charging in piecemeal.
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”