Akragas (DC) 406BC (FPSC game 2)

kme37158 · Post by **kme37158** » Fri Jul 08, 2011 6:34 am

kme37158 (Carthaginians) 8/12 archie(Syracusans) 17/15

kme37158 (Syracusans) 10/15 archie(Carthaginians) 14/12

I post a paired game with kme as the password

kme37158 · Post by **kme37158** » Fri Jul 08, 2011 6:43 am

kme37158 as the password as kme is to short.

Archie · Post by **Archie** » Fri Jul 08, 2011 6:59 am

kme37158

Posted: 08 Jul 2011 06:43 Post subject:

kme37158 as the password as kme is to short.

Its only one game per round, next round starts when most results are in.

Well played in our game.

kme37158 · Post by **kme37158** » Fri Jul 08, 2011 7:30 am

ok did not realise I cancel.

TheGrayMouser · Post by **TheGrayMouser** » Sat Jul 09, 2011 3:25 pm

TGM (Cartho) 5/15 jonno(Syr) 12/12

TGM(Syr) 14/12 jonno(Cartho) 7/15

Looks like we broke even

iandavidsmith · Post by **iandavidsmith** » Sun Jul 10, 2011 11:39 am

iandavidsmith (Carthage) 14/15 vs 12/12 Arminius (Syracuse)

iandavidsmith (Syracuse) 12/12 vs 15/15 Arminius (Carthage)

both very close games....
Ian

davouthojo · Post by **davouthojo** » Wed Jul 13, 2011 4:01 pm

davouthojo (Carthage) 0/15 vs 12/12 razorback77 (Syracuse)

davouthojo (Syracuse) 0/12 vs 15/15 razorback77 (Carthage)

I'll never be this lucky again..........and you also need the enemy general to be distracted by moving house too....

Archie · Post by **Archie** » Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:43 am

Akragas 490BC
Battlegroups..27......Total A.....Total B...Tournment
.................................15..............12.......Score .points

davouthojo................0...............0.............27 .........100%
pantherboy................0..............2..............25 ...........93%
Morbio.......................4..............7.............16 ............59%
batesmotel.................3............12.............12 ...........44%
Lysimachos................4............12.............11............41%
kme37158................10..............8.............9..............33%
Triarius....................12..............7..............8.............30%
jonno.........................7.............12............8..............30%
TheGrayMouser..........5............14...............8 ............30%
iandavidsmith..........14.............12.............1 ..............4%
petergarnett............13.............14..............0..............0%
Arminius..................15.............12..............0..............0%
razorback77.............15............12..............0...............0%
Ferb.........................15.............13.............-1 ............-4%
massina_nz..............15.............14........... -2 .............-7%
tofman04 ................16.............13............-2 .............-7%
Archie......................17.............14............ -4 ..........-15%
deeter......................14.............20........... -7 ...........-26%

Average score 10/15 & 11/12 (22%)

Well done everybody.....

batesmotel · Post by **batesmotel** » Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:49 am

batesmotel (Carthaginian) 3/15 - deeter (Syracusan) 20/12
batesmotel (Syracusan) 12/12 - deeter (Syracusan) 14/15

The last 3 turns of the second game saw both of us 2 from breaking without either one of us finishing it. On the last turn I finally charged a hoplite that was below 75% strength into a disrupted Carthagian chariot and the hoplite broke to end the game.

As a request for future rounds, would it be possible to try to avoid the really simple scenarios like Marathon and Akragas. While these really small scenarios without many units and without much significant terrain are good for learning the game, they really aren't all that much fun to play. A small scenario can be good if it involves interesting terrain like many of the starter army ones do, and a larger scenario with diverse opposing forces can be interesting even if there isn't much important terrain but both small and lacking important terrain really tends to be boring to play.

Chris

Archie · Post by **Archie** » Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:08 pm

As a request for future rounds, would it be possible to try to avoid the really simple scenarios like Marathon and Akragas. While these really small scenarios without many units and without much significant terrain are good for learning the game, they really aren't all that much fun to play. A small scenario can be good if it involves interesting terrain like many of the starter army ones do, and a larger scenario with diverse opposing forces can be interesting even if there isn't much important terrain but both small and lacking important terrain really tends to be boring to play.

Chris

Lets have a few suggestions on the next scenaro.... something a little meater would be nice.
We can always go back to any we miss....

Ferb · Post by **Ferb** » Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:14 pm

The next scenario in chronological order that is of decent size is Sparta 338 BC. I'd be happy to give that one a go.

batesmotel · Post by **batesmotel** » Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:23 pm

Crimissos River is a small scenario, but also one where the terrain plays an important part. Unlike the featureless plain of Akirgas, the terrain makes it a much more interesting scenario while still a smaller one.

Chris

Archie · Post by **Archie** » Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:47 pm

deeter (Syracusan) 20/12 .... is that correct ?

batesmotel · Post by **batesmotel** » Thu Jul 14, 2011 1:14 pm

Archie wrote:deeter (Syracusan) 20/12 .... is that correct ?

Yes, most of his remaining units broke on the last turn.

Chris

Archie · Post by **Archie** » Thu Jul 14, 2011 1:36 pm

Thats unlucky..... I been saved again... I believe!

Came up with a solution.... we can play High, Mod, low, to vary the games. They do seem to... at times come in batches.. 3 highs, a low then 3 more highs.

So if we all agreeable the next games will be as follows:

Gaugameta 331BC (91BGS) High, Crocus Plain 353BC (40BGS) Moderate, Crimissos River 341BC (30BGS) Low.