Future Companion Books rec.

Huaxtec15mm · Post by **Huaxtec15mm** » Sat May 16, 2009 1:32 pm

I have 4 companion army books so far. I have found them to be surprisingly well done and better than most of the reviews give them credit for.

I have found one way to turn them from good to great however (possibly for Napoleonic, Renaissance, or the Asian or Americas books if possible!).

The army books for "Ancient Warfare" and "Medieval Warfare" rules (both by Terry Gore) include a list of historical opponenets for each army list. I have found this very helpful for armies I am not as familiar with (and even some I am very familiar with!).

Just a small request/ suggestion. Hope that its received well.

philqw78 · Post by **philqw78** » Sat May 16, 2009 2:23 pm

I could do the Napoleonic one now.

French
Everyone Else

Everyone Else
French

dave_r · Post by **dave_r** » Sat May 16, 2009 2:34 pm

I could do the Napoleonic one now.

French
Everyone Else

Everyone Else
French

What about the Austrians?

spike · Post by **spike** » Sat May 16, 2009 5:26 pm

dave_r wrote:
I could do the Napoleonic one now.

French
Everyone Else

Everyone Else
French
What about the Austrians?

"Kaiser Franz and his undying empire"

They could have titles like "The tricolour rising", "Eagles triumphant" and "The hunded days war"

NicktheLemming · Post by **NicktheLemming** » Sat May 16, 2009 7:42 pm

dave_r wrote:
I could do the Napoleonic one now.

French
Everyone Else

Everyone Else
French
What about the Austrians?

"The French and / or Everyone Else"

grahambriggs · Post by **grahambriggs** » Sat May 16, 2009 8:34 pm

Too late for all the ancients books I'm afraid. For example we finished Blood and Gold shortly after Christmas.

madaxeman · Post by **madaxeman** » Sat May 16, 2009 9:58 pm

It might be too late for the books, however it is a good idea that I might try to add into the structure of the WIKI - how about this as an example?

http://www.madaxeman.com/wiki2/tiki-ind ... ican+Roman

DaiSho · Post by **DaiSho** » Sat May 16, 2009 11:13 pm

Huaxtec15mm wrote:I have found one way to turn them from good to great however... for Napoleonic... include a list of historical opponenets for each army list.

Yes, it wouldn't take much:

French - everyone
everyone else - French.

Huaxtec15mm · Post by **Huaxtec15mm** » Sat May 16, 2009 11:23 pm

madaxeman wrote:It might be too late for the books, however it is a good idea that I might try to add into the structure of the WIKI - how about this as an example?

http://www.madaxeman.com/wiki2/tiki-ind ... ican+Roman

Very nice Max!

carlos · Post by **carlos** » Sun May 17, 2009 1:52 am

Not same army names most of the time, but still damn useful:

http://dbaol.com/armies_detailed.htm

OldenTired · Post by **OldenTired** » Sun May 17, 2009 3:20 am

carlos wrote:Not same army names most of the time, but still damn useful:

http://dbaol.com/armies_detailed.htm

i have a question.

why is everyone on that site white?

philqw78 · Post by **philqw78** » Sun May 17, 2009 7:45 am

OldenTired wrote:i have a question.

why is everyone on that site white?

They're not

Future Companion Books rec.

Future Companion Books rec.

Re: Future Companion Books rec.