Mixed formations Spearmen/bow

General discussion forum for anything related to Field of Glory Ancients & Medieval.

Moderators: terrys, hammy, philqw78, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
condotiero
Private First Class - Opel Blitz
Private First Class - Opel Blitz
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 2:45 pm

Mixed formations Spearmen/bow

Post by condotiero »

In my opinion, the game does not simulate the mixed pike/spear and bow/crossbow formations correctly. If they lose the spear POA, these formations will be often useless. I do not believe that the statement that they cancel the enemy's spear POA is always valid. What is the use of this, when they fight against bow-armed cavalry with bow (which is the most common cavalry in the game)? The most surrealistic example is the Persian Guard (Offensive Spearmen/Bow)... they are still shock troop!!! In my opinion, a better solution would be to change most of these formations to Defensive Spearmen/Bow*. In other cases (e.g., Italians and Poles), I think it would be better to improve their armour (at least that of the Spear-armed row). I still find it strange that troops behind a pavise are still considered Protected (especially regarding Missile attacks).

Srry for my english...
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3071
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Post by grahambriggs »

I agree that troops who would shoot from behind barricades (pavisiers, persian foot, etc.) are not well modelled at present.

It would be better if we had a solution that:

- gave good missile protection to frontal shooting
- gave reasonable protection in hand to hand, at least until the BG has to take a CHT for losing a fight.
- took some time to set up (like stakes do)

So I'm thinking something like:

-1 on shooting from the front.
- set up/take down same as stakes
- stops "open terrain" POAs as per stakes
- negates enemy armour POA
- removed if owning BG loses in impact melee
- costs points
simone
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:17 am

Post by simone »

Good points!
I was thinking of making a request like this. I especially found the Italian communal pavesari not well represented.
This was a static defensive formation used specifically to counter knights and missile fire.
It would be interesting to test a formation with 1/3 def. sp. and 2/3 cb. to simulate the firing capabilities.
It had a shield holder armed with short weapons, a spearman, and usually three or more crossbowmen positioned shoulder to shoulder to alternate loading and firing.
As described by Villari and in the Libro di Montaperti
Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion”