Colonial Portuguese

Private forum for design team.

Moderators: nikgaukroger, rbodleyscott, Slitherine Core, FOGR Design

Post Reply
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28397
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Colonial Portuguese

Post by rbodleyscott »

I have not yet had the proofs of Colonies and Conquest, so if you wanted to squeeze a pike and shot option into the Colonial Portguese list - in the light of pippohispano's stuff - it might be possible.
Last edited by rbodleyscott on Fri Sep 24, 2010 10:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28397
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

There is a discussion in 2 threads:

Trade & Treachery
Early modern Portguese
robertthebruce
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 505
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:24 pm
Location: Granada, Spain.

Post by robertthebruce »

I will try to get some information about it, but I´m out this weekend and I will not be operational until Monday, I'm afraid.
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28397
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

robertthebruce wrote:I will try to get some information about it, but I´m out this weekend and I will not be operational until Monday, I'm afraid.
Thanks.

I have no idea when Osprey will send me the proofs for Book 4, but if we can get something done before then, and it doesn't occupy too much extra space to muck up the layout, I can probably get them to fit it in.

It probably will be fairly soon, as it is several weeks since I proof-read Book 3.
robertthebruce
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 505
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:24 pm
Location: Granada, Spain.

Post by robertthebruce »

Ok, I will try to be fast then.
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28397
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

Nik,

Please could you take a look at the threads discussing this, in case there is a simple way we can improve the Colonial Portuguese list (in Morocco) when I get the proofs back.

It seems that we would need
1) Some pike and shot BGs - problem being how these would evolve over time
2) Maybe1 BG of Gendarmes or other heavy horse
3) Increase the number of ginetes

The threads are:

trade & treachery
Early Modern Portuguese army

in the General discussion section

The simpler alternative (which is not to be preferred) might be to simply state that the list does not cover Morocco and remove the ginetes line.

--------------


David,

I don't know when I will receive the proofs from Osprey, but when I do I will have to return them within a day or two, so this matter is urgent - if you are able to spare any time.
robertthebruce
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 505
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:24 pm
Location: Granada, Spain.

Post by robertthebruce »

I was looking for information Richard, but I have to say that I have not found too much. I´m searching in portuguese sources. I will post all that I have this afternoon anyway.
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28397
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

robertthebruce wrote:I was looking for information Richard, but I have to say that I have not found too much. I´m searching in portuguese sources. I will post all that I have this afternoon anyway.
Thanks
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28397
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

The Book 4 proof has arrived! Time is therefore severely limited on any changes to the list.
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28397
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

I am coming round to the view that as time does not permit a considered analysis of the evidence, we need to cut our losses on the Colonial Portuguese list and say that it does not include Morocco (and remove the Ginetes line).

Then we can write a new list covering 16th century peninsular Portuguese armies, and those in Morocco, and put them in Book 6: Cities of Gold. (We can always note that they should not be included in the theme, but in a different theme, if we feel it necessary - I already think that Cities of Gold needs an Appendix 2 anyway - because its theme should include the Colonial Portuguese & Dutch at least).

Nik and David, what do you think of this idea?
robertthebruce
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 505
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:24 pm
Location: Granada, Spain.

Post by robertthebruce »

Richard, I think, this list is more complicated that it looks, It could be good idea to include it in cities of gold. In this period, Portugal is fucising their economic and militar power in the colonies, as America and africa.



And I have several ideas to change the list.


Basically:

In Africa:


Before 1578

Portuguese pikes
Ginetes
Detached arquebusiers and crossbows
Some heavy cavalry
Artillery
Not sure of the creation date for tercos

After 1578

Tercos (used in alcazarquibir and alcantara)
German, Italian, Dutch Mercenaries
Aventureiros
Cavaleiros
Artillery
Horse arquebusiers
Ginetes
Detached arquebusiers

Indonesia

Civilisados (Lower number than the actual list)
Non civilisados
Portuguese troops


India

Foot Portuguese

America

Portuguese Conquistadores



And some peninsular battles could be included.



I bet for the Richard Idea.
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28397
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

Well I think we have to keep the Colonial list in Colonies and Conquest - from your list it isn't too far wrong except for North Africa.

Then we can do another list for North Africa in Cities of Gold.
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28397
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

I propose changing the last sentence in the intro to the Colonial Portuguese list to:

“This list covers Portuguese colonial forces, except in Portugal and NW Africa, from 1494 to 1698.”

(N.B. NW Africa fudges the issue of the cavalry at Safim)

And remove the Ginetes line.

JD has agreed that we can add a Portugese in Morocco (and 16thC Portugal?) list to Cities of Gold.

I also suggest we change "Civilisados infantry" to "Portuguese and civilisados infantry" as "civilisados" appear to have been assimilated natives. [In main list, allies list and starter list]

Troop notes. Change first sentence to:

“Portuguese colonial soldiers had a reputation for being ill-disciplined, no doubt not helped by the fact they were poorly paid - what little pay they did receive being paid at irregular intervals.”

Add to end of troop notes:

"Civilisados were assimilated natives. By the second quarter of the 17th century a high proportion of the soldiers were convicts (degredados)."
robertthebruce
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 505
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:24 pm
Location: Granada, Spain.

Post by robertthebruce »

Good solution.
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

Looks a good solution to me.
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
youngr
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 8:10 am
Location: Presteigne

Post by youngr »

rbodleyscott wrote:I propose changing the last sentence in the intro to the Colonial Portuguese list to:

“This list covers Portuguese colonial forces, except in Portugal and NW Africa, from 1494 to 1698.”

(N.B. NW Africa fudges the issue of the cavalry at Safim)

And remove the Ginetes line.

JD has agreed that we can add a Portugese in Morocco (and 16thC Portugal?) list to Cities of Gold.

Perhaps the Colonial Portuguese list in Book 6 should include all of Africa? They are allies to several of the African lists / sub-lists
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28397
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

youngr wrote:Perhaps the Colonial Portuguese list in Book 6 should include all of Africa? They are allies to several of the African lists / sub-lists
The issue with Morocco is that the Portugese used standard pike and shot tercios there, as well as light and heavy cavalry.

We don't think they did any of these outside NW Africa - unless you have evidence to the contrary.

If we are right, the Colonial Portugese list in Book 4 will do for East Africa.
Post Reply

Return to “FoGR Lists”