timurid ally question
Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design
-
BlackPrince
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF

- Posts: 269
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:34 pm
timurid ally question
I was checking out the Timurid list in Eternal Empire -thinking about options of morphing my Mongols. Then I noticed under allies it lists Uzbek allies- later tribal Mongol page 71. Well my questions is page 71 of what it is certainly not page 71 of Eternal Empire?
Keith
Keith
Ummm, screaming hordes of Elite, HF Heavily armored, Skilled swordsmen, drilled , bow, impact footcarlos wrote:Been asked before, answer is it will be in Lost Scrolls although as a fellow Timurid player I can't imagine what you expect to find in the Later Mongols that the Timurids don't already have.
John
I've noticed a lot of these sorts of things. For instance the Palmyrans can have allies that give Cataphracts and Light Horse... so pretty useless, but I think it's mostly to do with completeness. I'd always prefer to have in list generals than allies unless the alliance gives me something that I wouldn't normally have (Numidians in the Syracusan list for example) but you can imagine the cry if someone put out a list that didn't include some definite and obvious allies?carlos wrote:Been asked before, answer is it will be in Lost Scrolls although as a fellow Timurid player I can't imagine what you expect to find in the Later Mongols that the Timurids don't already have.
Ian
Viking (15mm)
Syracusan (15mm)
Palmyran (10mm - 15mm basing)
Horse Nomad (15mm)
Syracusan (15mm)
Palmyran (10mm - 15mm basing)
Horse Nomad (15mm)
Well, remember that FoG was written to support historical wargamers as well as tournament players, so including allies that act just like troop types within the lists allows the historical gamer to field armies that were representative of actual armies as opposed to min/maxing to create the most killer comp army at (X)xxx points.
Yeah, that's pretty much what I was saying.gozerius wrote:Well, remember that FoG was written to support historical wargamers as well as tournament players, so including allies that act just like troop types within the lists allows the historical gamer to field armies that were representative of actual armies as opposed to min/maxing to create the most killer comp army at (X)xxx points.
Ian
Viking (15mm)
Syracusan (15mm)
Palmyran (10mm - 15mm basing)
Horse Nomad (15mm)
Syracusan (15mm)
Palmyran (10mm - 15mm basing)
Horse Nomad (15mm)
-
LambertSimnel
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad

- Posts: 152
- Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 12:33 pm
- Location: Leamington, Warks, UK
but surely if 24 Cataphracts are good 30 must be terrific.DaiSho wrote:I've noticed a lot of these sorts of things. For instance the Palmyrans can have allies that give Cataphracts and Light Horse... so pretty useless,carlos wrote:Been asked before, answer is it will be in Lost Scrolls although as a fellow Timurid player I can't imagine what you expect to find in the Later Mongols that the Timurids don't already have.
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28411
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
Phil (Powell) certainly thinks so, and brings cataphract allies.LambertSimnel wrote:but surely if 24 Cataphracts are good 30 must be terrific.DaiSho wrote:I've noticed a lot of these sorts of things. For instance the Palmyrans can have allies that give Cataphracts and Light Horse... so pretty useless,carlos wrote:Been asked before, answer is it will be in Lost Scrolls although as a fellow Timurid player I can't imagine what you expect to find in the Later Mongols that the Timurids don't already have.
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28411
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm




