When does close combat commence

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

hammy
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 5440
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Stockport
Contact:

When does close combat commence

Post by hammy »

From a game today.

One of my LH BGs breaks, the pursuers clip another of my LH BGs so there will be an impact combat in the next (my) impact phase. A handy BG of cavalry lancers is in a possition to charge the other side of the pursuing LH BG. I am assuming that as soon at the pursuers contact my LH that they are in 'close combat' even though no dice have been rolled so they can't evade.
marshalney2000
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1175
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 10:14 am

Post by marshalney2000 »

I would agree with you on this one.
John
hazelbark
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4957
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Capital of the World !!

Post by hazelbark »

I also concur.


The interesting wrinkle is a BG only as an overlap to a enemy BG. The enemy BG breaks in the initial impact phase.

Does the overlapping BG pursue? It would be in close combat if you get to the melee phase. But does it count the overlap for defining close combat for the initial impact phase?
SirGarnet
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Posts: 2186
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:13 am

Re: When does close combat commence

Post by SirGarnet »

hammy wrote:I am assuming that as soon at the pursuers contact my LH that they are in 'close combat' even though no dice have been rolled so they can't evade.
Just to clarify, I assume "they" refers to the pursuers being unable to evade from the upcoming charge by the Cavalry Lancers because the clipped LH passed its test to receive the pursuers charge and the pursuers are now "joined" in close combat per p108 and 134? Agreed.
hammy
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 5440
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Stockport
Contact:

Re: When does close combat commence

Post by hammy »

MikeK wrote:
hammy wrote:I am assuming that as soon at the pursuers contact my LH that they are in 'close combat' even though no dice have been rolled so they can't evade.
Just to clarify, I assume "they" refers to the pursuers being unable to evade from the upcoming charge by the Cavalry Lancers because the clipped LH passed its test to receive the pursuers charge and the pursuers are now "joined" in close combat per p108 and 134? Agreed.
Yes,

The pursuers were disrupted light horse who my nice steady light horse were happy to take the charge of on the chin. My lancers had just finished off one of Dave's lancer BGs and were having a chat with one of my other cavalry BGs, they were then burst through by a routing LH BG and my lancers failed a shock troop test and burst through the other cavalry to get at the pursuing light horse. It was a rather confused fight all in all.
SirGarnet
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Posts: 2186
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:13 am

Post by SirGarnet »

Sounds like the rules handled that confused brawl flawlessly. :)
hammy
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 5440
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Stockport
Contact:

Post by hammy »

MikeK wrote:Sounds like the rules handled that confused brawl flawlessly. :)
I think so but Dave's LH weren't so sure :shock:
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3862
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Post by dave_r »

I'm still not sure....

The light horse have not charged and have taken no part in any impact or ongoing melee - how are they adjudged to be "in close combat"?
SirGarnet
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Posts: 2186
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:13 am

Post by SirGarnet »

dave_r wrote:I'm still not sure....

The light horse have not charged and have taken no part in any impact or ongoing melee - how are they adjudged to be "in close combat"?
According to p108 the pursuing LH are considered charging. Since the target does not evade they are contacted and combat is "joined" even though not resolved until Impact Phase.
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3862
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Post by dave_r »

Where does it say "Combat is joined"? Doesn't say that on pg 108?
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

P 134 uses the term.
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
hammy
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 5440
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Stockport
Contact:

Post by hammy »

nikgaukroger wrote:P 134 uses the term.
I pointed Dave at that page but he insisted that as no dice had been rolled that combat had not been 'joined' :?
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3862
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Post by dave_r »

Well that is cos it doesn't say that isn't it? :roll:

What pg 134 states is "Close Combat is a general term for impact and melee combat."

My whole argument lies in the fact that there hadn't been any impact or melee combat at the point at which the Light Horse were charged.
madcam2us
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:54 am
Location: Searching for the meaning of "Authors Intent"

Post by madcam2us »

Dave,

At the IWF I will met a kindred spirit.... Perhaps you've got some Irish in you? Mom's Gma/Gpa came from the Emerald Isle not too long ago....

Separated at birth?

fight the power!

Madcam.
There goes another crossing the Rubicon!
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3862
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Post by dave_r »

Perhaps you've got some Irish in you
Don't swear at me. I'm no bog trotter. I originate from the cultural revolution known as Newcastle, or the North East.

It's all these ruddy Southerners from Burnley and Manchester that don't understand what's written ;)

Are you the same MadCam2us from the Flames of War forums?
madcam2us
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:54 am
Location: Searching for the meaning of "Authors Intent"

Post by madcam2us »

One in the same...

Still coming over?

Madcam
There goes another crossing the Rubicon!
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
madcam2us
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:54 am
Location: Searching for the meaning of "Authors Intent"

Post by madcam2us »

My next door neighbors are ex-pat Newcastlians....

Know any Lightburns?

Madcam.
There goes another crossing the Rubicon!
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
hammy
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 5440
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Stockport
Contact:

Post by hammy »

Just a thought Dave,

If close combat is not joined at the moment of contact then if a pursuer hits the flank of an unengaged BG (not as a flank charge) then the unengaged BG would by your theory not in combat and thus able to charge off somewhere else......
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3862
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Post by dave_r »

Still coming over?
Definitely. Booked the flights and accomodation and everything. Just need to register for the tournament now.....

Newcastle is a fairly large place. I must be honest and state I probably don't know the people in question... Anyway I live down South now in Manchester
DaiSho
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
Posts: 792
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 10:02 am
Location: Australia

Post by DaiSho »

dave_r wrote:Well that is cos it doesn't say that isn't it? :roll:

What pg 134 states is "Close Combat is a general term for impact and melee combat."

My whole argument lies in the fact that there hadn't been any impact or melee combat at the point at which the Light Horse were charged.
However, if you charge someone and then find out they can be intercept charged, you can't take back the charge. This is in essence what has happened.

Ian
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”