Bru's Scenarios and Campaigns
Moderators: Order of Battle Moderators, The Artistocrats
-
bru888
- Order of Battle Moderator

- Posts: 6214
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 5:39 pm
- Location: United States
Re: Bru's Scenarios
Battle of the Scheldt is released. Download link is in the opening post.
The good news is, the port of Antwerp is in the hands of the Allies. As they advance into Germany, Antwerp will go a long way toward relieving the bottlenecks at Cherbourg and ports in Brittany. The bad news is, Antwerp is currently useless as its port is closed.
Communication with the North Sea from Antwerp requires control of the estuary at the mouth of the River Scheldt, including Walcheren Island and Beveland on the north side of the West Scheldt, and the low-lying lands on the southern bank of the estuary. The Germans are well aware of this and have these areas heavily fortified.
Under the command of Lieutenant-General Guy Simonds, the First Canadian Army, with Canadian, Polish and British units attached, will open up the shipping route to Antwerp so that its port can be used to supply the Allies in northwest Europe. Knowing what is at stake, well-established Wehrmacht defenders will mount a spirited defense of the Scheldt estuary, including the crude but effective tactic of opening dykes and deliberately flooding land areas along the estuary.
Meanwhile, with the capture or destruction of the launch facilities used to attack England, V-1 flying bombs are now being employed in attacks against strategic points in Belgium, primarily the port of Antwerp.
It's not for the faint-hearted. It's big and complicated, with 60 turns and hundreds of units. I remain the purveyor of a niche product.
The good news is, the port of Antwerp is in the hands of the Allies. As they advance into Germany, Antwerp will go a long way toward relieving the bottlenecks at Cherbourg and ports in Brittany. The bad news is, Antwerp is currently useless as its port is closed.
Communication with the North Sea from Antwerp requires control of the estuary at the mouth of the River Scheldt, including Walcheren Island and Beveland on the north side of the West Scheldt, and the low-lying lands on the southern bank of the estuary. The Germans are well aware of this and have these areas heavily fortified.
Under the command of Lieutenant-General Guy Simonds, the First Canadian Army, with Canadian, Polish and British units attached, will open up the shipping route to Antwerp so that its port can be used to supply the Allies in northwest Europe. Knowing what is at stake, well-established Wehrmacht defenders will mount a spirited defense of the Scheldt estuary, including the crude but effective tactic of opening dykes and deliberately flooding land areas along the estuary.
Meanwhile, with the capture or destruction of the launch facilities used to attack England, V-1 flying bombs are now being employed in attacks against strategic points in Belgium, primarily the port of Antwerp.
It's not for the faint-hearted. It's big and complicated, with 60 turns and hundreds of units. I remain the purveyor of a niche product.
- Bru
Re: Bru's Scenarios
I found some time; so I discovered this scenario with much pleasure, really. An awesome scenario, thanks!
I would have some suggestions and various things to tell about it, if I may:
*******
Now, there is no garrison immediately in the town of Woensdrecht… okay, that’s fine.
The German seem to lack some AT capability, on overall…
So, what about
1. One 2 hexes W of Woensdrecht (thus covering 4 units at a time and strengthening an important point – we’ll come back to this later)
And, in the NE of the map, perhaps two “lighter” models of AT guns:
2. One just 1 hex N of Steenbergen (to cover the unit there)
3. One just 1 hex NW of Fijnaart (to cover the garrison and the MG-foxhole)
*******
I looked it up - there was a lot of discussion about whether or not to use paratroopers
BUT I’ve found tracks of the presence of paratroopers on this battlefield – but German paratroopers and on the ground from start…
First from the French Wiki, with something that may be translated like this:
“Hard fighting at Woensdrecht allowed the first phase objective to be reached on 6 October. The Germans of the 67th Army Corps, including the Chill Battle Group, which brought together the remnants of the 85th German Infantry Division reinforced by the 6th Parachute Regiment, saw the priority importance of holding this position as it allowed them to control access to South Beveland and the island of Walcheren.”
The 6th Parachute Regiment… aha!
And, a little extract from its English “equivalent” Wiki ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Scheldt ):
"Field Marshal Walter Model, who was commanding Army Group B, ordered: "The corridor to Walcheren will be kept open at any price; if necessary, it will be regained by forces ruthlessly detached from other sectors". Model, a tough and ruthless National Socialist fanatic known for his devotion to Hitler, was called "the Führer's Fireman" because Hitler always gave him the toughest jobs. Model sent the 256th Volksgrenadier division and assault gun companies to allow the release of Battle Group Chill, the "fire brigade" consisting of 6th Parachute Regiment and assault gun companies. On 10 October, the Royal Regiment of Canada launched a surprise attack against the German lines at Woensdrecht, but for the next days was engaged in heavy fighting against counterattacks from Battle Group Chill. Major-General Charles Foulkes of the 2nd Division sent the Black Watch to support the Royal Regiment.[26] The German forces at Woensdrecht greatly outnumbered the Canadians and had Model known of this, he might have launched a counter-offensive. Instead he used attrition tactics by making piecemeal counterattacks."
=> And that’s (very) nice, because there is the possibility to
Which units?
I’m thinking at 2 or 3 units of Volkssturm, perhaps 2 units of Fallschirmjäger and perhaps 1 or 2 units of armored artillery (like 1 Wurfrahmen rocket-launcher and/or 1 Wespe or Hummel)! Perhaps these German units being labelled “Battle Group Chill” or something.
Where to deploy them?
Well, between Woensdrecht and Bergen Op Zoom (N of it) there isn’t much room available along the road. Although, there is of course the possibility to deploy some of them in the nearby farmlands.
Right now, we’ve much more room between Woensdrecht and Putte (S of it).
So, I would say there are two options:
A) Either deployed N of Woensdrecht (and partly in farmlands too) ready to move South very aggressively as soon as we’ve reached the town (perhaps 1 hex away from it or something);
B) Or deployed at Woensdrecht directly and in its southern surroundings (perhaps as well partly in nearby farmlands), ready to move South very aggressively as soon as the German have lost the town of Putte.
*******
Oh, by the way, no German engineer at all!?
However, I think all these different little adds are likely increase the immersion... and remove the feeling, that may happen, of a somewhat "linear" progression from the North of Antwerp, from an “island of resistance” to another. => Some good counter-attack!
*******
The disconnected “roads” in the SW area may look a little surprising, but I think it’s on purpose… to slow us a little down; at least we’ve bridges! And, anyway, it’s in the middle of farmland areas, so there may very well be no “real” road there, so, fine.
*******
Two very little details:
-> Tactical Status 7/8: “fortifications”
-> Minesweeping 1/3: well, text to slightly adapt, as the cargo ships are (fortunately) present from start
*******
‘seems that we’ve too much LCPs from start: I would say 20 extra LCPs for Canadians and 1 extra LCP for Polish, right?
(Once we've deployed all our troops... I don't think we're supposed to purchase more units and, anyway, would we have the RPs for that?)
*******
Prevent the skies from becoming empty… perhaps around turn 30, or as soon as the German have lost their last plane,
“The show must go on!”
*******
We may expect some (short) rainy periods...
*******
Last but not least, I would suggest an adaptation of this objective: “Capture all the castles in Zeeland”
I really like it, but there is a little something… Let’s start from the beginning, shall we?
With the naval and aeriel powers at disposal, together with the need to progress carefully against the enemy coastal defences… that may at some points offer the option to target some castles – perhaps as targets of opportunity, but anyway.
We can destroy these concrete bunkers by "just" using our naval and aerial means, and “Westhove Castle” is the more likely to be targeted for an obvious reason.
Well, we may imagine that some paratroopers (that we’ve not seen) or some partisans (that we’ve not seen either) have rushed inside these walls (if not ruins
Then, well, it still counts as a castle that has been captured even if there is no longer any castle/bunker on the map…
Solution?
Well, it could be possible to check whether there is an allied land unit in the vicinity of these castles once they are delt with in order to switch flag at this time… but that may be rather annoying (at least) to implement. And anyway better have, or keep, the same treatment for all of them.
(Of course, with a smart adaptation of all corresponding texts.
Et voilà !
-
bru888
- Order of Battle Moderator

- Posts: 6214
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 5:39 pm
- Location: United States
Re: Bru's Scenarios
Wow, Colonel. Before I get into this feedback, did you really enjoy playing this scenario?
- Bru
Re: Bru's Scenarios
Absolutely, a lot. 
-
stevefprice
- Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie

- Posts: 322
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2020 6:22 pm
Re: Bru's Scenarios
I'll save you the pain of that much feedback
I loved it!
Oddly I have a book on 41(RM) Commando who assaulted Walcheren in LVTs and I always thought it would be a good scenario to do one day. Glad someone did the hard work for me
-
bru888
- Order of Battle Moderator

- Posts: 6214
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 5:39 pm
- Location: United States
Re: Bru's Scenarios
Incredible! There are actually two people who enjoy my stuff. It's enough to inspire me again. Thanks.
- Bru
Re: Bru's Scenarios
This number may increase to 3 as I have just started playing 
-
bru888
- Order of Battle Moderator

- Posts: 6214
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 5:39 pm
- Location: United States
Re: Bru's Scenarios
In case anybody is wondering "Whatever happened to that old bugger, Bru?", I have been sidetracked by ... Genealogy!
I honestly thought that I could get it done before the 14-day trial subscription to Ancestry.com expired. What a fool I was! And they know what they are doing. Dilettantes will give up quickly but anybody who gets into it will be hooked for weeks and months, even if they keep at it day after day.
Those are the people that they make money on. I am one of them; it's fascinating stuff and one thing leads to another and another and another ...
Something to keep in mind is to limit the scope of your investigations so that you are not constantly branching out into obscure ancestries. That's what I am trying to do, focus on the main family lines, so that I am not distracted into time-consuming and immaterial research.
I have reached the upper regions of my family tree where records are sparse and barriers are met, such as when the first folks reached the shores of our land. It's like a wall comes down at that point; some "foreign" records are available but it's hard to tie them in with assurance without professional help. For one thing, there is a language translation issue and, mein Gott, would they stop with the flowery handwriting already!
Heh, no heroes in my family yet, but there have been a couple of scoundrels. And people lie! About their ages and origins. I have caught them at it.
I will return to work here someday soon. So please feel free to leave any comments and suggestions about my latest creation and I will follow up on them at a later date. Thanks.
I honestly thought that I could get it done before the 14-day trial subscription to Ancestry.com expired. What a fool I was! And they know what they are doing. Dilettantes will give up quickly but anybody who gets into it will be hooked for weeks and months, even if they keep at it day after day.
Those are the people that they make money on. I am one of them; it's fascinating stuff and one thing leads to another and another and another ...
Something to keep in mind is to limit the scope of your investigations so that you are not constantly branching out into obscure ancestries. That's what I am trying to do, focus on the main family lines, so that I am not distracted into time-consuming and immaterial research.
I have reached the upper regions of my family tree where records are sparse and barriers are met, such as when the first folks reached the shores of our land. It's like a wall comes down at that point; some "foreign" records are available but it's hard to tie them in with assurance without professional help. For one thing, there is a language translation issue and, mein Gott, would they stop with the flowery handwriting already!
Heh, no heroes in my family yet, but there have been a couple of scoundrels. And people lie! About their ages and origins. I have caught them at it.
I will return to work here someday soon. So please feel free to leave any comments and suggestions about my latest creation and I will follow up on them at a later date. Thanks.
- Bru
-
bru888
- Order of Battle Moderator

- Posts: 6214
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 5:39 pm
- Location: United States
Re: Bru's Scenarios
Actually, that is not true at all. My father flew bomber patrol planes in the Aleutian Islands during World War II. His father was wounded in the battle of San Juan Hill in the Spanish-American War. And his father was wounded at the Siege of Petersburg in the American Civil War. Three documented heroes right there, and I'm not done yet. Still looking for a WWI and Revolutionary War veteran.
EDIT: Well, there has been a WWI veteran but he really wasn't a family member, strictly speaking. More like one of those "honorary uncles," if you take my meaning.
- Bru
-
bru888
- Order of Battle Moderator

- Posts: 6214
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 5:39 pm
- Location: United States
Re: Bru's Scenarios
I will leave you with one more interesting thought (interesting to me, at least).
At three points so far in my family's history, if a bullet had been shot straighter, I wouldn't be here talking to you. Or if you believe in fate and karma, perhaps I would, but I would be "Bartholomew" instead of Bruce, say.
The two wounded gentlemen, I have mentioned already. The third person was my grandmother who was involved in a scandal at a tender age. She was shot in the jaw and neck by a deranged and jilted boyfriend who had spent his last dime on entertaining her. The story was in the local newspapers.
So, bang, bang, bang. Had any of those shots been fatal wounds, there would be NO Bru's Scenarios! Or maybe it would be "Bart's Scenarios."
At three points so far in my family's history, if a bullet had been shot straighter, I wouldn't be here talking to you. Or if you believe in fate and karma, perhaps I would, but I would be "Bartholomew" instead of Bruce, say.
The two wounded gentlemen, I have mentioned already. The third person was my grandmother who was involved in a scandal at a tender age. She was shot in the jaw and neck by a deranged and jilted boyfriend who had spent his last dime on entertaining her. The story was in the local newspapers.
So, bang, bang, bang. Had any of those shots been fatal wounds, there would be NO Bru's Scenarios! Or maybe it would be "Bart's Scenarios."
- Bru
-
bru888
- Order of Battle Moderator

- Posts: 6214
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 5:39 pm
- Location: United States
Re: Bru's Scenarios
I'm thinking about contacting Netflix to see if they are interested. They'll probably tell me, "Meh, that's been done already, many times over."
- Bru
Re: Bru's Scenarios
But how many have a descendant who could digitally model the combat scenarios the engaged in?!
-
bru888
- Order of Battle Moderator

- Posts: 6214
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 5:39 pm
- Location: United States
Re: Bru's Scenarios
Shards, I officially anoint you as the caped crusader who will get The Artistocrats off their schneid and expand their product into those other eras with so much potential. Are you up to the task, Caped Crusader?
- Bru
-
stevefprice
- Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie

- Posts: 322
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2020 6:22 pm
-
bru888
- Order of Battle Moderator

- Posts: 6214
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 5:39 pm
- Location: United States
Re: Bru's Scenarios
No, if anything, those are "funny uncles." I looked that term up before switching to "honorary uncles" which is more dignified. This fellow was a gentleman, well-liked, and always treated my brother and me with warmth and humor. It was not until we were adults that we discovered he was never actually married to my great-aunt and therefore not an official uncle ...
- Bru
-
terminator
- Field Marshal - Gustav

- Posts: 6117
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 12:48 pm
- Location: the land of freedom
Re: Bru's Scenarios
It's Tea Time with Bru... 
-
bru888
- Order of Battle Moderator

- Posts: 6214
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 5:39 pm
- Location: United States
Re: Bru's Scenarios
I told you there were scoundrels in my family tree. This fellow did not distinguish himself in the Civil War at all. Deserted in 1863; gave himself up right after the war ended at Appomattox. Genealogy is not all a bed of roses!
- Bru
-
bru888
- Order of Battle Moderator

- Posts: 6214
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 5:39 pm
- Location: United States
Re: Bru's Scenarios
Then, of course, the thought occurred to me: Was he shot?
Fortunately for his descendants, answer is no; he lived almost another 40 years. The other answer comes from this source:
While it is impossible to know with certainty how many soldiers deserted over the course of the conflict, Northern generals reckoned during the war that at least one soldier in five was absent from his regiment; at war’s end, the Union Provost Marshal General estimated that nearly a quarter of a million men had been absent from their units sometime during the war. Estimates for Confederate armies range even higher—perhaps as many as one soldier in three deserted during the course of the war ... Officially, desertion constituted a capital offense and was punishable by death. But because of the numbers of soldiers involved, it proved practically as well as politically impossible to execute every deserter who was captured. The armies could not afford the numerical loss of such large numbers of troops; more importantly, as Abraham Lincoln himself noted, people would not stand to see Americans shot by the dozens and twenties.
In short, the war was over and there had been enough killing. I wonder, though, whether this fellow knew this for sure when he gave himself up.
EDIT:
Oh, he knew alright.
President Lincoln had issued a proclamation on 11 March 1865 which said in part "... all deserters who shall, within sixty days from the date of this proclamation, viz, on or before the 10th day of May, 1865, return to service or report themselves to a provost-marshal shall be pardoned, on condition that they return to their regiments and companies or to such other organizations as they may be assigned ..."
In genealogy, one thing leads to another, and another, and another ...
- Bru

