Timariot sipahis

Private forum for design team.

Moderators: rbodleyscott, nikgaukroger, Slitherine Core, FOGR Design

Post Reply
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28429
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Timariot sipahis

Post by rbodleyscott »

Nik, you changed the special instructions to say:

 No more than one-third of the army’s Roumeliot Timariot battle groups can be superior.
 No more than one-third of the army’s Anatolian Timariot battle groups can be superior.

In my view this is too stringent because it means that you must have 5 BGs of Timariots to get 1 BG of Superior Rumeliots.

i.e.

1 BG Superior Rumeliot
2 BG Average Rumeliot
2 BG Average Anatolian

(since you can only have 1 less Anatolian than Rumeliot)

I suggest that we stick to the old version:

 No more than one-third of the army’s Timariot battle groups can be superior.

This allows you to have

1 BG Superior Rumeliot
1 BG Average Rumeliot
1 BG Average Anatolian

This hardly seems excessively generous to me.
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28429
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

BTW I assume it isn't intentional that the Later Ottomans have more HA sipahis than the Early, so I have changed it to 0-6.
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

It was deliberate.

I am worried about too many superior carbine shooters (in addition, we must remember, to the Qapu Khalqi) making the army too effective. We have previously discussed about the undesirability of Ottomans being the super army as they may be in FoG:AM.

With the unmodified Death Role in FoG:R superior and elite shooter are, IMO, very dangerous in terms of base losses, and the game has a lot of 6 and 4 base BGs.
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28429
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

nikgaukroger wrote:It was deliberate.

I am worried about too many superior carbine shooters (in addition, we must remember, to the Qapu Khalqi) making the army too effective. We have previously discussed about the undesirability of Ottomans being the super army as they may be in FoG:AM.

With the unmodified Death Role in FoG:R superior and elite shooter are, IMO, very dangerous in terms of base losses, and the game has a lot of 6 and 4 base BGs.
Hmm, well OK.
SirGarnet
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Posts: 2186
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:13 am

Post by SirGarnet »

Bows need a critical mass to get death roll chances, but firearms are linear.

Carbines hit most things on a 5-6.

An Elite Sipahi base has (1/3 + 2/6*1/3) * 1/6 = 8/108 lethality (chance of causing a base loss)
Superior has (1/3 + 1/6*1/3)*1/6 = 7/108
Average has(1/3 + 0/6*1/3)*1/6 =6/108
Poor has (1/6 + 1/6*1/3)*1/6 =4/108

On raw lethality, the Elites are 33% better than than the Average, the Superiors 17%.

Elite cost 22, Superior cost 19, Average cost 12, Poor cost 9

Lethality per army point spent
Elite 0.34%
Superior 0.34%
Average 0.46%
Poor 0.41%

Imperialist musketeer lethality is 6/108 and, costing 8 points in mixed BG, lethality is 0.69% per point.
And the noblest Qapu Khalqi dies as easily to shot as the timid Timariot.
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28429
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

Just played a game of Later Ottoman vs TYW German.

Ottomans lost fairly handily.

As Mike says, tis the death rolls that are the killer.

I don't think we need fear the Ottomans being too good now.

(So maybe the Superior Timariot rules could be a bit more lenient).
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

rbodleyscott wrote:Just played a game of Later Ottoman vs TYW German.

Ottomans lost fairly handily.

As Mike says, tis the death rolls that are the killer.

I don't think we need fear the Ottomans being too good now.

(So maybe the Superior Timariot rules could be a bit more lenient).
As you have seen them on the table top in their new format (I assume you used that), I will leave it up to your judgement as to what is most appropriate and to make the relevant changes when I next zap you a draft.
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28429
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

nikgaukroger wrote:
rbodleyscott wrote:Just played a game of Later Ottoman vs TYW German.

Ottomans lost fairly handily.

As Mike says, tis the death rolls that are the killer.

I don't think we need fear the Ottomans being too good now.

(So maybe the Superior Timariot rules could be a bit more lenient).
As you have seen them on the table top in their new format (I assume you used that), I will leave it up to your judgement as to what is most appropriate and to make the relevant changes when I next zap you a draft.
I had 3 BGs of Elites, and they did not do too well, because of the Death Rolls.

As Mike says, I don't think Superior/Elite Carbines are that Super.


However, given the increase in the number of Qapu khalki since the Beta list, I suppose it is probably best to leave it as you have it.
Post Reply

Return to “FoGR Lists”