AA as AT - what about the GAZ and T90?

A new story begins...
The sequel to a real classic: Panzer Corps is back!

Moderator: Panzer Corps 2 Moderators

Post Reply
Catacol
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz  251/1
Posts: 129
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 12:09 pm

AA as AT - what about the GAZ and T90?

Post by Catacol »

AA doubles up as AT, sometimes to devastating effect. But not so for the T90 or the GAZ. They are classified as tanks. I've posted this in the bug thread but thought I'd ask the community the question as well. Anyone know why? The T90 can serve as a tank in desperate times - but the GAZ? Ummmm - no.

Is it a bug? Why is all other AA convertible to AT but not these 2 Russian vehicles?
Stormchaser
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 263
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:38 am

Re: AA as AT - what about the GAZ and T90?

Post by Stormchaser »

I think it's intended.

As for why Tanks?
Well, I belive it has to do with their main guns. Both the Gaz and the T-90 are armed with machine guns, which while capable of shooting down aircraft are very poor weapons against tanks. So making them AT guns doesn't really fit.
Ultimately, Tank is the best fit after that, as a self-propelled vehicle that can fight against Infantry.
jeannot le lapin
1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18
1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18
Posts: 828
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2017 3:29 pm

Re: AA as AT - what about the GAZ and T90?

Post by jeannot le lapin »

USA:

Sherman Skink: Anti-air, Alternate Tank
VirgilInTheSKY
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1044
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 4:26 pm

Re: AA as AT - what about the GAZ and T90?

Post by VirgilInTheSKY »

Another interesting one is the Vickers AA, while also armed with machineguns, this one switches to AT, not tank like the GAZ-AA.
Stormchaser
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 263
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:38 am

Re: AA as AT - what about the GAZ and T90?

Post by Stormchaser »

The Sherman Skink, while armed with 20mm guns, was a late war development, by which time lighter AT guns had pretty much become obsolete in the face of the heavier armor of late war tanks, so it still makes sense to not become an AT vehicle with an ineffective weapon for the job.

I have no idea how to explain the Vickers AA. It has Machine Guns, early war, and yet becomes an AT. :roll:
PoorOldSpike
Sr. Colonel - Battleship
Sr. Colonel - Battleship
Posts: 1660
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:06 pm
Location: Plymouth, England

Re: AA as AT - what about the GAZ and T90?

Post by PoorOldSpike »

Catacol wrote: Tue Aug 24, 2021 9:39 pm AA doubles up as AT, sometimes to devastating effect. But not so for the T90 or the GAZ. They are classified as tanks..

Their popguns hitting power against Hard targets in Tank mode (below) can barely scratch the paintwork of enemy tanks, so best use them against infantry, trucks, light armour etc.
T-90 = 10
GAZ = 7

For the record here are the Russian AA units ratings against Hard targets when switched to AT mode-
85mm = 25
Yag = 24
SU-11 = 23
SU-6 = 18
37mm = 14
37ZIS = 14
M17 = 10

For comparison these are the ratings of some tanks against Hard targets-
JS-3 = 32
T-34/85 = 25
T-34/43 = 21
T-26 = 13
T-60 = 10

Noob note- don't worry too much if an enemy ground unit catches your AA unit with its pants down in AA mode, because it'll still be able to defend itself, but at reduced firepower.
Example- the 85 in AA mode defends itself at 14 against a Hard attacker, so the morale is that if enemy tanks are getting close to your AA units and you want to stand your ground, switch to AT mode while you still can, and the 85 will be able to hit with a rating of 25..:)
Catacol
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz  251/1
Posts: 129
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 12:09 pm

Re: AA as AT - what about the GAZ and T90?

Post by Catacol »

PoorOldSpike wrote: Sat Aug 28, 2021 7:53 am
Catacol wrote: Tue Aug 24, 2021 9:39 pm AA doubles up as AT, sometimes to devastating effect. But not so for the T90 or the GAZ. They are classified as tanks..

Their popguns hitting power against Hard targets in Tank mode (below) can barely scratch the paintwork of enemy tanks, so best use them against infantry, trucks, light armour etc.
T-90 = 10
GAZ = 7

For the record here are the Russian AA units ratings against Hard targets when switched to AT mode-
85mm = 25
Yag = 24
SU-11 = 23
SU-6 = 18
37mm = 14
37ZIS = 14
M17 = 10

For comparison these are the ratings of some tanks against Hard targets-
JS-3 = 32
T-34/85 = 25
T-34/43 = 21
T-26 = 13
T-60 = 10

Noob note- don't worry too much if an enemy ground unit catches your AA unit with its pants down in AA mode, because it'll still be able to defend itself, but at reduced firepower.
Example- the 85 in AA mode defends itself at 14 against a Hard attacker, so the morale is that if enemy tanks are getting close to your AA units and you want to stand your ground, switch to AT mode while you still can, and the 85 will be able to hit with a rating of 25..:)
Agreed on power, but not necessarily on use. Playing on big multiplayer maps of 80 x 80 (for example) and force sizes up over 400 slots per side means that mobile units are widespread. As a result unlike on small maps where no player would ever advance with armoured cars or light tanks, there are frequent cases in games I design where 8 wheeled ACs or T60s or any of the faster, light units try to penetrate flanks or surround formations. In these circumstances AA as AT has value in protecting infantry. Germany can do it with all their 20mm and 37mm pieces of kit but a Russian player cannot do it with any of the self propelled units and that is a disadvantage. It must just be an oversight in game design, because I can't see any real reason why these 2 Russian units would have been singled out.
Post Reply

Return to “Panzer Corps 2”