Table of Honour

[hidde]

[stockwellpete]

Hidde, I don't know if I am imagining things, but didn't you post up an "Olympic-style" LOEG medals table at one stage? I thought that it was a good idea at the time but I had one major difference with it.

The medal table reflected (quite logically) who came 1st, 2nd and 3rd in Division A of each expansion pack - but this made it of interest primarily to just a narrow band of the very top players. To have made it more interesting I thought that "gold medals" should be awarded to the winners of Div A, "silver medals" to the winners of Div B, and "bronze medals" to the winners of any other division. In this way you would get a broader range of names included in the table and it would have made it more interesting.

What do you think?

[stockwellpete]

Ah - I can see the medals table now in the first post.

[Morbio]

The results for Companions Cup II are available to be included too now.

[TheGrayMouser]

Hidde, I don't know if I am imagining things, but didn't you post up an "Olympic-style" LOEG medals table at one stage? I thought that it was a good idea at the time but I had one major difference with it.

The medal table reflected (quite logically) who came 1st, 2nd and 3rd in Division A of each expansion pack - but this made it of interest primarily to just a narrow band of the very top players. To have made it more interesting I thought that "gold medals" should be awarded to the winners of Div A, "silver medals" to the winners of Div B, and "bronze medals" to the winners of any other division. In this way you would get a broader range of names included in the table and it would have made it more interesting.

What do you think?

Hmm, if players are grouped in divisions based on skill/performance relative to others in a divison, methinks that achievement is the same for coming in ist second third regardless of if its the A , b etc... Thus all division placers should be eligable for the shiny trinkets.

[stockwellpete]

Hmm, if players are grouped in divisions based on skill/performance relative to others in a divison, methinks that achievement is the same for coming in ist second third regardless of if its the A , b etc... Thus all division placers should be eligable for the shiny trinkets.

Yes, I like your idea more than my own suggestion, TGM. That really would be a way of increasing interest in the table - and hopefully in the LOEG competition as a whole.

[hidde]

Hmm, if players are grouped in divisions based on skill/performance relative to others in a divison, methinks that achievement is the same for coming in ist second third regardless of if its the A , b etc... Thus all division placers should be eligable for the shiny trinkets.

Yes, I like your idea more than my own suggestion, TGM. That really would be a way of increasing interest in the table - and hopefully in the LOEG competition as a whole.

That's a good suggestion. I'll do that, CC and the rest when season 5 is over.

[TheGrayMouser]

Hmm, if players are grouped in divisions based on skill/performance relative to others in a divison, methinks that achievement is the same for coming in ist second third regardless of if its the A , b etc... Thus all division placers should be eligable for the shiny trinkets.

Yes, I like your idea more than my own suggestion, TGM. That really would be a way of increasing interest in the table - and hopefully in the LOEG competition as a whole.

That's a good suggestion. I'll do that, CC and the rest when season 5 is over.

hurray, now my glory day , season 2, E division will be immortalized

[hidde]

Yes, I like your idea more than my own suggestion, TGM. That really would be a way of increasing interest in the table - and hopefully in the LOEG competition as a whole.

That's a good suggestion. I'll do that, CC and the rest when season 5 is over.

hurray, now my glory day , season 2, E division will be immortalized

I'm sorry GTM but I kind of thought I should skip D & E divisions. They only existed the first two seasons and frankly, I doubt there will be more than three divisions in the vast majority of future Leagues.
If it does no problem to add them later

[hidde]

Updated
C-div to be added later.

[hidde]

Updated
For some reason the new stuff became smaller than before.
I'll try and find the problem and fix it soon.

[hidde]

Size fixed.
Some errors also fixed(thanks to med for spotting).
I hope and think there should be no more.

[hidde]

Updated.
Please report if spotting any error.

[Tiavals]

No shared victory positions for Div C Imperial?(I tied with Cytus)

[stockwellpete]

No shared victory positions for Div C Imperial?(I tied with Cytus)

Players level on points are split with reference to the "Kill ratio". There is a separate column in the table for that. It is like goal difference in football.

Anders, I can only see the left-hand side of your chart, I think.

[Tiavals]

So it's better to have an army that has high quality units as opposed to rabble? I guess it makes sense, since many armies can take loads of cheap filler.

[hidde]

Anders, I can only see the left-hand side of your chart, I think.

It's the new forum that have less space to display pictures. For some (stupid) reason the column with user name are much wider now.
I have already rearranged all the charts and on my screen all but the K-O chart are visible.
I belive all of that one can be seen if you have wide-screen and I don't think the text should be any smaller.
Or the designer could have thought of a scrollbar...

[hidde]

Updated.
Please report if spotting any error.

[FedeM]

At least I got a 3rd place

[hidde]

Update