Fog Errata v1.15

Post by **petirouge** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:36 pm

The new FoG errata (ver. 1.15) is now on the website

http://www.fieldofglory.com/onthefieldofglory.php

petedalby · Post by **petedalby** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:25 pm

The only change I can spot is to no 8. Clarification that stakes can not be picked up in an enemy's restricted area.

But if you've spotted something else.....

Pete

pbrandon · Post by **pbrandon** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:44 pm

Pete - the Wolves from the Sea addition at the end (in yellow)?

Paul

philqw78 · Post by **philqw78** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:47 pm

From which they missed the drilled Russ Archers. Not that it makes any difference, except to purists/pedants.

rbodleyscott · Post by **rbodleyscott** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:48 pm

petedalby wrote:The only change I can spot is to no 8. Clarification that stakes can not be picked up in an enemy's restricted area.

But if you've spotted something else.....

Pete

Pete, it's a new version of the Errata sheet, not the FAQ.

petedalby · Post by **petedalby** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:08 pm

Time to go back to the opticians methinks!!

Pete

petedalby · Post by **petedalby** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:11 pm

Pete - the Wolves from the Sea addition at the end (in yellow)?

Paul

You haven't got time to be looking at this. You need to be getting those runners and riders for Ascot published!!

Pete

SirGarnet · Post by **SirGarnet** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:35 pm

Thanks for helpfully highlighting the most recent additions in yellow!

Mike

pbrandon · Post by **pbrandon** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:36 pm

Well if a certain rules author had got his list in earlier...

They are with the web maestro and should be up shortly on the BHGS site.

As a teaser:

Shooty cav armies dominate but there are a few bowmeisters there too. 31 different armies in 15mm (assuming different varieties of WotR are the same). Dom Rom, WotR and Later Ottoman are the high frequency picks. No army duplication at 25mm.

Paul

petedalby · Post by **petedalby** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:53 pm

Well if a certain rules author had got his list in earlier...

Go on - name names!!

Look forward to seeing the details in due course - always a worry if I've gone for a popular choice - it never bodes well!

Pete

nikgaukroger · Post by **nikgaukroger** » Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:57 am

petedalby wrote:
Well if a certain rules author had got his list in earlier...
Go on - name names!!

Terry at a guess.