Wars of Religion Companion 1 Errata Detected?
Moderators: terrys, Slitherine Core, FOGR Design
-
timmy1
- Lieutenant-General - Nashorn

- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
- Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England
Wars of Religion Companion 1 Errata Detected?
Later 80YW Dutch - page 8
1, French Allies 'only from 1621to1639' should read 'only from 1621 to 1639' .
2, More importantly, Field Fortifications is missing Points per Base, should be 3.
1, French Allies 'only from 1621to1639' should read 'only from 1621 to 1639' .
2, More importantly, Field Fortifications is missing Points per Base, should be 3.
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28411
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28411
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
-
timmy1
- Lieutenant-General - Nashorn

- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
- Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England
Drats - Mick you beat me to that one... and after what you said at Britcon.
Page 65 - heading says Scots Covenantor, as does the coloured border. The Index lists them as starting on Page 65. However all of these are incorrect. They start on P66. P65 is Thirty Years War Peninsular Spanish. This is an army I am THRILLED to see. Biggest ommission from DBR and what my PoW Spanish will now become.
However there is a teenie-weenie error.
"Temporary" or "Auxiliary" tercios Only before 1637 HF, Armoured, Poo, Pike Pike are listed as 3 per base. I make it 4. I hope they ARE 3 points per base as it makes the list more interesting.
Just noticed that on the same page there are 3 HF Pike Pike lines with no Quality given. From the 'no mixed quality BGs rule' I surmise that they should all be Average. One has Blank and the other 2 have '-'. Let me know if you need me to point it out more precisely.
Page 65 - heading says Scots Covenantor, as does the coloured border. The Index lists them as starting on Page 65. However all of these are incorrect. They start on P66. P65 is Thirty Years War Peninsular Spanish. This is an army I am THRILLED to see. Biggest ommission from DBR and what my PoW Spanish will now become.
However there is a teenie-weenie error.
"Temporary" or "Auxiliary" tercios Only before 1637 HF, Armoured, Poo, Pike Pike are listed as 3 per base. I make it 4. I hope they ARE 3 points per base as it makes the list more interesting.
Just noticed that on the same page there are 3 HF Pike Pike lines with no Quality given. From the 'no mixed quality BGs rule' I surmise that they should all be Average. One has Blank and the other 2 have '-'. Let me know if you need me to point it out more precisely.
-
Blathergut
- Field Marshal - Elefant

- Posts: 5882
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
-
Sarmaticus
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF

- Posts: 275
- Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 4:31 pm
This doesn't bear on the rules so you might want to skip this but there's an error in the history section of the Early Thirty Years' War German Catholic list: IIRC by the Golden Bull of Prague, the Duke of Bavaria didn't have an electoral vote until he gained the Palatine vote from his Wittelsbach cousin (much as the Emperor had transferrd the Wettin votein the mid C16th).
The Electoral College had three Catholics (Bishops of Mainz, Trier and Cologne), two Lutherans (Saxony and Brandenburg), and the King of Bohemia. The last was only amember of the college for the purpose of electing the Emperor and the throne of Bohemia was itself elective. The Palatine Elector as King of Bohemia would have had two votes.
Catholics might dread a Protestant majority in the college, the Lutherans equality of Calvinists; The Bavarian branch had a longrunning feud with the Palatine branch and the Habsburgs reason enough to be miffed at being kicked out of Bohemia.
The legal situation was difficult because, in the event of a dispute between the Electors, the Emperor was to be arbiter; if the Emperor was himself a party, the Elector Palatine was to decide the case ....
The Electoral College had three Catholics (Bishops of Mainz, Trier and Cologne), two Lutherans (Saxony and Brandenburg), and the King of Bohemia. The last was only amember of the college for the purpose of electing the Emperor and the throne of Bohemia was itself elective. The Palatine Elector as King of Bohemia would have had two votes.
Catholics might dread a Protestant majority in the college, the Lutherans equality of Calvinists; The Bavarian branch had a longrunning feud with the Palatine branch and the Habsburgs reason enough to be miffed at being kicked out of Bohemia.
The legal situation was difficult because, in the event of a dispute between the Electors, the Emperor was to be arbiter; if the Emperor was himself a party, the Elector Palatine was to decide the case ....
-
Sarmaticus
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF

- Posts: 275
- Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 4:31 pm
Correcting my clever-clogs self here but, of course, Barandenburg's Elector, at least, had been Calvinist since 1613. So there were already two Calvinist votes and there threatened to be three. Repairing my greenhouse hereSarmaticus wrote: The Electoral College had three Catholics (Bishops of Mainz, Trier and Cologne), two Lutherans (Saxony and Brandenburg), and the King of Bohemia. The last was only amember of the college for the purpose of electing the Emperor and the throne of Bohemia was itself elective. The Palatine Elector as King of Bohemia would have had two votes.
-
timmy1
- Lieutenant-General - Nashorn

- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
- Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England
[quote="rbodleyscott"][quote="jonphilp"]I have just started to use FOG R and I am enjoying the rule set.it is the best set I have seen covering this period. With my interest rediscovered in this period, I am looking to build an army from "Wars of Religion" and am looking at the Early Louis XIV army . Can someone confirm if the Cavaliers in this list should be classed as impact mounted/Swordsmen as in the main army list or Impact mounted /melee pistol as stipulated in the starter army and French Allied list.[/quote]
I am surprised that nobody has picked up on this before.
Another one for the errata, once Nik clarifies his intentions.[/quote]
The man from Del Monte says - Swordsmen.
I am surprised that nobody has picked up on this before.
Another one for the errata, once Nik clarifies his intentions.[/quote]
The man from Del Monte says - Swordsmen.
-
timmy1
- Lieutenant-General - Nashorn

- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
- Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England
[quote="rbodleyscott"][quote="timmy1"]The Early Thirty Years' War German Catholic Allies allows GC option in addition to FC/TC. It is the only list in Companion 1 that allows this. What is that meant to represent? Two ICs make for an interesting game.[/quote]
A cut and paste error, sadly. As the points values indicate.[/quote]
A cut and paste error, sadly. As the points values indicate.[/quote]
-
MatteoPasi
- Colonel - Ju 88A

- Posts: 1534
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 7:17 pm
- Location: Faenza - Italia
-
deadtorius
- Field Marshal - Me 410A

- Posts: 5290
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28411
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
Thanks, but could we please try to keep rules errata items in the appropriate thread.deadtorius wrote:25MM based figures using 1" MU's can not clear an artillery base if they start behind it.
25mm artillery is 80MM deep, MF can only move 75MM.
15MM players don't have this issue as their move will easily clear a 60MM arty base.
I would imagine the 40MM MU's do not have this problem either.
