Conforming to Battlewagons

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

Post Reply
gozerius
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:32 am

Conforming to Battlewagons

Post by gozerius »

Which edge has priority when conforming to a freshly contacted BW BG?

A - the "front" edge (as depicted on the base)
B - a long edge that has been contacted
C - the one which requires the shortest move by a base in contact.

Also, if a BW BG is already fighting on one of its edges, must a charging BG meet the "legal flank charge" requirements to contact a different edge?
Does that also apply to charging a BG in "orb" formation?

Are any BGs not normally subject to penalties for being charged in the flank affected by the -1 CT for having a threatened flank, outside of the automatic one when within 6 MU of the table edge?
rogerg
Captain - Bf 110D
Captain - Bf 110D
Posts: 855
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 1:02 pm
Location: Halifax, Yorkshire

Post by rogerg »

Without the rules with me, I would assume the conform is by the shortest possible move, 'C'. I do not recall there being any rule about conforming to the front edge.

If a BG cannot be charged in flank, then it cannot take a -1 for a BG able to charge it in the flank.
recharge
Sergeant - Panzer IIC
Sergeant - Panzer IIC
Posts: 195
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:04 pm

Post by recharge »

I don't have the rules infront of me either; but I recall that BW do not suffer a penalty from flank charges; ie. no flanks..
:?:
John
gozerius
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:32 am

Post by gozerius »

The lack of a penalty for being charged in the flank does not necessarily mean that a BG has no flank. Troops behind fortifications suffer no penalty for being charged in the flank across said fortifications. But they still have a flank, and must turn to respond to a flank contact. Troops in Orb can be contacted on a flank or rear facing, but suffer no adverse penalty. In close combat they fight with a quarter of their total bases per facing.
Battle wagons have a whole slew of special exceptions to the normal rules for movement and combat, but they are scattered all over the rulebook, and some exist only in the FAQ. They share some charactaristics of troops defending fortifications and some of troops in ORB. Some of these are listed in the rulebook, but, the description in the FAQ on how BW fight attributes abilities and conditions which are not explicitly defined in the rulebook. For example, page 92 in the rulebook says that a base in melee with enemy in front edge contact with its front and flank or rear fights the enemy base in contact with its front, although all the enemy bases will fight it. It then goes on to say that a BW base counts as two bases side when fighting on a long edge, one base if fighting on a short edge. And that a BG of BW fighting on a long edge count that file as the front rank. The FAQ indicates that ALL edges of a BW BG count as the front edge for close combat purposes, and a BW base must fight in two directions, splitting its dice, in the melee phase if so contacted. Troops in ORB and troops behind fortifications never suffer a penalty for fighting in more than one direction, but Battle Wagons are not explicitly exempted from the penalty in either the rulebook or the FAQ.
I'm just trying to fill in the blanks.
pbrandon
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Posts: 204
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 1:08 pm

Post by pbrandon »

I do have the rules with me :)

Page 56. "Battle wagons (and some others) never count as being charged in flank or rear."

Paul
gozerius
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:32 am

Post by gozerius »

I got that. My question has to do with the restriction on charging a BG that is already engaged to its front. How is "front defined for BW?
I know that for movement the front is the short edge at the front of the model (where the draft animals are). I know that I can count either long edge as the front for shooting purposes. But "front" for the purposes of close combat is nebulous. The rules state that if fighting on a long edge each BW counts as two bases side by side, and if fighting on a short edge they count as only one, and that if fighting on a long edge that file was considered the front rank. When read in relation to the immediately preceding statement regarding bases with enemy on more than one edge, I assumed that BW could choose which edge counted as "front", as with shooting. This has implications for charging additional BGs into contact. But the FAQ says that BW with enemy on more than one edge must fight on both edges, suggesting that BW count ALL edges as "front". So I'm seeking clarification. If BW do indeed treat ALL edges as front for close combat purposes, how do the normal rules for close combat apply to BW? And why make reference to front rank?
rogerg
Captain - Bf 110D
Captain - Bf 110D
Posts: 855
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 1:02 pm
Location: Halifax, Yorkshire

Post by rogerg »

One would presume that the normal rules apply. To charge into a second edge of a battlewagon would require a base entirely behind the edge already in contact, as in a flank charge. The first two ranks in combat are not eligible targets otherwise. Once in contact, the second edge would count as a front edge. I do not believe that the wagons would count as fighting in two directions though, because the bases will not have turned. (I might be wrong here, but I think the rule requires bases to turn before this applies) My assumption is that the wagon 'on the corner' fights as one base in each direction much as two separate elements would do.

In the above situation, the wagons have two front edges. The rules state that to be 'behind the flank' in such situation the enemy must be in the quadrant behind both edges.
deadtorius
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Posts: 5286
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am

Post by deadtorius »

Of course the easiest solution of all is to not bother taking the wagons in the first place and thus not having to worry about it. Not sure if I will try my hand at bullock wagons in the Indian army after all. Quite confusing, but perhaps if you have them in front of you it is a little easier.
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”