The Dustbin
Moderator: Field of Glory 2 Tournaments Managers
Re: kraff has won Classical Antiquity Division C!
Hi Kraff,
as I said in my PM, congratulations on winning the division title.
It was really well deserved, as there have been some cracking games and great play from everyone in the division.
Good luck in Division B next year.
Regards Stew.
as I said in my PM, congratulations on winning the division title.
It was really well deserved, as there have been some cracking games and great play from everyone in the division.
Good luck in Division B next year.
Regards Stew.
Re: Aetius39 has won Early Middle Ages Division C!
Hi Aetius,
as I said in the earlier PM, my congratulations on winning the division title.
It was really well deserved, with a great record posted.
I'll miss our games in the next season, but it will give me the opportunity to grow my finger nails back!
Good luck for next season.
Play the Division B 'big boys' like you've just done to our division and you'll have another successful competition.
Regards Stew.
as I said in the earlier PM, my congratulations on winning the division title.
It was really well deserved, with a great record posted.
I'll miss our games in the next season, but it will give me the opportunity to grow my finger nails back!
Good luck for next season.
Play the Division B 'big boys' like you've just done to our division and you'll have another successful competition.
Regards Stew.
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your result here . . .
Division A
Questar17 - Carthaginian (Hannibal in Italy) 218-217 BC beat desertedfox - Macedonian 328-321 BC 42:17
With some luck and good flanking moves on both edges of the hill, i reached to break opponent pikes defense
thx for the game
Questar17 - Carthaginian (Hannibal in Italy) 218-217 BC beat desertedfox - Macedonian 328-321 BC 42:17
With some luck and good flanking moves on both edges of the hill, i reached to break opponent pikes defense
thx for the game
-
kronenblatt
- General - Carrier

- Posts: 4695
- Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:17 pm
- Location: Stockholm, SWEDEN
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your result here . . .
Division F
kronenblatt (Pyrrhic 280-275 BC with Samnite 355-272 BC allies) beat hscic (Armenian (Tigranes) 83 - 69 BC) 46-11.
kronenblatt (Pyrrhic 280-275 BC with Samnite 355-272 BC allies) beat hscic (Armenian (Tigranes) 83 - 69 BC) 46-11.
kronenblatt's campaign and tournament thread hub:
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
-
desertedfox
- Master Sergeant - U-boat

- Posts: 515
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 1:07 pm
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
desertedfox - Rus 960-1053 AD with Polish 966-1057 allies defeated lydianed - Arab Umayyad 685-750 AD with Moorish 350-698 AD allies 62 - 33
Thx for a tough game. It was actually quite close for most of the battle.
desertedfox - Rus 960-1053 AD with Polish 966-1057 allies defeated lydianed - Arab Umayyad 685-750 AD with Moorish 350-698 AD allies 62 - 33
Thx for a tough game. It was actually quite close for most of the battle.
-
Macedonczyk
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1

- Posts: 132
- Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2019 10:25 pm
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division A
Macedonczyk (Andalusian 756 -1049 AD) defeated XLegione (Arab Conquest 638-684 AD) 43:8
Macedonczyk (Andalusian 756 -1049 AD) defeated XLegione (Arab Conquest 638-684 AD) 43:8
-
Macedonczyk
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1

- Posts: 132
- Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2019 10:25 pm
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division A
Macedonczyk (Andalusian 756 -1049 AD) defeated Triarii (Dailami 928-1055 AD with Arab (Syria/Iraq) 890-1008 AD) 52:19
Macedonczyk (Andalusian 756 -1049 AD) defeated Triarii (Dailami 928-1055 AD with Arab (Syria/Iraq) 890-1008 AD) 52:19
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division A
sunnyboy (Arab City) defeats Questar17 (Byzantine) 47-21
Thanks for the game!
sunnyboy (Arab City) defeats Questar17 (Byzantine) 47-21
Thanks for the game!
-
desertedfox
- Master Sergeant - U-boat

- Posts: 515
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 1:07 pm
Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
Division A
desertedfox Persian 545-481 BC defeated nyczar Indian 500 BC-319 AD 42 -13
desertedfox Persian 545-481 BC defeated nyczar Indian 500 BC-319 AD 42 -13
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: Themed Event: winners post your results here . . .
Pool A semi-final
klayeckles (Persians) beat Nijis (Indians) 51-15
Nijis (Persians) drew with klayeckles (Indians) 54-43
Received by PM
klayeckles wins 1-0 with 1 match drawn and goes through to the final.
klayeckles (Persians) beat Nijis (Indians) 51-15
Nijis (Persians) drew with klayeckles (Indians) 54-43
Received by PM
klayeckles wins 1-0 with 1 match drawn and goes through to the final.
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: Tournament News and Diary . . .
harveylh will play klayeckles in the Pool A final of the Themed Event.stockwellpete wrote: ↑Sun Nov 22, 2020 1:16 pm There have been some very exciting Themed Event semi-final matches this season. The line-up for the 2 finals is looking like this with just one pairing to be decided.
Pool A: harveylh v klayeckles or Nijis
Pool B: TomoeGozen v Aetius39
The finals will get under way on Thursday.
-
kronenblatt
- General - Carrier

- Posts: 4695
- Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:17 pm
- Location: Stockholm, SWEDEN
Re: Tournament News and Diary . . .
Have two good fights, friends!
That one I'd love to watch live! Good luck both of you!stockwellpete wrote: ↑Fri Nov 27, 2020 8:56 am harveylh will play klayeckles in the Pool A final of the Themed Event.
kronenblatt's campaign and tournament thread hub:
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your result here . . .
Division C
oscarius - Spanish (Sertorius) 80-70 B beats bomber23 - Seleucid 166-125 BC with Jewish 163-111 BC allies: 41 - 6
A hill in my favour and a piecemeal assault by my opponent resulted in defeat in detail of my foe.
oscarius - Spanish (Sertorius) 80-70 B beats bomber23 - Seleucid 166-125 BC with Jewish 163-111 BC allies: 41 - 6
A hill in my favour and a piecemeal assault by my opponent resulted in defeat in detail of my foe.
-
Sennacherib
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF

- Posts: 253
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:19 pm
- Location: France
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your result here . . .
Division A
Sennacherib ( Thracian ) defeat Questar 17 ( Carthaginians ) 41/13
Sennacherib ( Thracian ) defeat Questar 17 ( Carthaginians ) 41/13
Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
Division A
nyczar Persian 545-481 BC defeated desertedfox Indian 500 BC-319 AD 51-25%
nyczar Persian 545-481 BC defeated desertedfox Indian 500 BC-319 AD 51-25%
Re: Themed Event: arrange your matches here . . .
Pool A Final
harveylh challenges klayeckles in the Official scenario - Chaironeia 338BC (Greek v Macedonian), mirror match, pw klay, pm sent
harveylh challenges klayeckles in the Official scenario - Chaironeia 338BC (Greek v Macedonian), mirror match, pw klay, pm sent
We should all Stand With Ukraine.

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division F
toska - Sassanid Persian 250-476 AD with Arab 300-636 AD allies tie Darkwater247 - Gepid 493-567 AD 0-0
We both stay in our positions.
(0-0)
toska - Sassanid Persian 250-476 AD with Arab 300-636 AD allies tie Darkwater247 - Gepid 493-567 AD 0-0
We both stay in our positions.
(0-0)
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your result here . . .
Division A
Nosy_Rat (Pontic) defeats harveylh (Gallic) 61-44.
Nosy_Rat (Pontic) defeats harveylh (Gallic) 61-44.
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28326
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
Relevance of FOG2 v1.5.33 Open Beta to Digital League
(Pete, if you want to move this to the Rally Point fine. I thought it might be worth giving it an initial airing in its own thread).
The forthcoming v1.5.33 of FOG includes two important things for MP, obviously including the digital league.
1) Fixed bug that in certain circumstances could result in the MP replay playing out unresolved melees in a different order, resulting in different results.
2) In MP Custom Battles the second player will no longer get a move on his first turn, just force selection and deployment like the first player. This is so that if the game goes to the turn limit both players will have had the same number of turns. The Turn Limit has not been increased.
Before we bring out a new version, we beta test it.
http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtop ... 7&t=102082
The beta was announced on 4th November, but as yet we have had no feedback whatsoever. Perhaps that means that there are no issues, but without feedback we have no idea whether anyone has tested MP in v1.5.33, and until we do, we are reluctant to release the update. (With its important bug fix)
So please guys, test the Open Beta, or if you already have, tell us what you have tested. And obviously tell us if there were issues, but equally important tell us if there weren't.
http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtop ... 7&t=102433
So we can get the fixes out to the release version as soon as possible.
The forthcoming v1.5.33 of FOG includes two important things for MP, obviously including the digital league.
1) Fixed bug that in certain circumstances could result in the MP replay playing out unresolved melees in a different order, resulting in different results.
2) In MP Custom Battles the second player will no longer get a move on his first turn, just force selection and deployment like the first player. This is so that if the game goes to the turn limit both players will have had the same number of turns. The Turn Limit has not been increased.
Before we bring out a new version, we beta test it.
http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtop ... 7&t=102082
The beta was announced on 4th November, but as yet we have had no feedback whatsoever. Perhaps that means that there are no issues, but without feedback we have no idea whether anyone has tested MP in v1.5.33, and until we do, we are reluctant to release the update. (With its important bug fix)
So please guys, test the Open Beta, or if you already have, tell us what you have tested. And obviously tell us if there were issues, but equally important tell us if there weren't.
http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtop ... 7&t=102433
So we can get the fixes out to the release version as soon as possible.
Richard Bodley Scott


Re: kraff has won Classical Antiquity Division C!
Thank you very much!
I have never played the Numidian army before this DL season. It turned out to be a very capable army with some very resilient units, although it lacks superior quality troops. Very challenging Division with some very tense battles (especially the last one). A big thank you to all participants for the games. Good luck to you all in the next season!
Raff
I have never played the Numidian army before this DL season. It turned out to be a very capable army with some very resilient units, although it lacks superior quality troops. Very challenging Division with some very tense battles (especially the last one). A big thank you to all participants for the games. Good luck to you all in the next season!
Raff







