Charge target

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
madcam2us
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:54 am
Location: Searching for the meaning of "Authors Intent"

Charge target

Post by madcam2us »

(a 4x2BG) is in melee to its front with an enemy BG - 2. Off to one side is an enemy BG - 1 that wishes to charge the engaged BG.


_________22__
1111_____22__
_________aaaa
_________aaaa

BG 1 doesn't qualify for a flank vs BG(a)

Can the rear element -(a) be the target of the charge? Why or why not with page references....

thanks...

My take is no and was played as such due to pages 92 and pages 53

thanks.

Madcam.
There goes another crossing the Rubicon!
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
fatismo
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Posts: 103
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 1:20 am

Post by fatismo »

My understanding is that if a base is contributing dice to a combat to its front it can't be charged (except flank/rear). Therefore you can charge an overlap, or a base not giving dice eg third/fourth rank of a BG (pike or spear backed by LF bow spring to mind or a unit in column maybe).

This is considered a frontal charge therefore when you conform you slid in beside BG 1. Also if it's pike I'm pretty sure they still get all there factors for 4 ranks deep even though you are hitting the third or fourth rank.
marioslaz
Captain - Bf 110D
Captain - Bf 110D
Posts: 870
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:11 pm
Location: San Lazzaro (BO) Italy

Post by marioslaz »

See p. 57 last bullet. You can hit the flank of the rear base of BG 'a'. You fight an impact only 1 base vs 1 base, than BG '1' align as an overlap if there is room. BG 'a' never count as hit in flank, nor as fighting in 2 directions. If BG 'a' was in one rank only, you cannot do so and you can charge only if you can make a legal flank charge.
Mario Vitale
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3862
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Post by dave_r »

See p. 57 last bullet. You can hit the flank of the rear base of BG 'a'. You fight an impact only 1 base vs 1 base, than BG '1' align as an overlap if there is room. BG 'a' never count as hit in flank, nor as fighting in 2 directions. If BG 'a' was in one rank only, you cannot do so and you can charge only if you can make a legal flank charge.
That is incorrect. Since the second rank base adds dice to the combat it is "in melee", meaning that it cannot be charged. Madcam's initial page postings are correct - page 53 states "A charge cannot be declared if it would contact only the flank or rear edge of an enemy base which is already in melee to its front, except by a "legal" flank or rear charge."

Page 92 goes onto state "Rear ranks of an eligible troop type can fight if they belong to the same battle group as the front rank or overlap they are behind"

Therefore the front two rank's are in melee. Note third ranks are not (even if adding a tactical factor as pikes) since they are not behind a front rank base.
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

From the FAQ
FAQ wrote:Which enemy ranks cannot be so contacted if the front base in the file is already in melee to its front?
The first two ranks.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
petedalby
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3118
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Fareham, UK

Post by petedalby »

It is nailed as Phil says in the FAQ.
Pete
madcam2us
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:54 am
Location: Searching for the meaning of "Authors Intent"

Post by madcam2us »

Yes, indeed it is.

You'd think Mike Hart would have read it....

madcam.
There goes another crossing the Rubicon!
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
mhohio
Corporal - Strongpoint
Corporal - Strongpoint
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 1:00 am

Post by mhohio »

Hmmm.... U would definately think I would... but since we did not have the FAQ handy at the time....
'Happiness lies in conquering one's enemies, in driving them in front of oneself, in taking their property, in savouring their despair, in outraging their wives and daughters.'
Ghengis Khan
hazelbark
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4957
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Capital of the World !!

Post by hazelbark »

mhohio wrote:Hmmm.... U would definately think I would... but since we did not have the FAQ handy at the time....
Heck its surprising you guys even had the rules.
kal5056
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Posts: 426
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 11:35 pm

Post by kal5056 »

hazelbark wrote:
mhohio wrote:Hmmm.... U would definately think I would... but since we did not have the FAQ handy at the time....
Heck its surprising you guys even had the rules.

Or could agree to play by them.
Gino
SMAC
hazelbark
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4957
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Capital of the World !!

Post by hazelbark »

kal5056 wrote:
hazelbark wrote:
mhohio wrote:Hmmm.... U would definately think I would... but since we did not have the FAQ handy at the time....
Heck its surprising you guys even had the rules.

Or could agree to play by them.
Gino
SMAC
Well apparently they can't "agree"
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”