V1.5.25 ZOC changes
-
Cunningcairn
- Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind

- Posts: 1723
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Re: V1.5.25 ZOC changes
FFS am I living in a parallel universe? What are you all talking about? Is this a bug or is it how it is going to work?
-
stockwellpete
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 14501
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: V1.5.25 ZOC changes
Bah! Skirmishers? Just ignore the irritating blighters! 
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28411
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
Re: V1.5.25 ZOC changes
It is not a bug, it is how it always has worked, and how it is intended to work.Cunningcairn wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 9:25 am FFS am I living in a parallel universe? What are you all talking about? Is this a bug or is it how it is going to work?
They are not teleporting though the square that isn't highlighted, they are moving through it, but are not allowed to stop in it because it is outside their permitted arc of retreat from the ZOCing enemy. It is 45 degrees from the enemy facing, whereas to be permitted it has to be less than 45 degrees from the enemy facing - see manual section 12.1.1.
The final square, however, is less than 45 degrees from the enemy facing, making the overall move to that square permissable.
If the unit could stop in the intermediate square, then because it is no longer in the ZOC, it could then keep going in that direction for the rest of its move, which would effectively negate the ZOC restriction, as it would be well outside the permitted 44 degree arc.
If a square is not highlighted, it does not necessarily mean that the unit cannot move through it, just that it cannot end its move in it. The 44 degree arc of retreat from a ZOCing unit is for reasons of psychology, not physical constraints.
Also bear in mind that moving square by square is an artificial construct, which we only have because with full analogue movement it is too complex to code interactions. Also that as skirmishers, light infantry are not constrained to remain in formation, so they may just be filtering round the edge of the friendly unit rather than making the (1 degree) detour out of the "less than 45 degree" arc that the square by square path suggests.
Richard Bodley Scott


-
Cunningcairn
- Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind

- Posts: 1723
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Re: V1.5.25 ZOC changes
Thanks for the explanation.rbodleyscott wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 12:25 pmIt is not a bug, it is how it always has worked, and how it is intended to work.Cunningcairn wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 9:25 am FFS am I living in a parallel universe? What are you all talking about? Is this a bug or is it how it is going to work?
They are not teleporting though the square that isn't highlighted, they are moving through it, but are not allowed to stop in it because it is outside their permitted arc of retreat from the ZOCing enemy. It is 45 degrees from the enemy facing, whereas to be permitted it has to be less than 45 degrees from the enemy facing - see manual section 12.1.1.
The final square, however, is less than 45 degrees from the enemy facing, making the overall move to that square permissable.
If the unit could stop in the intermediate square, then because it is no longer in the ZOC, it could then keep going in that direction for the rest of its move, which would effectively negate the ZOC restriction, as it would be well outside the permitted 44 degree arc.
If a square is not highlighted, it does not necessarily mean that the unit cannot move through it, just that it cannot end its move in it. The 44 degree arc of retreat from a ZOCing unit is for reasons of psychology, not physical constraints.
Also bear in mind that moving square by square is an artificial construct, which we only have because with full analogue movement it is too complex to code interactions. Also that as skirmishers, light infantry are not constrained to remain in formation, so they may just be filtering round the edge of the friendly unit rather than making the (1 degree) detour out of the "less than 45 degree" arc that the square by square path suggests.
Re: V1.5.25 ZOC changes
@ Cunningcairn : I’m happy you got an answer that satisfies you. 
Sorry that my posts weren’t useful to you.
Sorry that my posts weren’t useful to you.
-
Cunningcairn
- Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind

- Posts: 1723
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Re: V1.5.25 ZOC changes
Thanks your posts were useful. Unfortunately the discussion then went completely off the question I'd posted without answering it. Having been told off myself in the past for not sticking to the topic I thought I'd bring it back on track. I believe it worked
-
pompeytheflatulent
- Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL

- Posts: 432
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2019 3:37 pm
Re: V1.5.25 ZOC changes
Still doesn't explain why the slingers can't move back through the Thracian spearmen behind them.
Re: V1.5.25 ZOC changes
Ok. then I'm happy I could helpCunningcairn wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 7:09 pm Thanks your posts were useful. Unfortunately the discussion then went completely off the question I'd posted without answering it. Having been told off myself in the past for not sticking to the topic I thought I'd bring it back on track. I believe it worked![]()
They can, whatever their friendly unit behind them is, Thracian spearmen or the unit I used in my first post.pompeytheflatulent wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 7:19 pm Still doesn't explain why the slingers can't move back through the Thracian spearmen behind them.
But look at the 5 squares the LF can move to, on the first picture below : two squares are illuminated, the others are not. And the square I guess you are talking about is not. Likewise on OP pictures. I think that's what you are talking about, aren't you ?
before moving :

after moving :

In the OP situation, the slingers could move back to the red cross :

Last edited by Athos1660 on Thu Feb 27, 2020 10:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: V1.5.25 ZOC changes
Really? In the OP's original screenshot there is no indication that the move is possible, unless my eyes are getting bad!
Field of Glory II Scenario Designer - Age of Belisarius, Rise of Persia, Wolves at the Gate and Swifter than Eagles.
Field of Glory II Medieval Scenario Designer.
FOGII TT Mod Creator
Warhammer 40,000: Sanctus Reach Tournament Scenario Designer.
Field of Glory II Medieval Scenario Designer.
FOGII TT Mod Creator
Warhammer 40,000: Sanctus Reach Tournament Scenario Designer.
Re: V1.5.25 ZOC changes
On OP pictures, I can't see neither the brown dots showing ZoC1 nor the on-screen visual aids showing where the slingers can move to, thanks to the 'Pass through' mechanism, such as those visible on my pics :

And I read once :
So I guess there is an option (that I can't find) that disables them. Maybe is it only in MP ? Or is it a game rule for MP ?
If so, the only screen aids that remain are the illuminated square(s). But it doesn't mean the slingers couldn't move to the red cross on the pic above.

I guess 'illuminated' squares are squares a unit can move to without using the 'Pass though mechanism' (in red) ; in this instance, by taking the blue paths :

Re: V1.5.25 ZOC changes
I have been playing this game for nearly three years, I was in the initial Beta test, and I don't know of any way to turn off the tile indicators.Athos1660 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2020 10:24 amOn OP pictures, I can't see neither the brown dots showing ZoC1 nor the on-screen visual aids showing where the slingers can move to, thanks to the 'Pass through' mechanism, such as those visible on my pics :
And I read once :
So I guess there is an option (that I can't find) that disables them. Maybe is it only in MP ? Or is it a game rule for MP ?
If so, the only screen aids that remain are the illuminated square(s). But it doesn't mean the slingers couldn't move to the red cross on the pic above.
Anyway, nevermind that, I ran my own test and have got to the bottom of this.
In the first screenshot we see our brave slingers (who some would like to see trapped and destroyed!) with all their routes indicated, including pass throughs, and the brown ZOC1 dots for the Arab Camels:

I then move them to a tile:

I then "Undo" the movement, and they return to their original position:

Notice how the passthrough tiles have all now disappeared, and the brown dots too! Obviously this is a consequence of using the Undo button! You can get them to appear again just by clicking on the unit.
It's a shame this was not made clear at the time.
Field of Glory II Scenario Designer - Age of Belisarius, Rise of Persia, Wolves at the Gate and Swifter than Eagles.
Field of Glory II Medieval Scenario Designer.
FOGII TT Mod Creator
Warhammer 40,000: Sanctus Reach Tournament Scenario Designer.
Field of Glory II Medieval Scenario Designer.
FOGII TT Mod Creator
Warhammer 40,000: Sanctus Reach Tournament Scenario Designer.
Re: V1.5.25 ZOC changes
That's it! Congrats for having found it out.
no big deal, right ?
- When playing :
- the screen aids appear at the beginning
- after "undo', the "pass-through mechanism" remains useable and visible when hovering the mouse pointer over a "pass-trough square", as shown on the pic below
- It just makes it unclear when posting on the forum (like in OP).

Last edited by Athos1660 on Fri Feb 28, 2020 8:32 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
Cunningcairn
- Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind

- Posts: 1723
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Re: V1.5.25 ZOC changes
I then "Undo" the movement, and they return to their original position:

Notice how the passthrough tiles have all now disappeared, and the brown dots too! Obviously this is a consequence of using the Undo button! You can get them to appear again just by clicking on the unit.
It's a shame this was not made clear at the time.
[/quote]
Wow well done sorting that out.

Notice how the passthrough tiles have all now disappeared, and the brown dots too! Obviously this is a consequence of using the Undo button! You can get them to appear again just by clicking on the unit.
It's a shame this was not made clear at the time.
[/quote]
Wow well done sorting that out.

