The Dustbin
Moderator: Field of Glory 2 Tournaments Managers
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division E
Lynx57 (Roman 197-284 AD) beats Darkwater247 - Germanic/Gothic Horse Tribes 260-492 AD with Dacian (Carpi) 107-380 AD allies 50-24
Lynx57 (Roman 197-284 AD) beats Darkwater247 - Germanic/Gothic Horse Tribes 260-492 AD with Dacian (Carpi) 107-380 AD allies 50-24

“Tout le secret des armes ne consiste qu'en deux choses, à donner et à ne point recevoir.”
Molière Le misanthrope
Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
Division D
Kroche (Chinese (Han) 206-100BC) drew with Badger73 (Xiongnu 200 BC -155 AD) 49-34
Han forces marched tirelessly to entrap the Xiongnu forces, unfortunately the Xiongnu forces were well commanded and easily avoided the danger. GG
(2-2)
Kroche (Chinese (Han) 206-100BC) drew with Badger73 (Xiongnu 200 BC -155 AD) 49-34
Han forces marched tirelessly to entrap the Xiongnu forces, unfortunately the Xiongnu forces were well commanded and easily avoided the danger. GG
(2-2)
Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Division A
dim30 - Hephthalite 350-570 AD with Sassanid 350-476 AD allies (1600)
challenges
nyczar - Pictish 210-476 AD with Scots-Irish 50 BC-476 AD allies (1600)
pw : dim30
pm sent
dim30 - Hephthalite 350-570 AD with Sassanid 350-476 AD allies (1600)
challenges
nyczar - Pictish 210-476 AD with Scots-Irish 50 BC-476 AD allies (1600)
pw : dim30
pm sent
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division E
deeter (Gallic) defeats Bluefin (Syracuse) 48-3.
The enemy (consisting of many hoplites, skirmishers and cavalry) deployed along a ridge flanked by woods. Several hoplite units were deployed on a track in the woods protecting one flank. These were attacked by loose order Gauls which drew the rest of the army down in support. Their attack failed dismally with many hoplites going disordered or fragged at impact. The line collapsed quickly after that.
Deeter
deeter (Gallic) defeats Bluefin (Syracuse) 48-3.
The enemy (consisting of many hoplites, skirmishers and cavalry) deployed along a ridge flanked by woods. Several hoplite units were deployed on a track in the woods protecting one flank. These were attacked by loose order Gauls which drew the rest of the army down in support. Their attack failed dismally with many hoplites going disordered or fragged at impact. The line collapsed quickly after that.
Deeter
-
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2018 10:35 pm
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division C
BobGanoush(Bithynian) defeats ray552(Graeco-Bactrian) 61-39
BobGanoush(Bithynian) defeats ray552(Graeco-Bactrian) 61-39
-
- 2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 1:28 pm
- Location: Delaware, USA
Re: High Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Division C
edb1815 (Aragonese w/ Castillian/Leonese ally) challenges:
Marvin_The_Arvn - Castilian/Leonese 1200-1319 AD Psw Spain PM sent
rpadilla1988 - German (Imperial) 1200-1319 AD with German (South-East) 1200-1319 AD allies Psw: rpadilla PM sent
edb1815 (Aragonese w/ Castillian/Leonese ally) challenges:
Marvin_The_Arvn - Castilian/Leonese 1200-1319 AD Psw Spain PM sent
rpadilla1988 - German (Imperial) 1200-1319 AD with German (South-East) 1200-1319 AD allies Psw: rpadilla PM sent
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
snooky51 (Sassanid) defeats Morat (Sarmatian) -- 67-49
Back and forth match, Sarmatians scored early victories, pinning and flanking many Sassanid horsemen but once the Sarmatian right flank collapsed, the Sassanid's were able to sweep and hit the flanks of the Sarmatian warband to secure the victory.
snooky51 (Sassanid) defeats Morat (Sarmatian) -- 67-49
Back and forth match, Sarmatians scored early victories, pinning and flanking many Sassanid horsemen but once the Sarmatian right flank collapsed, the Sassanid's were able to sweep and hit the flanks of the Sarmatian warband to secure the victory.
-
- Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 4:42 am
- Location: Australia
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division A
SpeedyCM - Jewish Revolt 66-135 AD draws with dim30 - Hephthalite 350-570 AD with Sassanid 350-476 AD allies 53-49
(2-2)
SpeedyCM - Jewish Revolt 66-135 AD draws with dim30 - Hephthalite 350-570 AD with Sassanid 350-476 AD allies 53-49
(2-2)
-
- Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:33 pm
Re: Themed Event: winners post your results here . . .
Pool A
LuciusSulla (Ostrogothic) defeats Triarii (Byzantine), 63-42
Close battle as the score shows. Used some nasty ZOC locking tricks to trap the Byzantine cavalry with mass archers/mobs, so had to say what the result will be if we are using the new beta.
LuciusSulla (Ostrogothic) defeats Triarii (Byzantine), 63-42
Close battle as the score shows. Used some nasty ZOC locking tricks to trap the Byzantine cavalry with mass archers/mobs, so had to say what the result will be if we are using the new beta.
Re: High Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division A
CheAhn (Crusader) defeats Triarii (Germans) 41-7
CheAhn (Crusader) defeats Triarii (Germans) 41-7
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division C
kraff (Visigoth 419-621 AD) beat ulysisgrunt (Jewish Revolt 66-135 AD): 40-9.
kraff (Visigoth 419-621 AD) beat ulysisgrunt (Jewish Revolt 66-135 AD): 40-9.
-
- General - King Tiger
- Posts: 3776
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 6:43 pm
- Location: Wales
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division A
ericdoman1 - Palmyran 258-273 AD defeated Triarii - Visigoth 419-621 AD with Byzantine 551-578 AD allies 61-55
A very fortunate win for me. At one stage it was looking like a terrible beating for the Visigoths but a few rallies from disrupted to steady, stopped the cataphracts advance, flanks were turned and then Mike's cavalry started to take my right flank apart. Mike was in the lead for a short time but I managed to hold on for a win. Having 1 rally from rout more than Mike made the difference as he would have beaten me on the next turn. I think a draw would have been the right result. Well played Mike and now some HMAing.
(3-1)
ericdoman1 - Palmyran 258-273 AD defeated Triarii - Visigoth 419-621 AD with Byzantine 551-578 AD allies 61-55
A very fortunate win for me. At one stage it was looking like a terrible beating for the Visigoths but a few rallies from disrupted to steady, stopped the cataphracts advance, flanks were turned and then Mike's cavalry started to take my right flank apart. Mike was in the lead for a short time but I managed to hold on for a win. Having 1 rally from rout more than Mike made the difference as he would have beaten me on the next turn. I think a draw would have been the right result. Well played Mike and now some HMAing.
(3-1)
-
- Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:33 pm
Re: Themed Event: winners post your results here . . .
Pool A
LuciusSulla (Byzantine) defeats Triarii (Ostrogothic), 61-41
Another close game. Both sides crushed each other's back row and then turned back to for a second encounter.
LuciusSulla wins 2-0 and goes through to the final.
LuciusSulla (Byzantine) defeats Triarii (Ostrogothic), 61-41
Another close game. Both sides crushed each other's back row and then turned back to for a second encounter.
LuciusSulla wins 2-0 and goes through to the final.
-
- General - King Tiger
- Posts: 3776
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 6:43 pm
- Location: Wales
Re: High Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Division A
ericdoman1 - Mongol (Ilkhanid) 1230-1353 AD with Armenian (Cilicia) 1155-1375 AD allies (1200)
challenges
Triarii - German (North West) 1200-1319 AD with German (Imperial) 1200-1319 AD allies (1600)
pw = triarii, pm also sent
ericdoman1 - Mongol (Ilkhanid) 1230-1353 AD with Armenian (Cilicia) 1155-1375 AD allies (1200)
challenges
Triarii - German (North West) 1200-1319 AD with German (Imperial) 1200-1319 AD allies (1600)
pw = triarii, pm also sent
Re: High Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Div A
tyronec vs CheAhn & ianiow
pw: Sancho
tyronec vs CheAhn & ianiow
pw: Sancho
Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Div A
tyronec vs Triarii
pw: Ziyar
tyronec vs Triarii
pw: Ziyar
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division D
Garokan - Spanish 900-1049 AD with Andalusian 756-1049 AD allies defeats FireknightBarcelona - Byzantine 740-903 AD 46-6
Thanks for the game.
Garokan - Spanish 900-1049 AD with Andalusian 756-1049 AD allies defeats FireknightBarcelona - Byzantine 740-903 AD 46-6
Thanks for the game.
Re: High Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
kraff (Ghurid 1100-1215 AD with Indian (Hindu North) 1050-1300 AD allies) drew with TaBai (Mongol (Ilkhanid) 1230-1353 AD with Armenian (Cilicia) 1155-1375 AD allies): 56-36.
(2-2)
kraff (Ghurid 1100-1215 AD with Indian (Hindu North) 1050-1300 AD allies) drew with TaBai (Mongol (Ilkhanid) 1230-1353 AD with Armenian (Cilicia) 1155-1375 AD allies): 56-36.
(2-2)
Re: High Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Division B
kraff (Ghurid 1100-1215 AD with Indian (Hindu North) 1050-1300 AD allies) challenges paulmcneil (Armenian (Cilician) 1100-1154 AD with Seljuq Turkish (West) 1037-1154 AD allies).
Password is "paulmcneil".
PM sent.
kraff (Ghurid 1100-1215 AD with Indian (Hindu North) 1050-1300 AD allies) challenges paulmcneil (Armenian (Cilician) 1100-1154 AD with Seljuq Turkish (West) 1037-1154 AD allies).
Password is "paulmcneil".
PM sent.
Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Division B
kraff (Arab (Conquest) 638-684 AD) challenges lunecastle (Anglo-Saxon 600-870 AD with Welsh 600-1049 AD allies).
Password is "lunecastle".
PM sent.
kraff (Arab (Conquest) 638-684 AD) challenges lunecastle (Anglo-Saxon 600-870 AD with Welsh 600-1049 AD allies).
Password is "lunecastle".
PM sent.