Earliest Date of Knights?

A forum for any questions relating to army design, the army companion books and upcoming lists.

Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

Post Reply
GHGAustin
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Posts: 398
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 6:42 pm
Location: Austin, Texas USA
Contact:

Earliest Date of Knights?

Post by GHGAustin »

What is the earliest date that knights are allowed in any army in the current army lists? From what I can tell, it is 1041 for the Normans. Any others earlier than that?

The reason I ask is that we are planning a Fall tournament and want to have two divisions. The Classical division will be armies from before the rise of knights and the Chivalric division after. My thought is to set a date for the first availability of knights and if your army is before that, you are in the Classic division and after that in the Chivalric division. If you army list crosses the dividing line, then you declare the date of your army to determine which division you are in.

Thanks
Rob Smith
Great Hall Games
Austin, TX
www.greathallminis.com
ethan
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Posts: 1284
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 9:40 pm

Post by ethan »

Personally I think Heavily Armored knights are much more significant than armored knights.
david53
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 9:01 pm
Location: Manchester

Post by david53 »

ethan wrote:Personally I think Heavily Armored knights are much more significant than armored knights.

Any type of Knights gets the two dice bonus............. :)
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

ethan wrote:Personally I think Heavily Armored knights are much more significant than armored knights.
Agreed, however, for the original question if you use 1040 as the cut you'll be safe.
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
hazelbark
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4957
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Capital of the World !!

Post by hazelbark »

david53 wrote:
ethan wrote:Personally I think Heavily Armored knights are much more significant than armored knights.

Any type of Knights gets the two dice bonus............. :)
Yes but so do chariots and Elephants. The HA Knights are an order of magnitude tougher than just plain armoured KN.
Fulgrim
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Posts: 119
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 6:06 pm

Post by Fulgrim »

Deleted - realized how OT it was.
Last edited by Fulgrim on Thu Jun 11, 2009 8:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
GHGAustin
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Posts: 398
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 6:42 pm
Location: Austin, Texas USA
Contact:

Post by GHGAustin »

nikgaukroger wrote:Agreed, however, for the original question if you use 1040 as the cut you'll be safe.
Thanks Nik! :D
Rob Smith
Great Hall Games
Austin, TX
www.greathallminis.com
Post Reply

Return to “Army Design”