The Dustbin
Moderator: Field of Glory 2 Tournaments Managers
-
ericdoman1
- General - King Tiger

- Posts: 3776
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 6:43 pm
- Location: Wales
Re: Tournament News and Diary . . .
OK and thanks
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
-
desertedfox
- Master Sergeant - U-boat

- Posts: 515
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 1:07 pm
Re: Biblical: arrange your matches here . . .
Div A
Assyrian 681-609 BC v Babylonian 626-539 BC with Median 626-550 BC allies (Fall of Assyria 613 BC)
desertedfox challenges hidde
PW = 4321
PM sent
Assyrian 681-609 BC v Babylonian 626-539 BC with Median 626-550 BC allies (Fall of Assyria 613 BC)
desertedfox challenges hidde
PW = 4321
PM sent
-
Challenge1
- Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie

- Posts: 333
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2019 8:14 am
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division C
Challenge1 - Germanic Foot Tribes 260-599 AD with Roman 379-424 AD allies defeated MorkinTheFree - Romano-British 407-599 AD 40-14
Challenge1 - Germanic Foot Tribes 260-599 AD with Roman 379-424 AD allies defeated MorkinTheFree - Romano-British 407-599 AD 40-14
-
Morbio
- Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier

- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:40 pm
- Location: Wokingham, UK
Re: Tournament News and Diary . . .
Oh! Some tough competition coming back... welcome!
-
ericdoman1
- General - King Tiger

- Posts: 3776
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 6:43 pm
- Location: Wales
Re: Tournament News and Diary . . .
Hi m80. Not tough but getting to a bit hard, I think:) Nearly 3 weeks of multiplaying. Pushed cunningcairn a bit think it'll be a 50 + vs 25 result to Martin. how are you, family and friends doing? That goes to everybody in these trying times. Fancy a game, your call. Practice for you in next digital league season. Must have deleted your email address but still got you down in private messages
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division C
SawyerK (Byzantine) barely defeated Bluefin (Alan) by 60-54.
This battle between two all cavalry armies descended into chaos on the third move when the lancers from both battle forces charged. From that point on, there were no battle lines and instead an ever growing number of flank and rear attacks slammed home. As Bluefin stated two thirds of the way through the conflict, the winner would be 'the last man in the saddle' and I was fortunate that turned out to be me.
(3-1)
SawyerK (Byzantine) barely defeated Bluefin (Alan) by 60-54.
This battle between two all cavalry armies descended into chaos on the third move when the lancers from both battle forces charged. From that point on, there were no battle lines and instead an ever growing number of flank and rear attacks slammed home. As Bluefin stated two thirds of the way through the conflict, the winner would be 'the last man in the saddle' and I was fortunate that turned out to be me.
(3-1)
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division E
Morat (Lombards) beat Barrold713 (Palmyrans/Armenians) 62-55
Chaotic battle where the Lombards had early successes on both flanks (with the opposition not much liking the Lombard lancers). Then the fight back - Palmyran foot and archers smashed up the centre and shredded warbands and horse alike. In the end the Lombards just squeaked a win: with the remaining lancers and horse just having enough to get over the line. But it was very close, and could easily have gone the other way.
Many thanks to Barrold713 for a great battle.
M.
(3-1)
Morat (Lombards) beat Barrold713 (Palmyrans/Armenians) 62-55
Chaotic battle where the Lombards had early successes on both flanks (with the opposition not much liking the Lombard lancers). Then the fight back - Palmyran foot and archers smashed up the centre and shredded warbands and horse alike. In the end the Lombards just squeaked a win: with the remaining lancers and horse just having enough to get over the line. But it was very close, and could easily have gone the other way.
Many thanks to Barrold713 for a great battle.
M.
(3-1)
Morat
-
Challenge1
- Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie

- Posts: 333
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2019 8:14 am
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Division B
Challenge1 Carthaginian v lunecastle Lysimachid
PM sent
Challenge1 Carthaginian v lunecastle Lysimachid
PM sent
-
Challenge1
- Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie

- Posts: 333
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2019 8:14 am
Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Division B
Challenge1 Carthaginian v lydianed Arab Umayyad
PM sent
Challenge1 Carthaginian v lydianed Arab Umayyad
PM sent
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division E
DryNick (Arab Conquest) defeats kronenblatt (Rus with Bulgar (Danube) allies) 62 - 52
A very close game that could have easily gone the other way. Both sides were conservative and careful in approaching the enemy, with very few flanking attempts for the first half of the battle. Eventually the superior quality of the Arab spearmen allowed them to take hold of the center of the battlefield. In the meantime, the Rus archers did an excellent job at routing the entirety of the Arab cavalry and lights, which allowed for a successful flanking attempt on one side. Unfortunately for the Rus, the battle was over shortly after.
Good game, kronenblatt! Looking forward meeting you again on the battlefield.
(3-1)
DryNick (Arab Conquest) defeats kronenblatt (Rus with Bulgar (Danube) allies) 62 - 52
A very close game that could have easily gone the other way. Both sides were conservative and careful in approaching the enemy, with very few flanking attempts for the first half of the battle. Eventually the superior quality of the Arab spearmen allowed them to take hold of the center of the battlefield. In the meantime, the Rus archers did an excellent job at routing the entirety of the Arab cavalry and lights, which allowed for a successful flanking attempt on one side. Unfortunately for the Rus, the battle was over shortly after.
Good game, kronenblatt! Looking forward meeting you again on the battlefield.
(3-1)
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your result here . . .
Division E
Deeter (Carthage) defeats DryNick (Carthage) 62-49
To quote Pogo: We have met the enemy and they is us. Good game, DryNick.
Deeter
Deeter (Carthage) defeats DryNick (Carthage) 62-49
To quote Pogo: We have met the enemy and they is us. Good game, DryNick.
Deeter
-
kronenblatt
- General - Carrier

- Posts: 4695
- Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:17 pm
- Location: Stockholm, SWEDEN
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Blagrot wrote: ↑Thu Nov 19, 2020 10:24 pm Division E
Blagrot (British 600-1030 AD with Viking 780-899 AD allies) beat kronenblatt (Rus 960-1053 AD with Bulgar (Danube) 852-1018 AD allies) 60% - 45%
The British had early success with the huscarls (and sheer numbers) breaking the Russian centre, evasive lights and well maneouvered foot kept the Russians holding on for a time but eventually enough units were caught and killed to claim victory, thanks for the game and chat![]()
Many thanks to the both of you for two great and fun battles and your well deserved victories! In both cases my centre broke, which I have to give some thought afterwards, but I managed to hold on anyway, at least for some time. But had to give in at the end. Thanks also for pleasant and interesting chats about the battle and other real-life stuff; makes playing so much more fun and is actually as far as I'm concerned a very important (even crucial) part of playing and enjoying FoG2.DryNick wrote: ↑Fri Nov 20, 2020 6:45 pm Division E
DryNick (Arab Conquest) defeats kronenblatt (Rus with Bulgar (Danube) allies) 62 - 52
A very close game that could have easily gone the other way. Both sides were conservative and careful in approaching the enemy, with very few flanking attempts for the first half of the battle. Eventually the superior quality of the Arab spearmen allowed them to take hold of the center of the battlefield. In the meantime, the Rus archers did an excellent job at routing the entirety of the Arab cavalry and lights, which allowed for a successful flanking attempt on one side. Unfortunately for the Rus, the battle was over shortly after.
Good game, kronenblatt! Looking forward meeting you again on the battlefield.
kronenblatt's campaign and tournament thread hub:
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division E
Blagrot (British 600-1030 AD with Viking 780-899 AD allies) beat ggarynorman (Pictish 477-850 AD with Scots Irish 477-899 AD allies) 41% - 0%
A brutal game for the picts who charged in aggressively and mostly bounced, the penalty to medium morale in the open made a massive impact as the British shrugged off most lost combats and the Picts dropped or double-dropped, the British cavalry slipping around the flank delivered a coup-de-grace. Thanks for the game and the spirit you took it in and I hope to play you again soon.
Blagrot (British 600-1030 AD with Viking 780-899 AD allies) beat ggarynorman (Pictish 477-850 AD with Scots Irish 477-899 AD allies) 41% - 0%
A brutal game for the picts who charged in aggressively and mostly bounced, the penalty to medium morale in the open made a massive impact as the British shrugged off most lost combats and the Picts dropped or double-dropped, the British cavalry slipping around the flank delivered a coup-de-grace. Thanks for the game and the spirit you took it in and I hope to play you again soon.
Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Division E
Blagrot (British 600-1030 AD with Viking 780-899 AD allies) challenges Tratmot (Polish 966-1057 AD with Russian 966-1053 AD allies)
PW:Wings
Blagrot (British 600-1030 AD with Viking 780-899 AD allies) challenges Tratmot (Polish 966-1057 AD with Russian 966-1053 AD allies)
PW:Wings
-
paulmcneil
- 1st Lieutenant - Grenadier

- Posts: 778
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:07 pm
- Location: Hamble, UK
- Contact:
Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
paulmcneil (Babylonian) beat schmolywar (Assyrian) 55:30
paulmcneil (Babylonian) beat schmolywar (Assyrian) 55:30
Paul McNeil
Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Division E
Blagrot (Arab City 300-633 AD) challenges grumpydaddy845 (Dacian 89-106 AD)
PW:Falx
Also
Blagrot (Arab City 300-633 AD) challenges snooky51 (Parthian 250 BC-225 AD with Arab 312 BC-299 AD allies)
PW:Arabs
Finally
Blagrot (Arab City 300-633 AD) challenges Tratmot (Armenian 253-476 AD with Roman 285-312 AD allies)
PW:Arrows
Blagrot (Arab City 300-633 AD) challenges grumpydaddy845 (Dacian 89-106 AD)
PW:Falx
Also
Blagrot (Arab City 300-633 AD) challenges snooky51 (Parthian 250 BC-225 AD with Arab 312 BC-299 AD allies)
PW:Arabs
Finally
Blagrot (Arab City 300-633 AD) challenges Tratmot (Armenian 253-476 AD with Roman 285-312 AD allies)
PW:Arrows
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division C
Stew101 (Frankish, with Breton allies) beat Najanaja (Hindu Indian). Score: 45 - 15.
Thanks for a great game to finish the DL season.
Stew101 (Frankish, with Breton allies) beat Najanaja (Hindu Indian). Score: 45 - 15.
Thanks for a great game to finish the DL season.
-
Najanaja
- Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL

- Posts: 426
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:35 am
- Location: Australia
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
Najanaja (Dacian) beat paulmcneil (Slav) 44-7
Najanaja (Dacian) beat paulmcneil (Slav) 44-7
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your result here . . .
Division E
Deeter (Carthage) defeats rs2excelsior (Samnites) 57-32
We met the Samsonite hoards and sent them packing. Well played.
Deeter
Deeter (Carthage) defeats rs2excelsior (Samnites) 57-32
We met the Samsonite hoards and sent them packing. Well played.
Deeter


