Romano British or Post Roman Brits
Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators
-
BlackPrince
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF

- Posts: 269
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:34 pm
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28322
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
As far as I know, yes.BlackPrince wrote:now that my copy of Wolves of the Sea is about a month from arriving in Oz I have two questions.
1. Is the release date of the 10th of Feb still on track?
18. The proportion of these that can be armoured varies at different dates.2. about how many armoured or protected cavalry bases will be in the list?
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28322
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
-
nikgaukroger
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 10287
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: LarryWorld
-
Redpossum
- Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41

- Posts: 1814
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:09 am
- Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Contact:
Yes, sir, understood. I was actually referring to the various names used by manufacturers of figures. I was looking at Warweb.com's Old Glory listings, and they use the phrase "Arthurian Britians' (sic)rbodleyscott wrote:Pretty much, except that the 3rd occupies only a small part of the period. (Assuming that he existed at all).possum wrote:So Romano-British, sub-Roman British, Arthurian British, Post-Roman British are 4 different terms for the same thing, correct?
Black Hat (who make all of three) say Sub-Roman
Splintered Light say "Romano-British/Sub-Roman British"
etc, etc, ad nauseam
-
BlackPrince
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF

- Posts: 269
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:34 pm
firstly, RBS thank for the information - it sounds the list maybe reasonably complex due to time peroids and covering the kingdoms and warlords plus you have the Arthur factor to deal with.
Possum, I am with you this use of multiple terms to cover the the Post Roman period in Britian. Who thought of the term sub-Roman it has to be the confussing term out? As to me sub means "below or under" not after. Personally every time I see the term sub Roman I first think of Pre-Roman and then I have to remember they mean Post Roman.
Keith
Possum, I am with you this use of multiple terms to cover the the Post Roman period in Britian. Who thought of the term sub-Roman it has to be the confussing term out? As to me sub means "below or under" not after. Personally every time I see the term sub Roman I first think of Pre-Roman and then I have to remember they mean Post Roman.
Keith
-
BlackPrince
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF

- Posts: 269
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:34 pm
John,
I do not know about using the Romans as British allies but you can use your Romano British as Armorican Allies for the Romans see page 76 Legions Triumphant.
At a Guess if you take all 18 cavalry and assume 55% armoured /45% protected and all superior that comes to 256pt and if you take an IC and 3 TC that is another 185pts. This leaves 359pt to spend given that your best infantry will cost about 6pts which means you are going to need 59 bases of HF. Of course there could some LF and LH for variety. From what the guys have said in the forum it sounds like you need a Hill Top Fort load lt spearmen to do a Romano British army.
Keith
I do not know about using the Romans as British allies but you can use your Romano British as Armorican Allies for the Romans see page 76 Legions Triumphant.
At a Guess if you take all 18 cavalry and assume 55% armoured /45% protected and all superior that comes to 256pt and if you take an IC and 3 TC that is another 185pts. This leaves 359pt to spend given that your best infantry will cost about 6pts which means you are going to need 59 bases of HF. Of course there could some LF and LH for variety. From what the guys have said in the forum it sounds like you need a Hill Top Fort load lt spearmen to do a Romano British army.
Keith
-
nikgaukroger
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 10287
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: LarryWorld
There are 4 allies available to the Post-Roman British.
However, as we are so close to publication I think I'll let you sweat on that info until you've got your books
However, as we are so close to publication I think I'll let you sweat on that info until you've got your books
Nik Gaukroger
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
-
BlackPrince
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF

- Posts: 269
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:34 pm
-
Redpossum
- Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41

- Posts: 1814
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:09 am
- Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Contact:
Hmm, four...nikgaukroger wrote:There are 4 allies available to the Post-Roman British.
However, as we are so close to publication I think I'll let you sweat on that info until you've got your books
Some kind of Saxons, maybe?
Picts?
Tuatha de Danaan?
Cu Chulain and the Red Branch?
It's going to be a month before I see my copy of WFTS
-
BlackPrince
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF

- Posts: 269
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:34 pm
I would guess
Saxon,
Pict
Scots Irish
The forth one is the toughie Romano British ally from a different kingdom /warlord or Vikings??? maybe as my history of period is not that good a continental ally that would be interesting! but very very very unlikely.
My real question is given most of the infantry is going to be HF protected, average, undrilled, lt spear, swordsman what size makes the best battle groups?
Keith
Saxon,
Pict
Scots Irish
The forth one is the toughie Romano British ally from a different kingdom /warlord or Vikings??? maybe as my history of period is not that good a continental ally that would be interesting! but very very very unlikely.
My real question is given most of the infantry is going to be HF protected, average, undrilled, lt spear, swordsman what size makes the best battle groups?
Keith
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28322
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
-
MCollett
- Corporal - Strongpoint

- Posts: 68
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:41 am
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Comparison with Another List suggests two flavours of Roman (depending on date), Saxons and, for those who have decamped to Little Britain, Alans.nikgaukroger wrote:There are 4 allies available to the Post-Roman British.
However, as we are so close to publication I think I'll let you sweat on that info until you've got your books
Best wishes,
Matthew
-
BlackPrince
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF

- Posts: 269
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:34 pm
-
nikgaukroger
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 10287
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: LarryWorld
-
BlackPrince
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF

- Posts: 269
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:34 pm
