Match ups in large battles vs medium battles

Field of Glory II is a turn-based tactical game set during the Rise of Rome from 280 BC to 25 BC.
Post Reply
Jagger2002
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 491
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2014 7:31 pm

Match ups in large battles vs medium battles

Post by Jagger2002 »

I have been wondering does a large sized battle favor the dominant army in a match up vs the same match up in a medium sized battle? I very rarely play large battles but my gut feeling is that the larger sized battle would favor the dominant army in a game between equal players. A weaker army needs to gain a battlefield edge and exploit that edge, usually quickly, to win. However I think it would be harder to gain and exploit an advantage with larger forces as the additional troops would make it easier for a dominant army to recover from mistakes than the weaker army. Something I was wondering about.

So any thoughts?
TheGrayMouser
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Posts: 5001
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:42 pm

Re: Match ups in large battles vs medium battles

Post by TheGrayMouser »

Jagger2002 wrote: Wed Apr 22, 2020 3:15 pm I have been wondering does a large sized battle favor the dominant army in a match up vs the same match up in a medium sized battle? I very rarely play large battles but my gut feeling is that the larger sized battle would favor the dominant army in a game between equal players. A weaker army needs to gain a battlefield edge and exploit that edge, usually quickly, to win. However I think it would be harder to gain and exploit an advantage with larger forces as the additional troops would make it easier for a dominant army to recover from mistakes than the weaker army. Something I was wondering about.

So any thoughts?
I would say if both players had the same level of experience in various size battles, then it won’t matter. I’m not sure but possibly what could matter is the size of the map as it doesn’t necessarily scale perfectly to the unit count...
Karvon
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2329
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:36 pm
Location: Osaka, Japan

Re: Match ups in large battles vs medium battles

Post by Karvon »

How much empty space there is really depends on the size of the field selected, the density of restricting terrain and presence, or not, of large rivers, and the unit density of the armies involved. On very large fields, with free deployment, you can easily mass in one sector or the other and achieve a quick local superiority if your opponent has spread himself out too thin trying to cover the whole field, or otherwise misdeployed.

The thing I don't like about very large battles is it takes a long time to move everything and you have to be extra careful not to overlook things with more to keep track of.
GamerMan
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 5:26 pm

Re: Match ups in large battles vs medium battles

Post by GamerMan »

I imagine large battles would help the dominant army, just because there is random variance, and the larger the battle, the more the variance balances out. It would also help the stronger player, since bad luck is less likely to cost them the game as well.
Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory II”