Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Ghaznavid, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators
The US were certainly not late for that particular party.iversonjm wrote:Somebody needs to clean up the mess and take the credit.dave_r wrote:Haven't you watched the Films Pete? I believe that USA single handedly beat the Germans and any other nation was co-incidental.petedalby wrote:I thought turning up late was standard for you guys?
Since you're team mate wrote his in a language other than the list checkers native language, I think you ought to be careful. As a result we have a new rule for this tournament. Any bg equipped with an "epee" are --- POA to anyone with a sword. The CT effects for Moyenne I think mean you flip a coin to see if you roll a 1 or 2.geed wrote:The R & R, the R & R, the R & R, the R & R, the R & R, the R & R, the R & R, the R & R....................
Geed
Kaplah! Dan, epee = batlefhazelbark wrote:Since you're team mate wrote his in a language other than the list checkers native language, I think you ought to be careful. As a result we have a new rule for this tournament. Any bg equipped with an "epee" are --- POA to anyone with a sword. The CT effects for Moyenne I think mean you flip a coin to see if you roll a 1 or 2.geed wrote:The R & R, the R & R, the R & R, the R & R, the R & R, the R & R, the R & R, the R & R....................
Geed
Any other special pleas mon ami ?
Look for the list tommorrow.
I think you mean Bat'leth. Incorrect apostrophe usage is getting worse...Kaplah! Dan, epee = batlef
Still Daves had is obscene dice moment and no one else could ever match that so no problem 
They could be better! Anyway, I've ran over the Irish before - so it should (in theory) be easier this timedavidandlynda wrote:Lots of serious buttock clenching for the Irish, all those knights
David
Perhaps the Song players have followed Terry Shaw's logic from Campaign: "bound to be lots of Mongols. So I'll bring lots of crossbows to shoot them down". No Mongols showed up. Still, they proved good enough against the Korean lancers.hazelbark wrote:I have to say I thought there were some interesting choices and interesting lists. The counter programming and counter-counter programing in some quarters is amusing.
Never have I had to check so many Indo-Greek and Song Lists.
Song sung blue?grahambriggs wrote:Perhaps the Song players have followed Terry Shaw's logic from Campaign: "bound to be lots of Mongols. So I'll bring lots of crossbows to shoot them down". No Mongols showed up.....hazelbark wrote:Never have I had to check so many Indo-Greek and Song Lists.
Your army is 270 BCgrahambriggs wrote:
Dates for the armies would be good.
What I mean is if you let players get away without specifying the dates for their armies (and in the case of my army, and Hannibal in Italy etc., who their commander is) they gain an advantage. So people might emulate them and say their list is Early Successor Macedon or Later Carthaginian without specifying dates or generals to get an advantage. Surely it's not a good idea for a list checker to encourage behaviour that makes checking lists more difficult or might advantage someone who submits a sloppy list?hazelbark wrote:Your army is 270 BCgrahambriggs wrote:
Dates for the armies would be good.
Period 3 has a date restriction of 1200-1299.
If I had to penalize sloppy lists we would have no players. Check out the update.grahambriggs wrote: Surely it's not a good idea for a list checker to encourage behaviour that makes checking lists more difficult or might advantage someone who submits a sloppy list?
