Arab Conquest Jund Qs
Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators
-
- Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
- Posts: 492
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:54 am
- Location: Searching for the meaning of "Authors Intent"
Arab Conquest Jund Qs
Hello,
All other options for Jund Cavalry in Decline and Fall besides the one for Arab Conquest give the options to dismount them as Armored _quality per mounted version_
But in AC, they are ALL dismounted as Armored Superior, even those bought as Avg mounted.
This, obviously will be the option most take since it allows you to purchase HF, Armor, Sup, OS at 9 points/base from a list that normally doesn't give you that flexibility...
Was this an oversight?
If not, is there a reason for this historically?
Madcam.
All other options for Jund Cavalry in Decline and Fall besides the one for Arab Conquest give the options to dismount them as Armored _quality per mounted version_
But in AC, they are ALL dismounted as Armored Superior, even those bought as Avg mounted.
This, obviously will be the option most take since it allows you to purchase HF, Armor, Sup, OS at 9 points/base from a list that normally doesn't give you that flexibility...
Was this an oversight?
If not, is there a reason for this historically?
Madcam.
There goes another crossing the Rubicon!
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 10287
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: LarryWorld
-
- Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
- Posts: 492
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:54 am
- Location: Searching for the meaning of "Authors Intent"
Mea culpa....
I went with what I was told and quickly read... For some reason even skimming this quickly I thought I read armored...
but there it is clear as day... HF, Sup, undrill,prot, OS
As for my Turks...I only played them 4 games at the team tournament not 5 - don't recall losing with them.
Madcam.
I went with what I was told and quickly read... For some reason even skimming this quickly I thought I read armored...
but there it is clear as day... HF, Sup, undrill,prot, OS
As for my Turks...I only played them 4 games at the team tournament not 5 - don't recall losing with them.

Madcam.
There goes another crossing the Rubicon!
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
-
- Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:53 am
that's the thing. they're essentially a foot force who've acquired a cr@pload of horses, but still aren't so crash-hot on driving them.MikeK wrote:They obviously are more comfortable fighting on foot than mounted (see also Anglo Danes who don't sit a horse well) and therefore Average, although you could field them as more proficient (Superior) mounted.
the dismount as superior is just a gimme i'm sure as hell not complaining about. i take all 20 Jund in my AC.
-
- Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
- Posts: 492
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:54 am
- Location: Searching for the meaning of "Authors Intent"
14-6 to me.... Depends on how you declare a win... 2x enemy VPs works for meKatsu wrote:My bad Scott, I meant 3/0/1.
Did you and Ricky draw or do I owe you a custom painted battle group?
See you in Birmingham.
JM


But no, you don't owe me a BG. I couldn't squeak out the army.... Some gimp wasted a bunch of time arguing a minor point

Madcam.
There goes another crossing the Rubicon!
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0