The Dustbin
Moderator: Field of Glory 2 Tournaments Managers
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Please use the following format when reporting your results . . .
Division A
hidde (Arab City) beat stockwellpete (Sassanid Persian) 50-25
It is very helpful to me if we all get used to reporting the results in the same way, so please report the score as 50-25 rather than 25-50 when you have won. This avoids much confusion when discussing match situations by PM with regards to adjudication or some other issue regarding the rules of the tournament.
Division A
hidde (Arab City) beat stockwellpete (Sassanid Persian) 50-25
It is very helpful to me if we all get used to reporting the results in the same way, so please report the score as 50-25 rather than 25-50 when you have won. This avoids much confusion when discussing match situations by PM with regards to adjudication or some other issue regarding the rules of the tournament.
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Please use the following format when reporting your results . . .
Division A
hidde (Arab Conquest) beat stockwellpete (Pecheneg) 50-25
It is very helpful to me if we all get used to reporting the results in the same way, so please report the score as 50-25 rather than 25-50 when you have won. This avoids much confusion when discussing match situations by PM with regards to adjudication or some other issue regarding the rules of the tournament.
Division A
hidde (Arab Conquest) beat stockwellpete (Pecheneg) 50-25
It is very helpful to me if we all get used to reporting the results in the same way, so please report the score as 50-25 rather than 25-50 when you have won. This avoids much confusion when discussing match situations by PM with regards to adjudication or some other issue regarding the rules of the tournament.
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
Please use the following format when reporting your results . . .
Division A
hidde (Medians) beat stockwellpete (Assyrians) 50-25
It is very helpful to me if we all get used to reporting the results in the same way, so please report the score as 50-25 rather than 25-50 when you have won. This avoids much confusion when discussing match situations by PM with regards to adjudication or some other issue regarding the rules of the tournament.
Division A
hidde (Medians) beat stockwellpete (Assyrians) 50-25
It is very helpful to me if we all get used to reporting the results in the same way, so please report the score as 50-25 rather than 25-50 when you have won. This avoids much confusion when discussing match situations by PM with regards to adjudication or some other issue regarding the rules of the tournament.
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Themed Event: winners post your results here . . .
Please use the following format when reporting your results . . .
Pool A Group 1
hidde (Seleucid) beat stockwellpete (Indian) 50-25
It is very helpful to me if we all get used to reporting the results in the same way, so please report the score as 50-25 rather than 25-50 when you have won. This avoids much confusion when discussing match situations by PM with regards to adjudication or some other issue regarding the rules of the tournament.
Pool A Group 1
hidde (Seleucid) beat stockwellpete (Indian) 50-25
It is very helpful to me if we all get used to reporting the results in the same way, so please report the score as 50-25 rather than 25-50 when you have won. This avoids much confusion when discussing match situations by PM with regards to adjudication or some other issue regarding the rules of the tournament.
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: Army allocations and divisional line-up for Biblical . . .
Army allocations posted. Please note that the C and D divisions are still provisional. All the army allocations are definite though.
-
Geffalrus
- Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D

- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Virginia, USA
Re: Army allocations and divisional line-up for Early Middle Ages . . .
Well shoot, I can't turn down an opportunity to play Byzantines in Early Medieval. Count me in.
Byzantine 988-1041 AD
Norman 923-1040 AD
Arab (Conquest) 638-684 AD
Anglo-Danish 1017-1041 AD with Welsh Allies
Byzantine 988-1041 AD
Norman 923-1040 AD
Arab (Conquest) 638-684 AD
Anglo-Danish 1017-1041 AD with Welsh Allies
We should all Stand With Ukraine.

-
Geffalrus
- Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D

- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Virginia, USA
Re: Early Middle Ages is full: reserve places only . . .
I'm in.
1) Byzantine 988-1041 AD
2) Norman 923-1040 AD
3) Arab (Conquest) 638-684 AD
4) Anglo-Danish 1017-1041 AD with Welsh Allies
1) Byzantine 988-1041 AD
2) Norman 923-1040 AD
3) Arab (Conquest) 638-684 AD
4) Anglo-Danish 1017-1041 AD with Welsh Allies
We should all Stand With Ukraine.

-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: Tournament News and Diary . . .
Geffalrus has replaced ConstantinIX in Early Middle Ages Division A.
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Biblical section is full again . . .
I have put a call out for Breogan but there has been no reply as yet. If there is anyone else who would like to play in Biblical this season, preferably with a FOG2DL rating somewhere between 1.00 and 4.00, please let me know. The place is offered on a first come, first served basis.
Re: Any Questions . . .
When will high middle ages finish? 18/4 same as the others or a fortnight later? Same question for time control checks I guess too?
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: Tournament News and Diary . . .
There is one place left in Biblical that is now open for anyone to take. First come, first served.
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: Any Questions . . .
It will finish the same time as the other sections on 18th April, although I may allow short 3 day extensions at the end if there are still promotion and relegation issues outstanding. There will be just one Time Control check for High Middle Ages after 3 weeks (on the same day as the 2nd Time Control check for everything else) to make sure everyone has got one match finished and there are no non-starters.Blagrot wrote: Sat Jan 30, 2021 9:01 am When will high middle ages finish? 18/4 same as the others or a fortnight later? Same question for time control checks I guess too?
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: Please do not start your matches until Monday . . .
I can see one player trying to start their matches early. Please don't start until February 1st as a courtesy to other players. I will actually be opening the threads at 6pm UK time tomorrow evening so that players in Australia/New Zealand/Japan can start promptly if they want to.
Re: Army allocations and divisional line-up for Biblical . . .
I can play 1200 or 1600 as my opponent prefer.
Have a nice league
Have a nice league
Re: Army allocations and divisional line-up for Biblical . . .
I can play as reserve if need, 1200 or 1600 don't matter
Urartian 681-585
Good game for all
Urartian 681-585
Good game for all
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: There is a vacancy in the Biblical section . . .
The vacancy has been filled now. Thanks.
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: Army allocations and divisional line-up for Biblical . . .
Biblical divisions now confirmed. deeter will stay in Division C and Tratmot has joined Division D.
Re: Army allocations and divisional line-up for Early Middle Ages . . .
What will be the point size of the armies?
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: Army allocations and divisional line-up for Early Middle Ages . . .
Default size in Early Middle Ages is 1200 points. Matches can be played at 1600 points if both players agree. See the number in brackets at the end of each player's entry in the first post to see their preference.
Re: Classical Antiquity is full: reserve places only . . .
These are my army selections for this section.
1 Greek 227-146 BC with Roman 280-220 BC ally
2 Samnite 355-272 BC with Gallic allies
3 Indo-Scythian 95BC to 50AD with Indian 500 BC-319 AD ally
4 Egyptian 405-343 BC (Rise of Persia DLC) with Libyan 549 - 301 BC Allies
and I prefer 1600 points.
Thank you.
1 Greek 227-146 BC with Roman 280-220 BC ally
2 Samnite 355-272 BC with Gallic allies
3 Indo-Scythian 95BC to 50AD with Indian 500 BC-319 AD ally
4 Egyptian 405-343 BC (Rise of Persia DLC) with Libyan 549 - 301 BC Allies
and I prefer 1600 points.
Thank you.



