The Dustbin

[stockwellpete]

70% feels high to me. I am thinking that a 70% threshold is designed to minimize the loss of players. If it is desired to minimize player defection, 60% seems like a strong vote to at least add one more division to the 1600 point threshold, if not both. I'll sign up for my 4 divisions regardless.

I think we have a good balance already with 2 sections at 1200pts and 2 at 1600pts. So I don't think there is any need for a change unless there is very substantial support for one. That is why I set the bar at 70%. If those wanting a change fall just short of this target then I will change the Themed Event to 1600pts provided there is at least 66% support for larger 1600pt armies. But to shift me from 1200pts for Classical and Late Antiquity you will need to get 70% in the poll.

[bomber23]

Division D

bomber23 [Andulsians] beat baldrick52 [Indians] 57-22

[herm]

Division A

herm (seleucid) beat cunningcairn (thracian) 58-25

Thks to my opponent.

[Garokan]

Division D

Garokan – Arab, Bedouin 300-636 AD with Byzantine 579-599 AD allies defeated Barrold713 - Roman 425-492 AD with Frankish 260-495 AD allies 60 - 38

Thanks for the game

[bomber23]

Division D

bomber23 challenges:

Doyley50

edb1815

ggarynorman

Supervark

password 1234

[stockwellpete]

Early Middle Ages A-D Tables.jpg (867.93 KiB) Viewed 1342 times

Early Middle Ages E-F Tables.jpg (486.32 KiB) Viewed 1342 times

[stockwellpete]

Early Middle Ages A-B Charts.jpg (667.21 KiB) Viewed 1279 times

Early Middle Ages C-D Charts.jpg (655.22 KiB) Viewed 1279 times

Early Middle Ages E-F charts.jpg (669.05 KiB) Viewed 1279 times

[stockwellpete]

With 9 straight wins Swuul and his British army have swept all before him in Early Middle Ages Division D. Well played Swuul!

[stockwellpete]

With 8 matches completed kraff and his Sassanid army have built an unassailable lead in Early Middle Ages Division F. Well played kraff!

[stockwellpete]

There is still no contact from MakeshiftPlan. I will give him to the end of Sunday to make contact as he has completed one match, but I think it very likely that he is AWOL now. Stormcrow is standing by to take his place.

[hscic]

Division F
hscic - Palmyran 258-273 AD
challenges
gioe07 – Byzantine 493-550 AD
PW is.gioe
PM sent

[Swuul]

Thank you

[Ludendorf]

Congratulations Swuul. That's a fantastic achievement!

[Nosy_Rat]

Impressive result, congratulations!

[Doyley50]

Well done Swuul!

[General Shapur]

Division D

General Shapur Dailami 928-1055 AD with Armenian 885-1045 AD allies defeats Doyley50 Anglo-Danish 1017-1041 48:21

thanks for the game

[nyczar]

70% feels high to me. I am thinking that a 70% threshold is designed to minimize the loss of players. If it is desired to minimize player defection, 60% seems like a strong vote to at least add one more division to the 1600 point threshold, if not both. I'll sign up for my 4 divisions regardless.

I think we have a good balance already with 2 sections at 1200pts and 2 at 1600pts. So I don't think there is any need for a change unless there is very substantial support for one. That is why I set the bar at 70%. If those wanting a change fall just short of this target then I will change the Themed Event to 1600pts provided there is at least 66% support for larger 1600pt armies. But to shift me from 1200pts for Classical and Late Antiquity you will need to get 70% in the poll.

Got it, Thanks.

[SpeedyCM]

Division C

SpeedyCM - Dailami 928-1055 AD with Armenian 885-1045 AD allies defeats ulysisgrunt - Viking, Ireland 900-1049 AD with Scots 851-1051 AD allies 40-4.

[Swuul]

Grats kraff, well done!

[Ludendorf]

I'd kind of like a mix to be honest. I guess I'll abstain. A 2000 point tournament would be interesting as well; it drastically changes how some of the more one-dimensional lists play. The Galatians go from being a mediocre list to being positively lethal for example.