The Dustbin
Moderator: Field of Glory 2 Tournaments Managers
-
- Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 4:59 pm
- Location: The California Central Coast Wine Country
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Division C
ulysisgrunt (Gallic 300-101 BC with Samnite allies)
challenges
phoyle3290 (Macedonian 320-261 with Greek allies)
pw: phoyle3290
paulmcneil (Galatians 63-25 and Roman allies)
pw: paulmcneil
Ironclad(Romans 199-106 with Pergamene allies)
pw: Ironclad
ulysisgrunt (Gallic 300-101 BC with Samnite allies)
challenges
phoyle3290 (Macedonian 320-261 with Greek allies)
pw: phoyle3290
paulmcneil (Galatians 63-25 and Roman allies)
pw: paulmcneil
Ironclad(Romans 199-106 with Pergamene allies)
pw: Ironclad
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division F
Malabar26 (Indian (Rajput) 650-1049 AD with Indian (Hindu North) 600-1049 AD allies) defeats wmpryor (Pictish 477-850 AD with Scots-Irish 477-899 AD allies) 45-4.
Lots of careful manoeuvers against a (mostly) concealed opponent until the Picts suffered disruptions in cascade.
Malabar26 (Indian (Rajput) 650-1049 AD with Indian (Hindu North) 600-1049 AD allies) defeats wmpryor (Pictish 477-850 AD with Scots-Irish 477-899 AD allies) 45-4.
Lots of careful manoeuvers against a (mostly) concealed opponent until the Picts suffered disruptions in cascade.
-
- Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Re: Army allocations now available for High Middle Ages . . .
Well Mark you, LuciusSulla, PompeytheFlatulant and Pantherboy aren't there so it can't be that difficultnyczar wrote: ↑Fri Feb 12, 2021 7:08 pm This is the tournament for the ages. I will happily spectate as I don't think I could survive the stress of playing in either of the divisions I would be placed in. Any medal at any age in any division is a feat. The skill and experience of the "A" division is the best I have seen in a long time...many seasons. A bronze won there is worth a gold in any age or division, in my opinion.
Good luck commanders, I look forward to the drama and I am hoping Snugglebunnies is planning a new series for his channel.![]()
Mark.

-
- Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2020 8:34 am
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division E
Darkwater247 - Alan 651-1049 AD (1600) defeats deeter - Arab Conquest 629-637 AD (1600) 56-29
The Alans managed to get a win, largely thanks to their lancers seeing off the arab cav, allowing for the horse archers to shoot and run at the spearmen.
Thankyou Deeter for the game (a pleasure)
Darkwater247 - Alan 651-1049 AD (1600) defeats deeter - Arab Conquest 629-637 AD (1600) 56-29
The Alans managed to get a win, largely thanks to their lancers seeing off the arab cav, allowing for the horse archers to shoot and run at the spearmen.
Thankyou Deeter for the game (a pleasure)
-
- Master Sergeant - U-boat
- Posts: 515
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 1:07 pm
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
desertedfox - Gallic 300-101 BC with Samnite 355-272 allies defeated Aetius39 - Pyrrhic 280-275 BC with Samnite 355-272 BC allies 51 - 25
Thx for a GG.
desertedfox - Gallic 300-101 BC with Samnite 355-272 allies defeated Aetius39 - Pyrrhic 280-275 BC with Samnite 355-272 BC allies 51 - 25
Thx for a GG.
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division A
Questar17 - Etruscan 330-280 BC with Gallic 300-101 BC allies beat ericdoman1 - Rhoxolani 350 BC-24 AD with Skythian 300 BC-50 AD allies 62:48
Good but too long game vs ericdoman1 army. For sure the opponent should score any points as imo he maneouvred his troops much better than me.
till next one:)
Questar17 - Etruscan 330-280 BC with Gallic 300-101 BC allies beat ericdoman1 - Rhoxolani 350 BC-24 AD with Skythian 300 BC-50 AD allies 62:48
Good but too long game vs ericdoman1 army. For sure the opponent should score any points as imo he maneouvred his troops much better than me.
till next one:)
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division C
toska - Syracusan 280-211 BC with Carthaginian 235-146 BC allies beat TomoeGozen - Pyrrhic 280-275 BC with Samnite 355-272 BC allies 45-17
toska - Syracusan 280-211 BC with Carthaginian 235-146 BC allies beat TomoeGozen - Pyrrhic 280-275 BC with Samnite 355-272 BC allies 45-17
Re: High Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division D
olin0111 (Russian 1155-1264 AD with Polish 1200-1319 AD) beat joggy (Teutonic Order 1226-1319 AD) 47-11
olin0111 (Russian 1155-1264 AD with Polish 1200-1319 AD) beat joggy (Teutonic Order 1226-1319 AD) 47-11
Re: High Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Div E
toska - English 1155-1271 AD with Welsh (South) 1100-1197 AD allies (1200)
challenges
Barrold713 - Teutonic Order 1226-1319 AD (1600)
Blagrot - Scots 1155-1161 AD with Scots (Isles and Highlands) 1050-1319 AD allies (1200)
Darkwater247 - Scottish 1162-1319 AD with Scots Isles 1050-1319 AD allies (1200)
Kerait - German (Imperial) 1200-1319 AD with Hungarian 1200-1319 AD allies (1200)
password: 1234
PM sent to all
toska - English 1155-1271 AD with Welsh (South) 1100-1197 AD allies (1200)
challenges
Barrold713 - Teutonic Order 1226-1319 AD (1600)
Blagrot - Scots 1155-1161 AD with Scots (Isles and Highlands) 1050-1319 AD allies (1200)
Darkwater247 - Scottish 1162-1319 AD with Scots Isles 1050-1319 AD allies (1200)
Kerait - German (Imperial) 1200-1319 AD with Hungarian 1200-1319 AD allies (1200)
password: 1234
PM sent to all
-
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 7:42 pm
- Location: Italy
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division C
Conteshard Norman 923-1040 AD with French 888-1049 AD (1600) draw with Karvon Scots 851-1051 AD with Viking 790-899 AD allies (1200) 3-3
Karvon found a lovely wood in the corner and invited me for a picnic. I had to take a rain check having a previous engagement
(0-0)
Conteshard Norman 923-1040 AD with French 888-1049 AD (1600) draw with Karvon Scots 851-1051 AD with Viking 790-899 AD allies (1200) 3-3
Karvon found a lovely wood in the corner and invited me for a picnic. I had to take a rain check having a previous engagement

(0-0)
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division F
Delbruck (Early Ach Persians) defeats MarcoCato75 (Romans) 61-35.
The veteran legions ravaged my sparabara, but the Immortals, Greeks, and Persian cavalry managed to overcome the remainder of the Romans to pull off a victory. Good game.
Delbruck (Early Ach Persians) defeats MarcoCato75 (Romans) 61-35.
The veteran legions ravaged my sparabara, but the Immortals, Greeks, and Persian cavalry managed to overcome the remainder of the Romans to pull off a victory. Good game.
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division F
Delbruck (Persians) & MadMaxBot (Macedonians) fought to a draw 29-27
(2-2)
Delbruck (Persians) & MadMaxBot (Macedonians) fought to a draw 29-27
(2-2)
-
- General - King Tiger
- Posts: 3776
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 6:43 pm
- Location: Wales
Re: High Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
delete
Last edited by ericdoman1 on Tue Feb 16, 2021 10:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2019 8:14 am
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
Challenge1 - Palmyran 258-273 AD v SLancaster - Scots-Irish 50 BC-476 AD
My opponent conceeded the match and awarded me the win.
(4-0)
Challenge1 - Palmyran 258-273 AD v SLancaster - Scots-Irish 50 BC-476 AD
My opponent conceeded the match and awarded me the win.
(4-0)
-
- Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Division A
Cunningcairn - Indo-Scythian 95BC to 50AD with Indian 500 BC-319 AD ally
challenges
Questar17 - Etruscan 330-280 BC with Gallic 300-101 BC allies (1600)
sunnyboy - Roman 219-200 BC with Pergamene 262-191 BC allies (1600)
PW is classical
PM sent
Cunningcairn - Indo-Scythian 95BC to 50AD with Indian 500 BC-319 AD ally
challenges
Questar17 - Etruscan 330-280 BC with Gallic 300-101 BC allies (1600)
sunnyboy - Roman 219-200 BC with Pergamene 262-191 BC allies (1600)
PW is classical
PM sent
-
- Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division A
Cunningcairn - Indo-Scythian 95BC to 50AD with Indian 500 BC-319 AD ally draws with ericdoman1 - Rhoxolani 350 BC-24 AD with Skythian 300 BC-50 AD allies 58-52
(2-2)
Cunningcairn - Indo-Scythian 95BC to 50AD with Indian 500 BC-319 AD ally draws with ericdoman1 - Rhoxolani 350 BC-24 AD with Skythian 300 BC-50 AD allies 58-52
(2-2)
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division E
carpenkm - Roman 24 BC–196 AD with Sarmatian 25-375 AD allies defeated Badger73 - Palmyran 258-273 AD 65 - 45
A great match which i'm not sure how i won! It genuinely could have gone either way and was only really decided by a sudden collapse of three Auxiliaries and a cataphract who suddenly decided that like under Rome really wasn't that bad at all (roads, wine, education, sanitation.......) Sudden collapses summed up the match - i guess my troops were marginally less pathetic than my opponent's and more likely to rally and hang around at the back watching safely at a distance.
Good fun, tough game and good chat - thanks Badger
carpenkm - Roman 24 BC–196 AD with Sarmatian 25-375 AD allies defeated Badger73 - Palmyran 258-273 AD 65 - 45
A great match which i'm not sure how i won! It genuinely could have gone either way and was only really decided by a sudden collapse of three Auxiliaries and a cataphract who suddenly decided that like under Rome really wasn't that bad at all (roads, wine, education, sanitation.......) Sudden collapses summed up the match - i guess my troops were marginally less pathetic than my opponent's and more likely to rally and hang around at the back watching safely at a distance.
Good fun, tough game and good chat - thanks Badger
-
- Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Re: High Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Division A
Cunningcairn - Danish 1200-1319 AD with German (Imperial) 1200-1319 AD allies (1200)
challenges
XLegione - Teutonic Order 1226-1319 AD with Polish 1200-1319 AD allies (1200)
sunnyboy - Bohemian 1050-1154 AD (1200)
ianiow - German (Imperial) 1200-1319 AD with Free Canton 1200-1319 AD allies (1200)
PW is high
PM sent
Cunningcairn - Danish 1200-1319 AD with German (Imperial) 1200-1319 AD allies (1200)
challenges
XLegione - Teutonic Order 1226-1319 AD with Polish 1200-1319 AD allies (1200)
sunnyboy - Bohemian 1050-1154 AD (1200)
ianiow - German (Imperial) 1200-1319 AD with Free Canton 1200-1319 AD allies (1200)
PW is high
PM sent
-
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2018 11:48 am
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division F
Marcocato75 - Sassanid Persian 350 AD-476 AD defeats Zawzgrzyt - Dacian 89-106 AD with Sarmatian 25-375 AD allies 44-7
More though that the results shows, the game ended just in time for the Sassanids
Well played Zawzgrzyt
Marcocato75 - Sassanid Persian 350 AD-476 AD defeats Zawzgrzyt - Dacian 89-106 AD with Sarmatian 25-375 AD allies 44-7
More though that the results shows, the game ended just in time for the Sassanids
Well played Zawzgrzyt
Re: Themed Event: winners post your results here . . .
Pool B Group 2
Deeter (Indian 500BC-319AD) defeats iandavidsmith (Seleucid 320-303BC) 40-11.
Deeter
Latest standings
1. deeter 2-8
2. tmac11 0-0
3.iandavidsmith 2-0
Deeter (Indian 500BC-319AD) defeats iandavidsmith (Seleucid 320-303BC) 40-11.
Deeter
Latest standings
1. deeter 2-8
2. tmac11 0-0
3.iandavidsmith 2-0