AK UNITS - Errors and Oversights

Open beta forum.

Moderators: Slitherine Core, The Lordz, Panzer Corps Moderators, Panzer Corps Design

zappel
Master Sergeant - U-boat
Master Sergeant - U-boat
Posts: 535
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 6:44 pm

Re: AK UNITS - Errors and Oversights

Post by zappel »

Just a little typing error in the long name of the Panzerwerfer42:
Panzerwerfer 42
Panzerwerfer 42
Panzerwerfer42.png (33.46 KiB) Viewed 2232 times
It should be named "Panzerwerfer 42 auf Maultier" (instead of "Auf." - no capital, no point).
Kamerer
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 749
Joined: Wed May 02, 2012 6:27 am

Re: AK UNITS - Errors and Oversights

Post by Kamerer »

Sahariana -

With the reserve panel toggled, the image of the Sahariana is a bit off - it is a bit low within the framework on the big unit image. When it is framed in the reserve or deployment panel, the tires actually hang out of the frame a little bit and over the unit experience stars. It looks a little odd compared to other units.
Kamerer
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 749
Joined: Wed May 02, 2012 6:27 am

Re: AK UNITS - Errors and Oversights

Post by Kamerer »

Here's another "wish" for polishing -

Is it possible to make the aircraft's fuel distance alert - the white/red dot on the map - appear OVER a ground unit if it's red?

I ask as many times at the very edge of range, it is not possible to know whether it is red or white beneath the ground unit. Sometimes it's clear what it would be if the boundary is a straight line, but many times it is jagged and it's not possible to guess.
Erik2
Order of Battle Moderator
Order of Battle Moderator
Posts: 9574
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:59 pm
Location: Norway

Re: AK UNITS - Errors and Oversights

Post by Erik2 »

Kamerer wrote:Here's another "wish" for polishing -

Is it possible to make the aircraft's fuel distance alert - the white/red dot on the map - appear OVER a ground unit if it's red?

I ask as many times at the very edge of range, it is not possible to know whether it is red or white beneath the ground unit. Sometimes it's clear what it would be if the boundary is a straight line, but many times it is jagged and it's not possible to guess.
+1
Rudankort
FlashBack Games
FlashBack Games
Posts: 3836
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: AK UNITS - Errors and Oversights

Post by Rudankort »

We don't want red dots over units because we still want them recognizable. But what if we do like this:
http://www.rudankort.me/danger.jpg
?
VPaulus
Slitherine
Slitherine
Posts: 8324
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:33 pm
Location: Portugal

Re: AK UNITS - Errors and Oversights

Post by VPaulus »

Rudankort wrote:We don't want red dots over units because we still want them recognizable. But what if we do like this:
http://www.rudankort.me/danger.jpg
?
I never had any problem with the red dots, but I think this is a better solution for everybody.
Kamerer
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 749
Joined: Wed May 02, 2012 6:27 am

Re: AK UNITS - Errors and Oversights

Post by Kamerer »

Yes, that would solve the problem. The background shading would let you know, whether or not you can see the dot. Perfect!
Kamerer
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 749
Joined: Wed May 02, 2012 6:27 am

Re: AK UNITS - Errors and Oversights

Post by Kamerer »

Unit management suggestion: New equipment availability

Here's another "wish" thing I've had a while (before AK beta) - when new equipment becomes available during a scenario, could that be repeated with the other new equipment at the start of the next scenario - e.g., appear in the same information box with the other equipment?

I find that when fighting a scenario, I can be very focused and since I don't really have the ability to do upgrades while my units are in combat, I just disregard it. Then by the start of the next scenario I forget about that particular new unit or unit type. In GC, I always miss several upgrades because of that. Just a wish.
Razz1
Panzer Corps Moderator
Panzer Corps Moderator
Posts: 3308
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:49 am
Location: USA

Re: AK UNITS - Errors and Oversights

Post by Razz1 »

Italian 90/53 AA unit can switch to AT mode.

Range 3
Rudankort
FlashBack Games
FlashBack Games
Posts: 3836
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: AK UNITS - Errors and Oversights

Post by Rudankort »

Razz1 wrote:Italian 90/53 AA unit can switch to AT mode.

Range 3
Good catch. :)
ThvN
Panzer Corps Moderator
Panzer Corps Moderator
Posts: 1408
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 8:55 pm

Re: AK UNITS - Errors and Oversights

Post by ThvN »

Rudankort wrote:
Razz1 wrote:Italian 90/53 AA unit can switch to AT mode.

Range 3
Good catch. :)

Also, the AT version of AA gun 75/46 C.A. m34 has a range of two.
ThvN
Panzer Corps Moderator
Panzer Corps Moderator
Posts: 1408
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 8:55 pm

Re: AK UNITS - Errors and Oversights

Post by ThvN »

And before I forget, about the Italian tanks when viewed in the purchase screen, under the 3D unit picture, it says:

M13/40: Fiat-Ansaldo M13/40
M14/41: Fiat M41/41
M15/42: Fiat M41/41

The last one is clearly an error, and maybe the naming could be made consistent? The M13/40 is the only one with 'Ansaldo' in the name, all the other tanks are simply called Fiat.
uran21
Panzer Corps Map Designer
Panzer Corps Map Designer
Posts: 2318
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 8:34 pm

Re: AK UNITS - Errors and Oversights

Post by uran21 »

Can you confirm Ansaldo was involved in manufacturing process of other two?
Chris10
Captain - Bf 110D
Captain - Bf 110D
Posts: 890
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 1:06 am
Location: Spain

Re: AK UNITS - Errors and Oversights

Post by Chris10 »

uran21 wrote:Can you confirm Ansaldo was involved in manufacturing process of other two?
positive

Ansaldo-Fossati build the following number of tanks:
M13/40: 799
M14/41: 1103
M15/42: 140
at least...number not excatly known

pictures of Ansaldo-Fossati factory
Image
Image
uran21
Panzer Corps Map Designer
Panzer Corps Map Designer
Posts: 2318
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 8:34 pm

Re: AK UNITS - Errors and Oversights

Post by uran21 »

Thanks for confirmation. Anything to add for other Italian tanks? I see L3/35 on the picture.
Kamerer
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 749
Joined: Wed May 02, 2012 6:27 am

Re: AK UNITS - Errors and Oversights

Post by Kamerer »

Prestige and minefield clearance:

Replayed Alam Halfa. I noticed the rich prestige rewarded to units for minefield clearance. I took advantage of it, and I ran one Pio. unit from "9" up to ~230 (!), just running down his strength killing the mines. I put about 150 on two other units. After breaching, I just left them behind to earn experience. Also it looks like each minefield is considered a kill, so they should also rack up hero bonuses soon because of it.

Seems like a loophole - perhaps mine clearance should get 1/2 value for the kill/damage? Most people might not find the "loophole" but some will.
Rudankort
FlashBack Games
FlashBack Games
Posts: 3836
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:23 pm
Contact:

Re: AK UNITS - Errors and Oversights

Post by Rudankort »

Kamerer wrote:Seems like a loophole - perhaps mine clearance should get 1/2 value for the kill/damage? Most people might not find the "loophole" but some will.
Good point, I'll look into this.
Kamerer
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 749
Joined: Wed May 02, 2012 6:27 am

Re: AK UNITS - Errors and Oversights

Post by Kamerer »

Elite replacement cost varies with transport?

Hmm, now repairing those Pionieres I banged up, I find something I never noticed before - the elite replacements vary quite a bit by the attached transport.

2-strength Pio., with 250/1 transport - 159 pts to go from "2" to "10."
1-strength Pio, with Opel truck - 109 pts. to go from "1" to "10"
1- strength Pio, no transport, 86 pts.

Is this desirable? I assume it's in PC, too, I just never noticed. I know elite costs more for more advanced units, but I had never noticed it being more for the same unit based on transport mode.
ThvN
Panzer Corps Moderator
Panzer Corps Moderator
Posts: 1408
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 8:55 pm

Re: AK UNITS - Errors and Oversights

Post by ThvN »

uran21 wrote:Thanks for confirmation. Anything to add for other Italian tanks? I see L3/35 on the picture.
The rest look fine. Ansaldo was the state manufacturing firm of basically all Italian tanks, they had the monopoly.
ThvN
Panzer Corps Moderator
Panzer Corps Moderator
Posts: 1408
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 8:55 pm

Re: AK UNITS - Errors and Oversights

Post by ThvN »

Kamerer wrote:Elite replacement cost varies with transport?

Hmm, now repairing those Pionieres I banged up, I find something I never noticed before - the elite replacements vary quite a bit by the attached transport.

2-strength Pio., with 250/1 transport - 159 pts to go from "2" to "10."
1-strength Pio, with Opel truck - 109 pts. to go from "1" to "10"
1- strength Pio, no transport, 86 pts.

Is this desirable? I assume it's in PC, too, I just never noticed. I know elite costs more for more advanced units, but I had never noticed it being more for the same unit based on transport mode.
Well, the Opel truck costs 50, the 250/1 costs 200. These costs get added to the unit when you buy it. Watch the price go up when adding transports when buying new. So you are also paying to replace the lost transport vehicles, which can be quite expensive.
Buying cost:
Pioneer: 193 prestige
Pioneer + truck: 243 prestige
Pioneer + 250/1: 393 prestige
Post Reply

Return to “Panzer Corps Open Beta”