Nepalese in Tibetan list

General discussion forum for anything related to Field of Glory Ancients & Medieval.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
khurasan_miniatures
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 480
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 3:32 am

Nepalese in Tibetan list

Post by khurasan_miniatures »

(also posted this on the yahoo group)

Here's one set of models I'm glad I didn't have made before the book came out! :) These are
armoured or protected cavalry with a bow.

I assume the armament is based on the illustration in Allard's old slingshot article,
although Duncan Head's not found the source for that illustration and instead
recreates the Nepalese horsemen with spear and shield. No matter, they are "Bow" cav,
and that works for DBMM too, as Cv are Cv, so bow it is! :wink:

Question for FoG mavens as I move these lads up the production chart: should
they be armoured or unarmoured? Can't make both, sorry to say. Which would you
rather field as allies in a Tibetan army? Perhaps protected, because you can
have more of them to offset the smallness of the tibetan army?
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

Armoured, otherwise they would be a weak point that gets picked on. Though the abbasids would be more useful as, sort of filler, and average cavalry, especially undrilled are weak anyway, so I would be unlikely to use them.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
khurasan_miniatures
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 480
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 3:32 am

Post by khurasan_miniatures »

philqw78 wrote:Armoured, otherwise they would be a weak point that gets picked on. Though the abbasids would be more useful as, sort of filler, and average cavalry, especially undrilled are weak anyway, so I would be unlikely to use them.
Cheers for that, perhaps it's not worth the investment making them. It's possible that once you've gone Tibet, it's best to go all the way, and use small numbers of heavily armoured cavalry.
Spartacus
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Posts: 243
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 6:36 pm
Location: Villefranche De Rouergue

Post by Spartacus »

khurasan_miniatures wrote:
Cheers for that, perhaps it's not worth the investment making them. It's possible that once you've gone Tibet, it's best to go all the way, and use small numbers of heavily armoured cavalry.
Yes! Exactly the way I went.
--Terry--
khurasan_miniatures
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 480
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 3:32 am

Post by khurasan_miniatures »

Spartacus wrote:
khurasan_miniatures wrote:
Cheers for that, perhaps it's not worth the investment making them. It's possible that once you've gone Tibet, it's best to go all the way, and use small numbers of heavily armoured cavalry.
Yes! Exactly the way I went.
Terry, I was impressed by how quickly you were making them. Have you has the chance to use them yet? Curious to know how they do in FoG.
Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion”