Potential error in RoR Late Rep Roman list

[Lupus]

I know that the Roman Cavalry types in the TT Roman list have no specific name, but the naming convention in RoR seems odd.

Here we have:

Veteran Heavy Cav / Armoured / Superior Experience
Heavy Cav / Protected / Superior Experience
Veteran Cav / Armoured / Average Experience
Cavalry / Protected / Average Experience

To me, it would seem more logical, if the Status veteran yes/no points to experience and heavy yes/no points to armour

This would mean the list should look like:

Veteran Heavy Cav / Armoured / Superior Experience
Veteran Cav / Protected / Superior Experience
Heavy Cav / Armoured / Average Experience
Cavalry / Protected / Average Experience

This, of course, makes no difference in game mechanics, but when I look to one of the unit names, I simply expect other values..

Comments?

Rgds

L

[petergarnett]

I feel the same way.

[arsan]

+1
Surely is a mistake, like the reversed hastati and Princeps in mid-repubican list.
Surely it has no effect on game play as the cost reflects the BG capabilities but its looks weird.

[IainMcNeil]

Its a mistake - it will be fixed!

[keithmartinsmith]

This was covered on another thread and addressed already, Thanks for the feedback. Keith