Colonial Portuguese
Moderators: nikgaukroger, rbodleyscott, Slitherine Core, FOGR Design
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28397
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
Colonial Portuguese
I have not yet had the proofs of Colonies and Conquest, so if you wanted to squeeze a pike and shot option into the Colonial Portguese list - in the light of pippohispano's stuff - it might be possible.
Last edited by rbodleyscott on Fri Sep 24, 2010 10:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28397
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
-
robertthebruce
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 505
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:24 pm
- Location: Granada, Spain.
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28397
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
Thanks.robertthebruce wrote:I will try to get some information about it, but I´m out this weekend and I will not be operational until Monday, I'm afraid.
I have no idea when Osprey will send me the proofs for Book 4, but if we can get something done before then, and it doesn't occupy too much extra space to muck up the layout, I can probably get them to fit it in.
It probably will be fairly soon, as it is several weeks since I proof-read Book 3.
-
robertthebruce
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 505
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:24 pm
- Location: Granada, Spain.
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28397
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
Nik,
Please could you take a look at the threads discussing this, in case there is a simple way we can improve the Colonial Portuguese list (in Morocco) when I get the proofs back.
It seems that we would need
1) Some pike and shot BGs - problem being how these would evolve over time
2) Maybe1 BG of Gendarmes or other heavy horse
3) Increase the number of ginetes
The threads are:
trade & treachery
Early Modern Portuguese army
in the General discussion section
The simpler alternative (which is not to be preferred) might be to simply state that the list does not cover Morocco and remove the ginetes line.
--------------
David,
I don't know when I will receive the proofs from Osprey, but when I do I will have to return them within a day or two, so this matter is urgent - if you are able to spare any time.
Please could you take a look at the threads discussing this, in case there is a simple way we can improve the Colonial Portuguese list (in Morocco) when I get the proofs back.
It seems that we would need
1) Some pike and shot BGs - problem being how these would evolve over time
2) Maybe1 BG of Gendarmes or other heavy horse
3) Increase the number of ginetes
The threads are:
trade & treachery
Early Modern Portuguese army
in the General discussion section
The simpler alternative (which is not to be preferred) might be to simply state that the list does not cover Morocco and remove the ginetes line.
--------------
David,
I don't know when I will receive the proofs from Osprey, but when I do I will have to return them within a day or two, so this matter is urgent - if you are able to spare any time.
-
robertthebruce
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 505
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:24 pm
- Location: Granada, Spain.
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28397
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28397
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28397
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
I am coming round to the view that as time does not permit a considered analysis of the evidence, we need to cut our losses on the Colonial Portuguese list and say that it does not include Morocco (and remove the Ginetes line).
Then we can write a new list covering 16th century peninsular Portuguese armies, and those in Morocco, and put them in Book 6: Cities of Gold. (We can always note that they should not be included in the theme, but in a different theme, if we feel it necessary - I already think that Cities of Gold needs an Appendix 2 anyway - because its theme should include the Colonial Portuguese & Dutch at least).
Nik and David, what do you think of this idea?
Then we can write a new list covering 16th century peninsular Portuguese armies, and those in Morocco, and put them in Book 6: Cities of Gold. (We can always note that they should not be included in the theme, but in a different theme, if we feel it necessary - I already think that Cities of Gold needs an Appendix 2 anyway - because its theme should include the Colonial Portuguese & Dutch at least).
Nik and David, what do you think of this idea?
-
robertthebruce
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 505
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:24 pm
- Location: Granada, Spain.
Richard, I think, this list is more complicated that it looks, It could be good idea to include it in cities of gold. In this period, Portugal is fucising their economic and militar power in the colonies, as America and africa.
And I have several ideas to change the list.
Basically:
In Africa:
Before 1578
Portuguese pikes
Ginetes
Detached arquebusiers and crossbows
Some heavy cavalry
Artillery
Not sure of the creation date for tercos
After 1578
Tercos (used in alcazarquibir and alcantara)
German, Italian, Dutch Mercenaries
Aventureiros
Cavaleiros
Artillery
Horse arquebusiers
Ginetes
Detached arquebusiers
Indonesia
Civilisados (Lower number than the actual list)
Non civilisados
Portuguese troops
India
Foot Portuguese
America
Portuguese Conquistadores
And some peninsular battles could be included.
I bet for the Richard Idea.
And I have several ideas to change the list.
Basically:
In Africa:
Before 1578
Portuguese pikes
Ginetes
Detached arquebusiers and crossbows
Some heavy cavalry
Artillery
Not sure of the creation date for tercos
After 1578
Tercos (used in alcazarquibir and alcantara)
German, Italian, Dutch Mercenaries
Aventureiros
Cavaleiros
Artillery
Horse arquebusiers
Ginetes
Detached arquebusiers
Indonesia
Civilisados (Lower number than the actual list)
Non civilisados
Portuguese troops
India
Foot Portuguese
America
Portuguese Conquistadores
And some peninsular battles could be included.
I bet for the Richard Idea.
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28397
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28397
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
I propose changing the last sentence in the intro to the Colonial Portuguese list to:
“This list covers Portuguese colonial forces, except in Portugal and NW Africa, from 1494 to 1698.”
(N.B. NW Africa fudges the issue of the cavalry at Safim)
And remove the Ginetes line.
JD has agreed that we can add a Portugese in Morocco (and 16thC Portugal?) list to Cities of Gold.
I also suggest we change "Civilisados infantry" to "Portuguese and civilisados infantry" as "civilisados" appear to have been assimilated natives. [In main list, allies list and starter list]
Troop notes. Change first sentence to:
“Portuguese colonial soldiers had a reputation for being ill-disciplined, no doubt not helped by the fact they were poorly paid - what little pay they did receive being paid at irregular intervals.”
Add to end of troop notes:
"Civilisados were assimilated natives. By the second quarter of the 17th century a high proportion of the soldiers were convicts (degredados)."
“This list covers Portuguese colonial forces, except in Portugal and NW Africa, from 1494 to 1698.”
(N.B. NW Africa fudges the issue of the cavalry at Safim)
And remove the Ginetes line.
JD has agreed that we can add a Portugese in Morocco (and 16thC Portugal?) list to Cities of Gold.
I also suggest we change "Civilisados infantry" to "Portuguese and civilisados infantry" as "civilisados" appear to have been assimilated natives. [In main list, allies list and starter list]
Troop notes. Change first sentence to:
“Portuguese colonial soldiers had a reputation for being ill-disciplined, no doubt not helped by the fact they were poorly paid - what little pay they did receive being paid at irregular intervals.”
Add to end of troop notes:
"Civilisados were assimilated natives. By the second quarter of the 17th century a high proportion of the soldiers were convicts (degredados)."
-
robertthebruce
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 505
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:24 pm
- Location: Granada, Spain.
-
nikgaukroger
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 10287
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: LarryWorld
rbodleyscott wrote:I propose changing the last sentence in the intro to the Colonial Portuguese list to:
“This list covers Portuguese colonial forces, except in Portugal and NW Africa, from 1494 to 1698.”
(N.B. NW Africa fudges the issue of the cavalry at Safim)
And remove the Ginetes line.
JD has agreed that we can add a Portugese in Morocco (and 16thC Portugal?) list to Cities of Gold.
Perhaps the Colonial Portuguese list in Book 6 should include all of Africa? They are allies to several of the African lists / sub-lists
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28397
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
The issue with Morocco is that the Portugese used standard pike and shot tercios there, as well as light and heavy cavalry.youngr wrote:Perhaps the Colonial Portuguese list in Book 6 should include all of Africa? They are allies to several of the African lists / sub-lists
We don't think they did any of these outside NW Africa - unless you have evidence to the contrary.
If we are right, the Colonial Portugese list in Book 4 will do for East Africa.
