The Dustbin

Moderator: Field of Glory 2 Tournaments Managers

Badger73
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Posts: 337
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2018 11:08 pm
Location: Wisconsin, USA

Re: Any questions?

Post by Badger73 »

Hmm, my understanding was that either player could reject a map within three turns but only twice for a match. The third map had to be played regardless.
phlewis
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 267
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 7:25 pm

Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by phlewis »

Division E

phlewis Sarmatian 25-375 AD with Germanic Horse Tribes 260-492 AD allies (1600)
Challenges
GeneralKostas Armenian 253-476 AD with Roman 313-378 AD allies (1600)

Password: armenia
GDod
Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
Posts: 1813
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 4:26 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: High Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .

Post by GDod »

Division C

GDod Andalusian 1050-1154 (with Berber (Murabit) Allies 1039-1086) beat Kroche German (South East) 1200-1319AD 44-2

An unfortunate swamp in the middle mean't the Andalusians had the opportunity to withdraw the entire wing and "swamp" the enemies left flank.


GDod Andalusian 1050-1154 (with Berber (Murabit) Allies 1039-1086) beat random27 Indian (Hindu North) 1050-1300 AD (with Indian (Rajput)) 1050-1339 AD 43-17

Retiring to a forest wasn't enough to stop the advance on the Andalusian right while the centre and left was tied down and beaten back. Contagious Indian morale drops didn't help.

Thanks to both players for the challenge.
"La guerre ne détermine pas qui a raison, mais qui reste" - Bertrand Russell
joggy
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz  251/1
Posts: 133
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 3:57 am

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by joggy »

Division B

joggy (Germanic/Gothic Horse Tribes 260-492 AD with Dacian (Carpi) 107-380 AD allies) beat IMC (Jewish Revolt 66-135 AD) 65-42
olddog52
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz  251/1
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 3:17 pm

Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .

Post by olddog52 »

Division E

olddog52 -Chinese (Jin) victory over gort7078-Chinese 3 Kingdoms (Wu) 52-18

I owe this victory to my cavalry with support from my archers, Wu Inf pushed my right flank back but Jin cavalry moved like a bolt from heaven breaking the Wu right.

olddog52-Chinese 3 Kingdoms (Wu) victory over gort7078- Chinese (Jin) 63-40

Terrain and arrows won this battle. Thank you Don for 2 well-played games.
devoncop
Sr. Colonel - Battleship
Sr. Colonel - Battleship
Posts: 1641
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:46 am

Re: Any questions?

Post by devoncop »

Right well I shall bear that in mind for next season then 🙄
Vadim84
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Posts: 155
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 9:56 am

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by Vadim84 »

Division F

Vadim 84(Germanic/Gothic Horse Tribes 260-492 AD with Dacian (Carpi) 107-380 AD allies) beat mh5064 (Roman) 51-25
thanks for the game
stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 14501
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Any questions?

Post by stockwellpete »

mh5064 wrote: Sat Oct 23, 2021 8:08 pm Hi,

player Lunarfoxx in Classical Antiquity, Division F invoking rule 4 has arbitrarily canceled the battle because it is unfavorable to him.("Rule 4 Match Players may agree to re-start a match within the first three turns if they believe the terrain is likely to produce a sterile match or a draw. The maximum number of re-starts permitted for a single match is two.")
Without having agreed on the thing and without having responded positively. I quote his exact words "I don't known about this terrain. I might wanna redo this" and then "I'll set up the new match. gonna redo it within the 3 turns cuz of terrain".
But the ground was fine for me and certainly would not have produced a drawn or sterile game.
He also benefits from having seen the composition of my army.
I wanted to ask a question about this:
Is this kind of attitude regular?
Thanks

Cheers
I hope it is not, because it is against the rule. Rule 4 is quite clear . . .

"Players may agree to re-start a match within the first three turns if they believe the terrain is likely to produce a sterile match or a draw. The maximum number of re-starts permitted for a single match is two."

The key word here is "agree". What I can do is pass the match to our adjudication panel, if you so wish. Please let me know.
stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 14501
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Any questions?

Post by stockwellpete »

Badger73 wrote: Sat Oct 23, 2021 9:14 pm Hmm, my understanding was that either player could reject a map within three turns but only twice for a match. The third map had to be played regardless.
No, that is wrong. There has to be agreement between the two players.
stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 14501
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by stockwellpete »

obsolete
tyronec
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1922
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 11:09 am

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by tyronec »

Division A

tyronec (Carthaginian) defeats Stew101 (Persian) 61-50

Thanks for the game.

(3-1)
devoncop
Sr. Colonel - Battleship
Sr. Colonel - Battleship
Posts: 1641
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:46 am

Re: Any questions?

Post by devoncop »

In an unheard of development I actually understood the rules correctly then 👍
stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 14501
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by stockwellpete »

CA tables a-d.png
CA tables a-d.png (101.73 KiB) Viewed 1100 times
CA tables e-f.png
CA tables e-f.png (57.07 KiB) Viewed 1100 times
stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 14501
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by stockwellpete »

Weekly round-up
Still very slow in Division A where tyronec (Syracusan) is taking full advantage by posting his fourth straight win this week to establish a clear lead of 10 points. Things have tightened at the top of Division B where dim30 (Syracusan) has closed the gap to 3 points on leader desertedfox (Kyrenean Greek). Both players have 3 matches left. batesmotel (Roman) has started with 2 narrow victories and may present a challenge. Division C is also quiet where ray552 (Graeco-Bactrian) is still the leader. Both DanZanzibar (Samnite) and BobGanoush (Bithynian) look well-placed to challenge him in the next few weeks. A good week for Bodhran (Bosporan) has seen him extend his lead to 7 points over second-placed ulysisgrunt (Gallic) with unbeaten Kroche (Carthaginian) and DocVanNostrand (Thracian) currently sitting back in the pack with 2 wins each. Rob123 (Achaemenid) is in deep relegation trouble after losing his first 5 matches. markleslie (Antigonid) has extended his lead in Division E to 9 points after posting his sixth win from 7 starts, but there are still 4 players who could challenge him for the top spot. Holien (Hannibal in Africa) and sivispacem (Sertorius) are best-placed currently and both players still have 100% records. Hari72 (Macedonian) is facing the drop after registering only 1 win in his first 7 matches. Rosedelio (Kyrenean Greek) duly won his eighth consecutive match to secure promotion from Division F this week, while mh5064 (Macedonian) is now challenging for second place after narrowly beating the present incumbent olddog52 (Spartan).

Unbeaten runs of 3 matches or more
tyronec (Division A) 4 matches
ray552 (Division C) 3 matches
Badger73 (Division E) 3 matches
Holien (Division E) 4 matches
markleslie (Division E) 3 matches
sivispacem (Division E) 3 matches
mh5064 (Division F) 4 matches
Rosedelio (Division F) 8 matches

Match completion rate (45 matches in total to be played in each division)
Division A - 8 out of 45 matches completed
Division B - 19 out of 45 matches completed
Division C -14 out of 45 matches completed
Division D - 20 out of 45 matches completed
Division E - 24 out of 45 matches completed
Division F - 32 out of 45 matches completed

Division A is slow, but otherwise these are good match completion rates.

Player of the Week: mh5064 (Division F) with 4 wins this week. :D
stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 14501
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by stockwellpete »

CA charts a-c.png
CA charts a-c.png (115.82 KiB) Viewed 1053 times
CA charts d-f.png
CA charts d-f.png (118.19 KiB) Viewed 1053 times
IMC
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 740
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Hampshire

Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .

Post by IMC »

Division B

IMC - Viking (Ireland) 900-1049 AD with Scots 851-1051 AD allies has beaten (just) Nijis - Armenian 885-1045 AD with Byzantine 963-987 AD allies 61% v 58%

A rare win for IMC

Thanks for the game.
Ian

(3-1)
stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 14501
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by stockwellpete »

LA tables a-d.png
LA tables a-d.png (98.41 KiB) Viewed 1139 times
LA tables e-f.png
LA tables e-f.png (55.69 KiB) Viewed 1139 times
stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 14501
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by stockwellpete »

Weekly round-up
Very much a 2-horse race in Division A now between Nosy_Rat (Lombard) and Questar17 (Bosporan) with both players extending their 100% records this week. At the bottom both Morbio (Roman) and SpeedyCM (Jewish Revolt) are stuck on zero points after 5 matches. In Division B the current score is joggy 32, everyone else 20. :shock: joggy only has 1 match left though while everyone else has 31 matches to overtake him. Warg1 (Arab City) still has a commanding 9 point lead in Division C, where Delbruck (Roman) has moved into second place with his third win. Giacofa93 (Pictish) has started with a win in his first match. Blagrot (Jewish Revolt) is the new leader in Division D after his third win from 3 starts, but 4 other players also still have 100% records. Both Barrold713 (Soissons) and Doyley50 (Palmyran) are already in relegation trouble
though and uregently need to pick up some points. Very interesting situation now in a well-progressed Division E where Badger73 (Palmyran) now has 6 wins from 8 starts, putting him 6 points ahead of Lynx57 (Roman) who has 2 games in hand. It looks to be between these 2 players now, although Darkwater247 (Germanic Horse Tribes) has started with 2 wins from 3. In Division F Hari72 (Sassanid) has strengthened his position at the top with 3 more wins and he has also been helped by the first defeats for challengers heidipie (Jewish Revolt) and shane30 (Palmyran). Meroka37 (Dacian) desperately needs points now to avoid the wooden spoon position.

Unbeaten runs of 3 matches or more
Nosy_Rat (Division A) 5 matches
Questar17 (Division A) 4 matches
joggy (Division B) 8 matches
Delbruck (Division C) 3 matches
Warg1 (Division C) 5 matches
Blagrot (Division D) 3 matches
Badger73 (Division E) 6 matches
Lynx57 (Division E) 3 matches
Hari72 (Division F) 7 matches

Match completion rate (45 matches in total to be played in each division)
Division A - 18 out of 45 matches completed
Division B - 13 out of 45 matches completed
Division C - 15 out of 45 matches completed
Division D - 13 out of 45 matches completed
Division E - 24 out of 45 matches completed
Division F - 28 out of 45 matches completed

These are good match completion rates.

Player of the Week: Hari72 (Division F) who has extended his unbeaten run to 7 matches. :D
Holien
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Posts: 384
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 8:26 pm

Re: Any questions?

Post by Holien »

stockwellpete wrote: Sun Oct 24, 2021 7:52 am
mh5064 wrote: Sat Oct 23, 2021 8:08 pm Hi,

player Lunarfoxx in Classical Antiquity, Division F invoking rule 4 has arbitrarily canceled the battle because it is unfavorable to him.("Rule 4 Match Players may agree to re-start a match within the first three turns if they believe the terrain is likely to produce a sterile match or a draw. The maximum number of re-starts permitted for a single match is two.")
Without having agreed on the thing and without having responded positively. I quote his exact words "I don't known about this terrain. I might wanna redo this" and then "I'll set up the new match. gonna redo it within the 3 turns cuz of terrain".
But the ground was fine for me and certainly would not have produced a drawn or sterile game.
He also benefits from having seen the composition of my army.
I wanted to ask a question about this:
Is this kind of attitude regular?
Thanks

Cheers
I hope it is not, because it is against the rule. Rule 4 is quite clear . . .

"Players may agree to re-start a match within the first three turns if they believe the terrain is likely to produce a sterile match or a draw. The maximum number of re-starts permitted for a single match is two."

The key word here is "agree". What I can do is pass the match to our adjudication panel, if you so wish. Please let me know.
Maybe English is not his native language and it is too nuanced?

Perhaps if they had been able to chat about it?

:wink:
devoncop
Sr. Colonel - Battleship
Sr. Colonel - Battleship
Posts: 1641
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:46 am

Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by devoncop »

Division D

devoncop - Khorasanian 821-1003 AD with Ghaznavid 962-1187 AD allies (1200) challenges Garokan Spanish 900-1049 AD with Andalusian 756-1049 AD allies

Password : devoncop1

PM sent
Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory II Digital League”